Bradley S. Clarke's April 18th, 2022; A Prison Within A Prison Post on Medium.Com Is A Trite Apology For the Extra-Judicial Act Of Solitary-Confinement and It's Long Term Effects On the Human Being By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

My Name is William Thorpe. I'm a Virginia prisoner exiled to the Texas prison system and I am in solitary confinement. Starting in Virginia on August 9th, 1996 after a hostage-taking at Nottoway Correctional Center and I'm still in solitary-confinement at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas prison system.

I respond to Bradley S. Clarke within the context of Virginia's use of the extra-judicial act of solitary-confinement, because he specified Virginia in his April 17th work and more importantly I speak authoritatively on Virginias solitary-confinement practices because I have experienced all of its conditions and circumstances.

I begin with a correction: Mr. Clark tells us that "the special management unit of the Eyman State Prison Complex in Florence, Arizona was the first Supermax facility constructed in the United States [in 1986]"' This is wrong, Virginia's Mecklenburg Correctional Center, which opened in March 1977, was the nations first, under the logic of "to provide maximum security segregation and treatment for the most difficult inmates." 

I'm not about to put together a 50+ paragraph response to Mr. Clarke's work which I consider ignores the crux of the issue of solitary-confinement, which is its extra-judicial nature, it's lawlessness.

What Is Solitary-Confinement

Solitary-confinement is a default, lawless fact of the idealistic and speculative expression of the ad hoc nature of the justice system, which in more ways than one exist extra-judicially.

The imprisoned and non-imprisoned Virginian exist solely as creations of the rule of law and its speculative continuum. But the existence is a past tense of law. What I mean by this is: Imprisonment is an after the fact of a conviction. The conviction, its travesties,vagaries, is an after the fact of the alleged criminal code violation, which consist a process according to the social contract or the rule of law is due. If all aspects of Virginia society exist under the omnipotent umbrella of rule of law, then any imposition and assertion by the state, the collective will of the people as organized violence, which prison and its extra-judicial practice of solitary-confinement is a crucible has to occur within a process, the rule of law. But what we encounter is its violation on all accounts as a petty cudgel of control, a transformation into crass suppositions whose farcial legitimacy is its relationship and proximity to money and its redistributive value within the locale of the prison.

So we see that the practice of solitary-confinement is a cash cow, a money tree, a feed lot for the political-economy of the prison system. To wit, which we are presented with the perverse logic of the Virginia Department of Corrections claiming it will cost $23 million to reform its solitary-confinement practice addiction. Consequently, prison officials are unwilling to relinquish their clutch and grubbing grasp of the free flow of the taxpayer money into their solitary-confinement regime.

I challenge Mr. Clarke to do a rework. beginning with explaining to us, the ignorant people why the Virginia Department of Corrections reformulated the solitary-confinement practice at its supermax prisons, Red Onion and Wallens Ridge State Prisons in 2011 after both prisons which opened in 1998 and 1999 respectively had been operating a solitary-confinement regime of the same prisoners it reclassified under a distortive and opaque verbiage - yet solitary confined. He cited Red Onions step down program without critical analysis of its legitimacy, save as I've stated a mechanism for cash flow, a feed for the prison systems political-economy.

Bradley S. Clarke Is An Apologist for the Extra-Judicial Act of Solitary-Confinement

In his apologetic zeal Mr. Clarke introduces us to a couple of anonymous prison guards who are so completely and thoughroly immersed in the impunity of extra-judicial behavior that the irony of their existence as prison guards because of the rule of law escapes them as evidenced by the cavalier nature of their ascribed quotes, starting with: 

"People don't get a view of it. They don't understand why we lean towards [using solitary confinement] instead of against it"

Mr. Clarke continues:

Neither Jimmy nor Matt credits the argument that solitary confinement constitutes torture." The guys aren't going down in a hole they're not being tortured", Matt said "they're still getting every meal that they're supposed to get, they're still getting it delivered to their cell. It's not like they're being withheld anything that they're supposed to have." Jimmy argues that the entertainment industry makes solitary confinement out to be worse than it is      exasperated Jimmy said "I would love for somebody to sit back and provide the correctional community with another option that is anywhere near as effective."

The indefatigable Kimberly Jenkins-Snodgrass

Mr. Clarke closed his work with commentary from Kim J. one of a number of the Virginia minds and hearts working tirelessly to hold the Virginia Department of Corrections Accountable to its mission statement. I close with it isn't apparent from Mr. Clarkes work the basis of his interest, but if as a citizen his scrutiny into prison as a system and expression of the organized violence of the state is to render it transparent thus accountable, then I, along with the listed groups welcome his involvement, support, and alliance.

ACLU of Virginia

ACLU People Power Fairfax

Bridging The Gap In Virginia

Charlottesville Chapter National Organization for Women

Coalition for Justice

The Humanization Project

Inmate Support Virginia 

Interfaith Action for Human Rights (IAHR)

Just Future Project

NAACP Loudoun 

National Association of Social Workers, Virginia Chapter

Resource Information Help for the Disadvantaged and Disenfranchised (RIHD)

SALT-Social Action Linking Together

Social Workers and Allies Against Solitary Confinement

Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of Virginia

Virginia Defenders for Freedom, Justice & Equality

Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy

Virginia Justice Democrats 

Virginia Justice for Life

Virginia Prisoner Of Conscience

Virginia Prison Justice Network

Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee 

WJCC Coalition for Community Justice

*NOTE To be added to the growing list email us at vapacommittee@gmail.com

By William Thorpe

Teaching About Racism

 

(AFP/Getty Images/Andrew Caballero-Reynolds)

Should concepts of critical race theory be part of classroom instruction?

By Ruth Terry

Introduction

In 2020, critical race theory (CRT) became a political wedge issue, as conservative legislators, educators and parents sought to ban CRT from K-12 schools, even as many K-12 educators denied that it was being taught. Critics also took aim at diversity training programs in workplaces and universities. A legal framework pioneered in the 1970s, critical race theory maintains that racism is commonplace and systemic within legal and social structures, and it centers the history and lived experiences of marginalized people. Measures to ban CRT or its underlying concepts from classrooms have been proposed in nearly 30 states and enacted in at least eight. In the corporate sector, some employees are pushing back on diversity training that asks workers to reflect on racial bias and privilege, with some filing lawsuits. Despite widespread debate, there is little consensus among either opponents or proponents about what constitutes critical race theory within curricula and workplace trainings. Still, the controversy continues to rage in legislative assemblies, school board meetings and on social media.

About the Author

Ruth Terry is a Black and Puerto Rican American freelancer based in Istanbul. She earned a master's of public administration and worked in nonprofit fundraising before transitioning to journalism in 2010 — a career shift that began with a nonprofit best practices column for a regional business magazine. Since then, Ruth has written about food, culture, race and travel for national and international outlets, including Al Jazeera, National Geographic, Nature, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Time.

Source

CQ Press ~ CQ Researcher ~  In-depth reports on today’s issues.

*NOTE* We at vapac send respect and appreciation for the opportunity to share Ruth Terry's work. To join their conversation and get to know more about their work visit 

• Twitter  @Ruth_Terry
• Twitter @cqresearcher

Is Texas and its Department of Criminal Justice For Real?

 

Placing the onus and responsibilty on prisoners to boil water to a rolling boil only exposes how malfeasant Texas prison officials are, because how do they possibly expect prisoners to boil water to a roll?

By vapac

National Public Radio [NPR] Michel Martin Opportunistic and Selective Definition of Harm and the American Prisoner

On 1/22/22; National Public Radio, NPR Michel Martin once again gave us another installment of her performance journalism.

At the conclusion of an interview with a representative of the prison information advocacy group Prison Policy on the gross negligence, malfeasant, the covid-19 pandemic, and its murderous toll on the American prisoner by the prison official. Michel Martin demanded that the prison reform advocate defend why NPR's audience should care that prisoners are being killed by prison officials gross negligence and malfeasance, under the specious and spurious strawman logic that prisoners are in prison because of harm they have caused and done.

Harm and the American  prisoner 

 Let us once and for all put to rest and to quote the Emperor Haile Selassie I the first by way of Bob Marley in the defiance of "War"       is discredited and utterly abandoned      No one is in prison because of a supposed or actual harm done. Because if as Michel Martin asserts, harm done, then she would've long since found herself in prison considering the organic harm her misinformation and misleading work as a functionary of corporate media has done to Americans and American public.

The American prisoner is imprisoned because of one thing and one thing only. Law and it's court process either by conviction or a supposed guilty plead deal. 

 Asserting as Michel Martin did on 1/22/22 that the expression of care and concern for fellow human should be conditioned on the speculation and idealisitc practices of prison and imprisonment as based on a social interaction that can and is easily changed and reformed is rediculous and only reveals why laws are broken.

Instead of Michel Martin seizing the opportunity, the covid-19 pandemic has presented to expose the prison officials failings and the inherent antagonisms of imprisonment as social speech in 2022 she succumbed to cowardice and fear of crossing a supposition held by the stus quo. As if the existence and social fact of the American prisoner isn't a revelation that regardless of how a type of political exploitation specifically Republicans and their "white" evangelical hucksters scream about law, order and justice      our human condition is firmly planted, rooted in the injustices of the futile pursuit of supremacy      to which we have the Michel Martins of corporate media to thank and indict.

I'm William Thorpe in solitary confinement at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas prison system exiled from the Virginia prison system.