VIRGINIA'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ACT, IS THE OVERLOOKED NEMESIS OF HOLDING THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABLE AND PRISON REFORM By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Holding human actions and behavior to account and the accountability-function is always ever present in human society and the Social Contract, however the distinction of its realization, is whether its process is relatively accepted or it is fraught with impediments and a everyday destabilizing struggle. In otherwords are the daily relations and Social Contract interactions a continuum of braining each other, in pursuit of what is fair and just, an understanding that we exist not in fear of the other, but on the fact that there is process of redress or the recognition, that if human life, is to be unconditionally valued, then, just as it is accepted that, the human capacity for "love" and its expression is taken on its face, without qualifications, then the acceptance of the innateness or inalienability of ones or the human idea of fairness, harm and injustice isn't dependent on some one else's, notions regardless of ability to right the wrong, the fact that a wrong has been done isn't debatable. But as soon as the dehumanization of the human being, becomes a fact, as we see and observe in the circumstance and condition of imprisonment experienced by the Virginia prisoner, we then see it structured and constructed as a denial of the prisoner's inalienable and innate idea of ownership of what is fair, harm and what is unjust by the type and sort of impediments and obstacles placed in the path of seeking redress or realizing the accountability-function. At this juncture I have to flesh this out, We, meaning the human condition, have been told that as a socio-person we exist in "freedom" as a relative and approximate condition as explanation of our experienced behavior of the Social Contract, its terms and relations, but as all things political-economy, which is the primary and foremost function of the Social Contract, it is euphemism and deceptive, because, what the Social Contract actually does is, it dehumanizes. The terms the Virginia person has with the personhood of itself as the Commonwealth of Virginia, is dialectically sovereign and subject at the same time, which because of such diametrically opposing relationship terms, from sovereign to subject, it then has a dehumanizing character and nature, because that historical developmental process of the Social Contract, hasn't truly permitted and allowed a confronting with itself, in order to resolve that antagonistic existence of dehumanization, which we see clearly revealed in the circumstance and condition of the Virginia prisoner. Because when the human being is denied of that inalienable capacity of that innate idea of fairness and injustice, because of the imposition of obstacles and impediments, in the path of redress as the Virginia prisoner is particularly subjected to, then the consequence and result is dehumanization. Notwithstanding the Constitutions of Virginia and of The United States assertions, of the people's right to petition government and seek redress, it is conditional. So for example Virginia's Administrative Process Act, specifically prohibits, it excludes prisoners from it and the Administrative Process is a fundamental function of Virginia's Government and even as the Virginia prisoner is comprehensively a subject of government, what then is being said by the prohibition on the prisoner's ability to access it, regardless of logic and reason?. The consequence of this prohibition is de jure impunity of the professional behavior of the prison official in all aspects of treatment of the Virginia prisoner and without confronting the impunity causing effects of the Administrative Process Act, the work of reform is a wink and nod

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

OUR VIRGINIA ORGANIZED LABOR GROUPS AND "UNIFORMS OF BRUTALITY" III By William Thorpe

I started this focus on Labor Groups, which this is a third installment, by quoting Bob Marley's incisive lyric, "Uniforms of Brutality" and its capture, (which I'm unsure whether, Bob himself recognized it as that intrinsic dialectic of "work" as the purest definition of the "liberty" or freedom euphemism, which his "uniforms of brutality" lyric illustrated) as that embodiment of it's aversive role and purpose of cowering or keeping Labor insubordination to the status quo assertions of Virginia's Social Contract with prison and the imprisonment circumstance. As we labor towards the unconditional reform of Virginia's imprisonment circumstance on the accountability-function of government and it's final return to the People of Virginia as the subordination of the Virginia prison official to their will, meaning exacting accountability, a lot of insight and actual understandings of everything about Virginia's social contract, that has been cloaked by that suppositionary and colloquial ignorance of, "taken for granted "by the people, will inevitably come into focus despite the fact that those who benefited from its "business as usual", knew perfectly well that its existing terms and culture, meaning everything was due to their machinations and their faith in the ignorance of " We The People".If the only function and purpose of the Human Being and the Human Condition respectively is "Work", then a value, with two characters will naturally come into existence, which is, the "value" of management or maintenance and direction, as it is expressed in the two characters of control and its subjects or objective, or who is in control and who is being controlled and when this is appropriated at the expense of the human conditional climb towards that mastery of it's all around realization or progress, it then transforms into that antagonism of exploitation or that condition of instead of pursing the "perfection of the unity of the people", war is instead waged on them, under the supposition that, the fundamental purpose of "work" as means of creating, supporting and defending the conditions and circumstances of Human Life, must exist as war between them. In other words the progressive dynamic of competition or that process of refining quality, is perverted into, that cutting of the nose to spite the face, War. This perversion is permitted because of and by the simple fact of "existence by acceptance", because Labor as it stands in its organized state, which in itself isn't commentary on the organizing motive and factor, but a critique of maturity, based on it's self-realization and the unequivocal understanding, that the organized fact in itself isn't a simple imposition but a natural fact of purpose or that synthesis of competition for itself transforming into the collaboration of self-interest. Or if The Human or as it concerns this work the People of Virginia, exist to work who then benefits? So, what we see is when this question isn't correctly answered, regardless of reason, the people are firstly warred on and here is the crux, by themselves. Yes there is that superficial recognition that it is foisted, a necessary mechanism of inserting that status quo self-serving narrative of "work" along with its inoculation against any counter exposé for the reason it's existence on the people is a mechanism of division. What this truly means then is the acceptance of impunity and that toxic lack of accountability, which we see as Labor its, rank and file arrayed in those "uniforms of brutality", diametrically in opposition with itself.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

OUR LABOR GROUPS ARE RELATIVELY ABSENT FROM THE WORK OF PRISON REFORM IN VIRGINIA II By William Thorpe

There is a reason why human behavior that unambiguously and unequivocally harms, besides the assigned distinction and categorization by Law, is, notwithstanding political exploitation by either being underscored or diminished and minimized, not comprehensively recognized as such, in itself. Which firstly tells us that whatever stance taken by and asserted by the justice application has nothing to do with the repair of Harm and it's commensurate effect and impact but instead, secondly has a more biased purpose, which then reveals and shows that the purpose or utility is in opposition. Now what I'll show with relative analysis in this work, is what I mean by, that biased purpose or utility is in opposition, with that opposition materializing into and manifesting as Labor and its organized groups, to be specific Labor is the target and why it is relatively absent from the work of prison reform and the specificity of this work, Virginia. I BEGIN: I've been breathing on and giving air to the analysis that prison and the imprisonment circumstance is all about being that proverbial stick to compel, "work", into an organized, in itself, entity, Labor, existing in a organized manner for another logic of interest, that even if it's own particularized interest intersects, with that "other" it is nominal and in order for that "other" to maintain that nominalism as its optimal maintenance condition, which is consequently punitive, the only method and technique our primitive Social Contract as dominated by that "other" or a specific interest bias has realized and developed is, "aversion", which is what prison and the imprisonment circumstance is. In otherwords our primitive Social Contract and its logic recognizes, that, that in itself freedom of action is only a for itself euphemism of liberty as work and its existence to produce for and on its status quo terms. In otherwords social contract recognized and legitimate person hood, is simply that of having the permission as freedom and its euphemistic liberty of working within it and for it. I won't waste the readers time defending this basic understanding, save to state that, the imprisonment circumstance as it is currently formulated didn't emerge and appear, till the abolishment of chattel slavery and its replacement with de jure Nationalization of slavery as criminal sanction under the 13th amendment to the Constitution of The United States. In otherwords as soon as work and its organized labor wasn't de jure compulsory, the imprisonment circumstance and its evolution as we experience it along with its opportunistic rationalization appeared as that metaphoric "coat of many colors". Our ancients have instructed, and I clarify it with, the Human Condition and its narrative is simply and primarily that of "work", which for analytic purpose, within the context of the Social Contract and its political-economy dynamic is Labor and its Organized motive. Just as the circle refuses to be squared, so is objective truth akin to Silver outside of its function definitive in existence for itself. Which was the relative relationship the human condition had with and understood work as, prior to the imposition of the exploitive and appropriating construct of its organized value, which prison and the imprisonment circumstance stands as that overseer with whip. Nothing I'm saying is to imply or infer, my position is permissive of asocial and harmful behaviour at the expensive of accountability. My position is, prison and the imprisonment scheme is a fact of Virginia's Social Contract, under law, its reform then is primarily that practicality of holding the Virginia prison official accountable and if the entire imprisonment scheme exists to cower labor, then Labor must speak.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

TWO ASPECTS OF VIRGINIA PRISON REFORM By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

First of all, this is the orienting vantage of how we stand in relationship to Virginia Prison Reform: IT ISN'T A BOON OR DISPENSATION. I BEGIN: The Virginia Prison and its imprisonment condition stands as the most speculative and suppositionary practice ever assumed by its Social Contract, consequently it contains all of the Commonwealth's shortcomings, hypocrisies and antagonisms because its work is that of dehumanization, plain and simple which ensuingly corrupts according to relative proximity or it accentuates its inherence. The work of our analysis and its animation of reforming the Virginia prison circumstance as it holds the Virginia prison official accountable along with Virginia's Government accountability-function, is to refute and repudiate its ossified and idealistic narrative regardless of logic. This first aspect of refuting and repudiating its ossified and idealistic narrative regardless of logic, assumes a number of forms, with the primary as that of getting laws passed under the notion that the fundamental dehumanization of the Virginia prisoner is that of jurisprudence and in the general sense due to the activity of Virginia's Social Contract, is. However the relative significance of jurisprudence as a counter point to the impunity of the dehumanization of the Virginia prisoner, lies with, the true, pure and quintessential nature of the accountability-function, which simply is the unfettered and truly liberated ability to hold government and its police powers, which the Virginia prison official is a function and operative to account or to compel that recognition of subordination to that "Of, By and For the people", which the Virginia Constitution asserts its authority from, with its declarations, starting with. ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS----A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS MADE BY THE GOOD PEOPLE OF VIRGINIA IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR SOVEREIGN POWERS,WHICH RIGHTS DO PERTAIN TO THEM AND THEIR POSTERITY, AS THE BASIS AND FOUNDATION OF GOVERNMENT [then it continues with] SEC.1 THAT ALL MEN ARE BY NATURE EQUALLY FREE AND INDEPENDENT AND HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT RIGHTS.......[in the spirit of JEAN ROUSSEAU and the theoretical kindred of THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 and its," MAN IS BORN FREE BUT EVERYWHERE I LOOK HE'S IN CHAINS"]. As such the existence of prison official impunity and its presumptions of above-the-lawism simply reveals the people's impotence and inability regardless of reason to subordinate their government's activities embodied by the Virginia prison official to their will and its accountability-function. This then matter of factly exposes that the character of Virginia's prison reform has a cognitive dissonance with the general and specific or particular order of which is primary and secondary, or which comes first. Meaning should we pursue enactment of laws at the expense of the accountability-function or means of their actual application as intended or anticipated or should we attain a actual means of holding the Virginia prison official accountable. An example of this is Virginia prison reform activism achieved a recent law at Virginia Code 53.1-39. 2, A 4 hour out of cell activity for the Virginia prisoner held in solitary confinement (under the euphemism, Restrictive or Restorative Housing) Va. Code 53.1-39 (1A), then the Virginia prison official at its Koncentration Kamp Red Onion State Prison and its other Charnel Kamps, promptly ignored it and kept on doing what they do, which is violate. Here is the rub, not only has the Virginia prison official, violated the law but they have exploited it as defense in lawsuits by claiming that its existence implies solitary is like General Population.

I have misgivings with recommending this below work as a comprehensive defense of my analysis on the Second aspect of prison reform in Virginia, on the simple fact it was produced at the present day, utterly craven Columbia University of New York. Yes, just as history saluted Columbia's vanguard heroics as being correct during the 1960's, so is its betrayals and complicities of 2025, by its administrative elements, indicted as that same ole same ole fleeing from the field, an infamous illustration of life imitating art, imagery of the seminal lyrics, "PICTURE ME BEING SCARED OF A N***A THAT BREATHES THE SAME AIR AS ME" by NOTORIOUS B.I.G. Nonetheless the work which is by LAURA FEELY, makes the point and case. The title of her work is DEFINING THE PUBLIC:ADMINISTRATIVE RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT IN THE CARCERAL CONTEXCT---54 COLUM. HUMAN RIGHTS L.REV. 368.The fact that our human condition is replete with contradictions and its Social Contract expression shimmers with hypocrisies isn't the exception but the rule and it takes the work of relentless analysis and implacable exposure to assert that yes we see that the "Emperor", no matter how strident the denials by those historical stooge and henchmen functionaries," has no clothes".In others words, the center of our antagonisms isn't holding and it isn't supposed to, which clearly defines that germane dynamic of the accountability-function of prison reform in Virginia. As I pointed out in the early part of this work, Virginia's prison reform work has this cognitive dissonance, of that philosophical, chicken or egg, distraction and the navel gazing contextual distortion of order of action, that only renders the status quo work of prison reform in Virginia as idealistic. I noted Ms. LAURA FEELY'S comprehensive work, "DEFINING THE PUBLIC...", because she tackles what after all is said and done with, is the main, primary and only question of REFORM, period. So how does what Ms. Feely is laboring at speak to prison reform? It is the crux of the issue, independent of context, because if our ancestors stated the obvious which is "Rights" or interactions and relationships are "Inalienable", then impediments, which per virtue of having to state the obvious, implies that there are, impositions and if we are honestly working to attain that accountability-function of realized humanness, then, basis of such impositions are irrelevant and the only relevance, is that of it's consequence. I'll use Columbia University's recent cravenness as example, which is simply this: on what terms can cravenness offer defense?. As such analysis is to, as it is specific to prison reform in Virginia, speak to the dialectic, which is reform and how to hold the prison official accountable, as such, what analysis reveals is not the logic of the prison official's impunity, but the fact that it exist and therefore what is permitting and enabling its existence. This then brings us to the understanding and fact that the impunity itself, is a structural lattice of Virginia's Government and its police powers again, regardless and irrespective of reason or logic, the consequence is impunity and we cannot speak of the just realization of Virginia's Social Contract, when despite that Inalienable sovereignty of its existence, it has the dehumanizing motive as Virginia law, THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ACT and we encounter it as the professional behavior of the Virginia prison official.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

PROTEST AS SPEECH FOR REFORM OF THE VIRGINIA PRISON CIRCUMSTANCE IS ALSO THIS By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

I will get right into it, The Commonwealth of Virginia is much more than its Three Branches of Government. It is primarily the established institutions The People of Virginia have established as means and mechanisms of what it means to realize themselves and the cultivation of its optimal environment. Government is primarily a coercive force, and no one welcomes coercion into anything and its will of the people is a clear articulated anticipation, "Of By and For The People" despite the fact that, at this moment of our social contract's existence, its primitive nature, circumscribes the anticipation as a practical purpose. Institutions establishing means of satisfying the people's aspirations are first and foremost, Ideas and not just a building and yes reform of Virginia's prison circumstance and its prison official is an idea and its satisfaction requires a maturity of engagement. Meaning the reform idea has to engage Virginians in spaces of ideas used to the habit of exchange. So Virginians conscious of the fact, that the aspired self-realization and the requisite cultivation of its optimal environment, is first and foremost a reform of Virginia's prison circumstance by returning the Virginia prison official to its rightful place of subordination to the will of The People of Virginia under equality of Law, have to meet fellow compatriot Virginians in spaces and places that have customarily speculated on and played around theoretically with self-realization and the cultivation of its optimal environment, but haven't actually appreciated its articulated anticipation, "Of, By and For The People", and pursued its attainment. The obvious places are Religious spaces and Virginia Colleges and Universities. We call on allies, families and friends of the Virginia Prisoner to reach out to religious leaders in their communities, for the purpose of speaking to and getting the point across to congregants, that the imprisonment of a Virginian, which is according to law, isn't then an excuse to violate law by dehumanizing the Virginia prisoner. This same message should be carried to campuses, through invites from college and university groups who for the most part are waiting on such activism. I have described a couple of mobilizing activities that are literal civic duties, because when government and its coercion, which the Virginia prison official is a function are held accountable, by subordination to the will of the people, that aspired, perfection of the unity of The People, is closer to realization. The existence and tolerance of impunity by government is its antithesis and the most destructive occurrence in the Social Contract. Because it corrodes the people's good will, it corrupts the people's trust in potential and capabilities, it as a final exertion negates humanness and replaces it with cynicism. What I'm also showing is protest has infinite character, because its only purpose is to expose and resolve antagonisms within the social contract that dehumanize. So, to the accountability-function of the Peoples Will, give us that breath of fresh air, that you are its operative, change the narrative of the Virginia prison circumstance and hold the Virginia prison official accountable.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982