By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
“Independent analysis of Virginia’s political culture, prisons, and state power.”
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
“My critique of my Moms is simply this: A Black Woman whose life experience occurred post the 1400’s.”
This is the only explicit mention of the 1400s in the post — but it is doing enormous conceptual work.
Thorpe is not using “1400s” as a date.
He is using it as a civilizational marker.
Thorpe’s use of “post the 1400s” is shorthand for:
The 1400s mark:
Thorpe compresses all of this into a single phrase.
In his 2024–2026 work, Thorpe argues that:
The 1400s are the moment when:
When he says his mother lived “post the 1400s,” he means:
She lived inside a world built by:
This is not biography.
This is historical indictment.
Thorpe avoids the usual American historical markers because:
“Post the 1400s” means:
He is placing his mother’s life inside a 600‑year global structure, not a 150‑year national one.
He is saying:
Racial domination is not a glitch.
It is the operating system.
This is the key move.
The exile to Texas (2019) and his mother’s life (1930s–2019) are both:
This is why the two traumas — her death and his exile — are fused in his memory.
Thorpe’s recent work argues:
The 1400s are the moment when:
So when he says his mother lived “post the 1400s,” he is saying:
She lived inside the same theological‑carceral world that now cages him.
This is not nostalgia.
This is genealogy.
Short answer:
Extremely rare. Almost no one uses the 1400s this way.
Long answer:
Historians and theorists often use:
But almost no one uses “post the 1400s” as a civilizational shorthand.
Thorpe’s usage is idiosyncratic, compressed, and rhetorical.
Some thinkers gesture toward similar timelines:
But none of them use the phrase the way Thorpe does.
Thorpe’s version is:
Almost unheard of.
Writers usually anchor to:
Thorpe bypasses all of that.
He goes straight to the root.
This gives the phrase enormous rhetorical force.
He is not saying:
“America failed its ideals.”
He is saying:
“America is the ideal — of a 1400s Christian‑imperial world.”
His mother’s life becomes:
The 2019 transfer is not a bureaucratic decision.
It is a 1400s event.
Inside today’s VAPAC post, the line:
“A Black Woman whose life experience occurred post the 1400’s.”
Current page
does three things:
Her suffering is not personal.
It is structural.
His suffering is not accidental.
It is structural.
Her death and his exile are not separate events.
They are two expressions of the same 600‑year system.
By vapac
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
A Deeper comprehensive analysis of Thorpes Judeo Christian Imprisonment scheme
What Thorpe Is Actually Doing in the “Dictates of Political‑Economy” SectionThorpe states that when Virginia’s imprisonment system emerged alongside the Industrial Revolution, it needed a justification narrative to hide its real purpose:
“concealing its actual intent which is political‑economical”
This is the thesis of the entire first movement of the essay.
He’s saying:
The prison is not a moral institution. It is an economic instrument.
And because economic instruments cannot admit their purpose (“we need to discipline labor”), they must be wrapped in a moral story.
Thorpe writes that political‑economy “requires a specific medium of establishing a hierarchy” that determines who gets access to the benefits of society
This is a classic political‑economy argument:
Thorpe’s point:
Imprisonment is the “stick” that enforces this hierarchy.
But the stick can’t appear as a stick — it must appear as “justice,” “morality,” “sin,” “crime,” or “public safety.”
Thorpe says the more a person’s life is tied to the production process, the more the system must “increase… the sophisticated nature of the mystifying narrative” to keep them compliant
This is a brutal insight.
He’s arguing:
In other words:
The more exploited you are, the more lies the system must tell you.
Thorpe writes that the “Justice Infrastructure and its Imprisonment scheme” speak in a mystifying narrative that hides its true intent, which he calls a “no holds barred dictatorship”
This is not rhetorical flourish — it’s structural analysis.
He’s saying:
So when the state says:
Thorpe hears:
Thorpe writes that pre‑industrial social behavior already had domination baked in, but the Industrial Age fused these ancient precepts into a new, more efficient system of control.
This is where he introduces the metaphor:
“The Carrot and the Stick had to get a garb upgrade… with a set of new colors.”
Meaning:
That modernized stick is imprisonment.
The Core Insight of This SectionThorpe is arguing that imprisonment is the first-born child of industrial political‑economy, not of theology, morality, or public safety.
The system needed:
So it created:
This is why he calls imprisonment:
“a no holds barred dictatorship of its intent.”
The “intent” is not justice.
The “intent” is not morality.
The “intent” is not theology.
The intent is political‑economic control.
What Makes This Section So ImportantThis is the foundation for everything that comes later:
All of it rests on this early claim:
Imprisonment is a political‑economic technology disguised as moral necessity.
By vapac