THIRD SUNDAY IN MAY IS VIRGINIA PRISONERS DAY: 2026 STATEMENT FROM VAPAC

On May 21st, 2023 We at VAPAC inaugurated the principle of VIRGINIA PRISONERS DAY, with the format which we still continue in 2026, as its motive force, being a Virginia People's affair. Meaning, instead of a centralized, top down marshalling and regimentation of action, Family, Friends and allies of the Virginia Prisoner, who are proximately closest and most intimate with the Virginia Prisoner, with shared interests, desires and determinations must be the ones, to formulate and encapsulate how to mark The Virginia Prisoners Day and in this we established the principle. All of us at VAPAC have family and loved ones under Virginia's imprisonment scheme, we all have our very own experiences dealing with Virginia's imprisonment scheme, whether personally through the various points of interaction with the Virginia Department of Corrections or from accounts and narratives from our imprisoned loved ones and as a matter of fact in this we share a commonality with victims of crime, despite the fact conventional wisdom works double overtime under the manipulation of politicians who exploit the pain and harm of crime, to maintain an insidious and idealistic wedge between Family of Prisoners and victims of the harm of crime, in all its forms, not just its selective and politically exploited accentuation. Accordingly on the Third Sunday in May Virginia Prisoners Day we sharpen our focus, strengthen our resolve to continue in the work of speaking up for the constant and consistent reform of Virginia's Justice Infrastructure and the imprisonment scheme and holding the Virginia Prison Official accountable, as such we again stand in Solidarity and Strength raising our voice for accountability and reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme. We also recognize that there might come a time in the future, where, the Family, Friends and Allies of the Virginia Prisoner will find it necessary and sensible to organize the Virginia Prisoners Day in a more centralized orientation, we leave it to that moment. Also We at VAPAC want to currently introduce another point of focus for this 2026 Virginia Prisoners Day, as we mark it, which is we should also identify those Virginia politicians and legislators who seem not to ever get enough of the hypocrisy of exploiting the issue of Virginia Prison Reform by standing in it's way. So Family, Friends and Allies of the Virginia Prisoner, let's stand and raise our voice on this 2026 Virginia Prisoners Day for Reform and adherence to the Accountability-function of the governance of the Commonwealth of Virginia of the Justice Infrastructure and the Imprisonment Scheme.

#VaPrisonersDay #MayVAThirdSunday . IN STRENGTH---VAPAC

PRISON REFORM IN VIRGINIA AND THE ROLE FOR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND ALLY: A LEAD By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Okay the question isn't whether reform is a must because as soon as that first Human Being was subjected to the condition of the organized violence of Imprisonment, the dialectic of its reform was also birthed. The only question the various Social Contracts of the Human Condition contend with are terms of the reform. So in the Commonwealth of Virginia the dynamic of Prison Reform or in other words the Justice Infrastructure is an intrinsic permeating and animating value of the daily FACTS of the human business of existence, irrespective of to what degree its awareness is appreciated and all of this is what in another form is characterized as the secrets and mysteries of the machinery of accountability or that regardless of designation and name, Government. Well and here is where proximity asserts its significance, because, despite the function of our homosapien brain and its comprehensive interaction and interrogation of the environment, in other words the degree of paying attention and the accompanying presence of mind, without proximity or that immersion into that object of reform, (which its relevance to this work is the Virginia Prison and the role of family, friends and ally) our ability to arrive at that practicality of the reform, becomes just another speculative and idealistic endeavor or enterprise and we have too many of these experiences in our history to learn from, with the most recent addition as that farcical Parole reform law foisted by Del. Tony Wilt (R) along with the entirety of Virginia's Legislature, which by the way had its genesis from the short circuiting synapses of certain Virginia prisoners, who clearly epitomize and embody that adage of, "two wrongs don't make a right", because the wrongs of Virginia's Parole scheme sure as hell won't be fixed by a gimmick every single Virginia Politician and Legislator agreed with and voted for, when those same legislators won't and can't agree on a simple and basic truth that the President of the United States is a convicted felon and adjudged sexual assaulter and we are supposed to hurrah in satisfaction that those minds and hearts and the resulting judgement gave us reform of a reluctance to break away from a scheme and its ahumanistic and dehumanizing origins?.So with that said and with what it instructs that, proximity permits that honesty necessary for reform and not exploitive gimmicks, what, then confronts us in this work of reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, is to achieve that critical proximity and proximity in this context has nothing to do with a type of material condition, for example, imprisonment. Because as we have been shown by that Tony Wilt law and its prisoner collaboration, prisoners are equally capable of comprising interest. So proximity then has to be appreciated from the vantage of opposition to within the Social Contract construct, a dehumanizing formulation, which even the most backwards Virginia Republican reactionary acknowledges that the dynamic of Virginia's imprisonment scheme is dehumanization. So what role family, friends and ally of the Virginia prisoner can then perform which then assumes, a practicality that currently isn't present in and absent from work that is already being done? There isn't a one absolute response, but an approximate one that factors in the speech or activity of the socio-person of the categories we are focusing on. HAVE WE CONSIDERED THE EFFECT A GROUPING OF OUR 15 to 25 year old DEMOGRAPHIC OF PRISONER FAMILIES, FRIENDS AND ALLIES ORGANIZING AROUND SPECIFIC VIRGINIA PRISON ISSUES, THEN PRODUCING DECLARATIONS WILL HAVE?

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

EVEN IN GOD, THE EXISTENCE OF THE DEVIL UNDERSCORES THE ABSENCE OF UNANIMITY----SO WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT THE UNANIMITY OF VIRGINIA LEGISLATORS INFERNALLY BIRTHING THE LAW HB-1030 AS ANOTHER ANTI-PAROLE GIMMICK By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

I analyzed HB-1030 in an earlier work, as "........ANOTHER TIRED BRICK IN THE WALL". At that time Governor Abigail Spanberger hadn't acted upon it, but as of now HB-1030 is Virginia Law to be implemented on July 1,2027 and only the insidious or enfeebled brain will claim it in any justifiable and legitimate manner. Yes it is the brain child of a couple of Virginia prisoners and no where is it mandated that only Republican voters suffer the acting against their interests neurosis, prisoners are also quite capable of anti self-interest speech. This work isn't to go back over why HB-1030 is a fraudulent and Frankenstein creation. Instead what I intend on doing is emphasizing that one and only fundamental point, which in all things Social Contract, is systemically veneered over and there is nothing more systemic than human behavior and it's just as equally systemic idealistic consequence and response, because the alternative, which Virginia Legislators under the Republican worldview of Del.Tony Wilt-R-34th District have just again compromised and eviscerated, is to actually and unconditionally embrace the critical process of what is in the general interest of that a priori and primary enterprise of the human business of existence. No one and I emphasize no one expects and anticipates omniscience, hell regardless of it's canned and exploited sophistry not even the Jeffersonian "nature's God" lays claim to omniscience or we wouldn't encounter for instance, the "WHEN, IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS," speech, so if the very fact of human existence and condition are approximate circumstances, why would Mr. Tony Wilt and his Virginia legislator brethren give us the gimmicks of presumptions on issues as cut to the bone and fundamental as crime and the repair of the caused harm, which the dynamic of parole is an inevitable vector? Because say what you will about human nature, the anticipatory motive of accountability, meaning how do we improve on a fact is ever present notwithstanding the nihilism of Mr. Wilt's Conservative World-View and its idealistic stagnancy. As such the fact that, regardless of ones narcissistic certitude, nothing, no judgement, no conclusion, no determination is ever final and complete and this nature of relations accordingly intimated at the utility and legitimacy of Parole as aspect of a justice infrastructure and the intention of repairing harm to fellow human and under the terms of the Social Contract, the Socio-person which the Commonwealth of Virginia recognized it's mitigative effects as structural lattice for the existence of a stable and salutary environment for the pursuit and maintenance of the human business or work of existence. I BEGIN: Del. Tony Wilt-R-34th District, in regards to HB-1030 is attributed to having made these comments, in a recent WHSV-Richmond article. "We spend a lot of energies, a lot of money and educating, providing educational opportunities for our inmates to educate them "[and it continues] "If we're looking towards the point, the time that they might no longer be [incarcerated], they would be back out in the public that they have something tangible that can help carry them through". [and it continues] Wilt reportedly also said " Public Safety remains a key concern with the new bill [HB-1030]" and "that not everyone [prisoners] will be fit for release".What the above excerpts convey are ideology and dogma.

When we speak of narcissistic certitude, the above excerpted comments attributed to Mr. Wilt are prime exhibits. Because nothing conveyed by them, indicates even begrudgingly an inkling that Virginia's imprisonment scheme with Parole, isn't a step child but a favored first born. In other words the imprisonment scheme is an approximation, which its many mitigative fronts as Virginia's Due Process of Law from, appellate review, to exonerations through Parole, Pardons and Commutations, even that final, arbiter, the Speech of Social Upheaval, prove and justify. So the only way we can access Mr. Wilt's comments on the motive of his HB-1030, Parole Law is through the nihilistic dogma of his Conservative ideology and World-View and despite the fact that it's typecast interpretation of the human condition is what passes as analysis in the Commonwealth's terms of its Social Contract, it's distortions, deceptions and idealistic delusions are still that, whether wielded in Virginia's antebellum political-economy or its current and contemporary formulation, it is still serving and pursing its historical intent. First of all Mr. Wilt's World-View doesn't have any ground as basis to orient any critique of anything from, when it is simply incapable of pointing out the simple truth, that selective criminalization despite, its historically tolerated existence becomes nemesis to that Social Contract requisite of the Peoples "faith and trust" in the accountability-function of Due Process of Law, when it reaches and attains the critical mass of brazenness that as a People we are Nationally subjected to. Because the only way the Wilt World-View can square pronouncements on Virginia's imprisonment scheme relative to the HB-1030 monstrosity is the imprisoned attains another status of being that isn't human and without value to both the human condition and as Social Contract socio-person. Now under the speech of Virginia's antebellum political-economy such hypocrisies and delusions had value in maintaining its super structure, because when all the forearms in the trough are washing off blood who will dare comment on the gore. In other words due to the shared dehumanizing dialectic who would be that pot calling the kettle black, which is what we find in this ongoing characterization of "justice and repair of harm".What we have is the Virginia Department of Corrections being the highest expression of the Commonwealth of Virginia's Productivity. Now if we are to carry Mr. Wilt's thought as stated in his " We spend a lot of energies, a lot of money and educating, providing educational opportunities for our inmates to educate them", to a logical metric, then the next formulation is why isn't this "lot of energies, a lot of money and educating" done before that possibility and probability of imprisonment?. Secondly as we trudge along with Mr. Wilt, we find his, "If we're looking towards the point, the time that they [prisoners] might no longer be [incarcerated], they would be back out in the public that they have something tangible that can help carry them through". Studying Mr. Wilt's comments you can't help but see how teeth pulling all of it is for him, he's clearly uncomfortable. Still though Mr. Wilt is no more prescient or sagacious than the most basic and frazzled Virginia psychology dealing with the daily contradictions and antagonisms of the Social Contract, which is the only denominator we hold his World-View to account, because, again if his HB-1030 parole law is lattice for construct of the Virginia socio-person, then why isn't it applied to the pre-imprisoned ?

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

TWO FORMULATIONS OF SPEECH AS VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

There are those who hold the position that SPEECH isn't in the first class of Human Activity and that stuff we do with our limbs isn't and shouldn't be characterized as SPEECH, well I disagree, because SPEECH regardless, the vantage of interrogation is a priori and quintessential ACTIVITY. I BEGIN: The Commonwealth of Virginia is constituted on a proposition of Human Activity, as fundamentally that realization of the business of human existence and being as organizationally impelled. The Commonwealth of Virginia in this aspect isn't unique, because that is the general nature of life impelled. However considering the fact that my work and focus is on reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, my scrutiny is on Virginia's myriad and variegated expressions of its constituted Speech as business of human existence. When we speak of "beginnings", generally it induces misconceptions or a fun house mirror image distortion, because the actuality and its correctness that we assume definition, is not being described on the honesty that our words, only approximate a grasp of behavior that require quantum appreciation, as such what happens is a construct of suppositions, that we sub, un or consciously, due to that homeostatic impelling must now defend as absolute, which in fact is quite hilarious, buffoonish and revelatory of that human natural state of defensively weaponizing revelling in ignorance as hedge against the self-consciousness, or indictment, that our behavior and attitude belie and are at the expense of the awareness that our conclusions assume quantum vantage. So with this in mind, meaning, if a beginning is merely an approximate construct, then our applications of exactitude, certitude and the jurisprudential process of Law have to be tempered in accord, because what it tells us is the process of human business, preceding and antecedent is the accountability-function as proof of the Systemic critique. Those self-conscious revelers in the ignorance of opposing Virginia prison reform, formulate speech, that stands at odds with for example this, "THE VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THAT THE POLICE POWER OF THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NEVER BE ABRIDGED. Va. Const. Art. IX sec.6.THE POLICE POWER IS BEST DESCRIBED AS THE COMMONWEALTH'S INHERENT POWER, AS A SOVEREIGN TO ENACT LAWS TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH, PEACE, MORALS, EDUCATION AND GOOD ORDER OF THE PEOPLE AND TO LEGISLATE SO AS TO INCREASE THE INDUSTRY OF THE STATE, DEVELOP IT'S RESOURCES AND ADD TO ITS WEALTH AND PROSPERITY" [quoted from ARCHER v.VA. BD.OF DENTISTRY 2026 Va App. Lexis 114].What this ARCHER quote again shows is if a formulation is approximate, meaning its substance and terms are always developing, becoming more clear and in focus implying a robustness of debate as process of reform, then everything about Virginia as constituted speech speaks to the substance of reform as revealed through the class of Virginians most embodying that constituted speech, which stands as LAW. What I'm saying is something more than the assertion that the Virginia prisoner is "subject of law", what I'm saying is the Virginia prisoner is the class most lawful. This isn't contradictory. If Virginia's constituted SPEECH is Law and the one class of Virginians most intimately proximate to it are Virginia prisoners, because it created them, then they are the most lawful.

I recognize how discordant this fact, that the imprisoned person is the most Lawful of all the Classes of Society and as it relates to this work, Virginia's Social Contract and that is exactly the point. Because it isn't that the Virginia socio-person isn't capable of understanding and attaining the cognition of the correctness of THE SPEECH FORMULATION constituting Virginia, but they're not called upon to grasp that SPEECH is the driver, despite the fact that it is the arbiter of daily existence as socio-person, in other words suppositionary definitions and determinants then surrogately present that fun house mirror image distortion of THAT ALL SO REAL SPEECH FORMULATION, which then enables that petty-tyranny expressed as, in this instance the impunity and above-the-lawism of the Virginia prison official and the general corruption of the system or Social Contract, which is subsequently critiqued as an inherency. Before I continue let me give you how BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY defines, LAWFUL: Not contrary to law permitted by law [and it continues under LEGAL and LEGAL is defined as Of or relating to law falling within the province of law. 2 Established, required, or permitted by law.3. Of or relating to law as opposed to equity].Now no one struggles with the fact that Society or the Social Contract is constituted Law, meaning everyone falls under the ambit of law, every aspect, fact, interaction and activity are artifacts of law, even when an act is at odds with it, the reason the act is at odds is because of Law and not because of its commission. What Law characterizes is context which is a primary denominator of the Human Condition and the business of existence. What I'm showing is despite the fact that we are not called upon to be as comprehensive in our daily grasp of the basic formulations of the Social Contract, which by the way, the process of formative education or critical analysis is intended to inculcate and should instinctually orient our daily speech, but due to the shortsightedness of reaction and its one-dimensional pursuit of value exploitation, under the analogous thought, that the less we as the socio-person critically think the easier or efficient it is to Capitalize our existence, its habit of taking stuff for granted as if definitions, descriptions, characterizations, contextualization are a result of...[Genesis 2:19 and 20]...when the fact is regardless of whatever the biblical Genesis and its kindred plays in ones existence, it doesn't absolve the responsibility of correctly understanding that the Commonwealth of Virginia is constituted SPEECH and the quality of it's human business of existence or the socio-person's is defacto dependent on understanding and cognition. So even as the individual Virginia socio-person might not ascribe to and will even react to certain attitudes and characterizations as viscerally vile and offensive, those vile and anathema attitudes are being perpetrated in their name. We see this rampantly present in the SPEECH of VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME. So even as it is generally accepted that, Due Process of Law Mandates of Virginia and United States Constitutions have a real and substantial anticipation and expectation, meaning the accused must have Legal Representation, see how Virginia's Governance handled this fact..."THE STATE OF VIRGINIA ARGUED IN BOUNDS THAT PROVIDING LAW LIBRARIES TO INMATES IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY, GIVEN THAT PRISON WRIT WRITERS ARE " ILLEQUIPPED. TO USE THE TOOLS OF THE TRADE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION".YET,IN GIARRATANO, VIRGINIA ARGUED THAT LAW LIBRARIES CAN BE USED EFFECTIVELY BY THESE SAME PRISONERS". [excerpted from MURRAY v. GIARRATANO: A REMEDY REDUCED TO A MEANINGLESS RITUAL pub. in 39 Am.U.L.Rev.765 by GERALDINE SZOTT MOOHR. What I'm showing with these excerpts as representative of TWO FORMULATIONS OF SPEECH AS VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME, is simply that impunity and its above-the-lawism isn't specifically an administrative process of bureaucracy run wild, but its a dynamic of inattentiveness and a second guessing by the People of Virginia in whose name everything has its approximate beginnings. In other words authority is first and foremost a dictatorship irrespective of formulation, which the context of formulation is how revelatory is the mechanism of the dictatorship. What I'm stressing is, yes there is substantial meaning in the description of Virginia's constituted speech, which we encounter in ARCHER v. VA. BD. of DENTISTRY 2026 VA.APP.LEXIS 114 as long as We The People of Virginia recognize it as such, [and here is we find dictatorship], because how are we as the people grasping and understanding... "THE COMMONWEALTH'S INHERENT POWER AS SOVEREIGN"[?], because "sovereign" stands firstly as singular and as soon as there is interaction, meaning once we encounter another human who is also sovereign, now we have an association or a cognizable and contextualized social contract, the basis of the interaction or association is of less significance, it could even be fatal, what is relevant nonetheless is it was SPEECH or ACITIVITY and this is that granular or quantum grasp which in order to compel, reform and for the specific focus of this work, reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, we must appreciate and function within its clarity. Everything elucidated and instructed in ARCHER as the Sovereign Police Powers of The Commonwealth of Virginia are specific and substantial basis demanding and commanding reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, yet its opponents exist causing the one and only question on what Right? Because the current state and condition of Virginia's imprisonment scheme is absolutely incompatible with the contextualization of its Police Powers, that stands first and foremost on the incontrovertible fact that the imprisoned Virginian is a Human Being and Sovereign. Because negating this fundamental fact isn't denial or abrogation of the humanness of the imprisoned Virginian, but rather it only reveals the value of Virginia's Speech or Virginia's Social Contract isn't to be trusted. Virginia's Social Contract is corrupt, Virginia's Social Contract is merely a perverted Supremacist construct a step ahead of its inexorable and inevitable accounting and we see it, in formulations of Speech or Activity that can only be classified as schizophrenic. From the Speech of the Virginian Thomas Jefferson of the Declaration of Independence authorship, whose declarations conversed his hypocrisies back to him revealing the context of a "sound mind" is also the purview of a diseased one. What was the value of the enslaved Africans to Jefferson and his ilk, wasn't it the fact they were Human? Even as the Jeffersonian world view denied it ?.My contention is we see the same thing with the Virginia Prisoner treated as "subject" of Law, when the quintessential formulation of the Speech reveals and points to the irrefutable fact that if Virginia's Speech is Constituted Law then the only class of Virginian embodying it is the Prisoner.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

ATTENTION FAMILY AND FRIENDS OF VIRGINIA PRISONERS By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

I'm on record for being critical of Virginia Law School's and Legal Scholars for their apathy and neglect in critiquing the Professional Behavior and Practices of the Virginia Prison Official and its implicit analysis of Virginia's Social Contract and I stand unopposed in the criticism. Nonetheless Legal elements representing interstate Legal Academia have produced extensive work critiquing the Politics of Imprisonment, which includes Virginia's. Listed below are a listing of Titles, Journals the works are published in which can be accessed either on the Net or Legal Clinics and authors. What Families and Friends of the Virginia prisoner can do is share this list with them and by the way this list is relevant to all Prisoners across the Nation for those who want to attain that necessary and deep understanding of the Social Contract basis of the Justice Infrastructure and Imprisonment scheme. Also I ask that Prisoner Families and Friends read and study these works because it isn't just about us Prisoners in these cages. BELOW IS THE LIST.

INVOLVING INCARCERATED PEOPLE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS pub.in 59 U.Rich.L.Rev. 787 by DANNY ZEMEL DUE PROCESS IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT: IT'S TIME TO OVERRULE SANDIN AND REVISE WILKINSON pub.in 101 Neb. L. Rev. 487 by RUSSELL E. LOVELL II CRUEL, UNUSUAL, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL: AN ORIGINALIST ARGUMENT FOR ENDING LONG TERM SOLITARY CONFINEMENT pub.in 56 Am.Crim.L.Rev.1759 by MERIN CHERIAN BEYOND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: SOLITARY CONFINEMENT AND DIGNITARY INTERESTS pub.in 68 Ala.L.Rev.1117 by SHELBY CALAMBOKIDIS [who knew Univ. of Alabama had a Law Journal also its cited in APODACA v. RAEMISCH 586 U.S.931] CACERAL INTENT pub.in 27 Mich. J- Race and L.323 by DANIELLE C. JEFFERIS THE UNKNOWNS OF THE KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT: REVISITING THE DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE STANDARDS IN PRISONER HEALTHCARE pub.in 115 J. Crim. L. and Criminology 715 by MALINA J. SIMARD-HALM ANATOMY OF LEGAL IMMUNITY: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY IN PRISON HEALTH CARE pub. in 28 Quinnipiac Health L. J. 177 by AJOKE M.ADETULA THE OBVIOUS VIOLATION EXCEPTION TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY pub.in 99 Wash. L .Rev.725 by BAILEY D. BARNES THE PUZZLE OF PRISONERS AND RIGHTS:AN ESSAY IN HONOR OF FRANK JOHNSON pub.in 71 Ala. L. Rev. 665 by JUDITH RESNIK LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE AS DEATH WITHOUT DIGNITY pub. in 72 Ala. L. Rev.327 by BRITTANY L. DEUTCH [cited in DORSEY v. SMITH 975 N.W.2d 356] TAKING CORRIGIBILITY SERIOUSLY pub. in 28 Berkeley J. Crim. L 35 by DORA W.KLEIN EXCESSIVE SENTENCING REVIEW: EIGHTH AMENDMENT SUBSTANCE AND PROCEDURE pub.in 132 Yale L .J. F. 75 by MATT KELLNER INSIDE AMERICA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: THE SUPREME COURT ON THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED AND THE INCARCERATED: KEYNOTE ARTICLE: THE MODEST EFFECT OF MINNECI v. POLLARD ON INMATE LITIGANTS pub.in 46 Akron L. Rev. 287 by ALEXANDER VOLOKH SOUND PRINCIPLES, UNDESIRABLE OUTCOMES: JUSTICE SCALIA'S PARADOXICAL EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE pub.in 50 Akron L. Rev. 301 by MIRKO BAGARIC and SANDEEP GOPALAN PREGNANT IN CAPTIVITY: ANALYZING THE TREATMENT OF PREGNANT WOMEN IN AMERICAN PRISONS AND IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTERS pub.in 71 Ala. L .Rev. 867 by WESLEY SMITHART WOMEN'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: PROMISE AMID PERIL, PREA'S EFFORTS TO REGULATE AN END TO PRISON RAPE pub.in 57Am.Crim. L. Rev. 1599 by BRENDA V. SMITH 

EXPANDING ACCESS TO MEDICATIONS FOR OPIOD USE DISORDER IN THE CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM BEYOND PRISONS AND JAILS pub.in 62 Am. Crim. L. Rev.1213 by JOSEPH K. LONGLEY.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982