HOLDING THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABLE IS MORE THAN VOTING IN POLITICIANS WHO WILL PERFORM OVERSIGHT, BUT HOW COMPREHENSIVE AN UNDERSTANDING WE HAVE OF THE SOCIAL CONTRACT By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

So, in response to work titled, THE SAVAGERY AND BARBARISM OF THE AMERICAN PRISON SYSTEM HAS PRODUCED GIANTS IN OPPOSITION...... which I assume came from a mind and heart sharing and having affinity with the savagery and barbarism, this was and I paraphrase stated, what did the work have to do with Virginia prisoners committing suicide. Now do I think that a Virginia prison official under a pseudonym, made the comment as a distraction from the fact that the imprisonment scheme, Virginia's or Nationally, is pure unadulterated savagery and barbarism, is besides the point. But what the comment does is present opportunity for focus on and a highlight of an aspect we seemingly and virtually fail to consider and even when it nibbles at the back of our mind, we take it for granted. What I'm talking about is the degree to which we are practically ignorant of the THOUGHT or construct of the SOCIAL CONTRACT or THE SYSTEM. Now let's just take it on face value that the commentator speaking of prisoner suicide is actually oblivious to the connection savagery and barbarism has on also inducing suicide, which the Supreme Court of The United States in 1890, in a moment of honesty and unbiased reasoning, noted in the case IN RE MEDLEY 134 U.S 160, that prisoners in solitary confinement and I quote, "committed suicide". This is what Jurist of the highest Court in the land said in 1890 and not even the most vile and incorrigible Prison Official will dare argue that solitary confinement isn't a savage and barbaric condition, but my focus is on more than stating the obvious. What I ask of us in this work of reforming Virginia's imprisonment scheme, is we have to actually grasp the construct of Virginia's Social Contract, in order to recognize that the accountability-function of governance is much more than legislative action, because for one a Supreme Court whether a States' or Federal can null and void legislative action, which the only Accountability available is that of the fundamental grasp of the People, which essentially is to what extent the People are capable of activating that "Speech", of the Emperor has no clothes. In other words, when the dynamic of governance stands gloriously naked and to a degree the Supreme Court of Hawaii in the case GRANILLO v. STATE 2026 HAW.LEXIS 179, in the writings of Justice Todd W. Eddins, has given us its schematic. Which simply is the activity of speech exposing. So, let's take the circumstance of Virginia prisoner suicide. For starters seldom do we see energetic speech from Family, Ally and Friends, cutting through the distractive and distortive noise of Virginia public discourse. Because complicity resulting in the suicides, isn't just due to the professional presence of the Virginia Prison Official as cause, but the very construct of Virginia's Social Contract and its lattice aspect, the gradient dehumanization of the socio-person. We see this in how the functionaries of Virginia's Social Contract, the Media, treat the fact of the prisoner suicide. Initially the media coverage, insidiously diminishes or down plays the suicide fact, then it matures to dismissing it with stunts as directing attention to and emphasizing whatever alleged convictions resulted in the imprisonment of the dead prisoner. This sort of media treatment is a result of bias enboldenment, serving a specific function, that of detouring fissure causing status quo criticism, which simply is the prisoner wasn't sent to prison to commit suicide. Then we have the silence from the Virginia Mental Health profession as complicity.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .

WE ARE NOT THE ONES DELEGITIMIZING THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL, THE INHERENT CORRUPTION OF THE CONSTRUCT IS IT'S REAGENT By William Thorpe

There is only one acknowledgement to be realized: Which is the Virginia Prison Official's subordination to the Peoples intention of the Accountability-Function of governance. I BEGIN: I will spare us the enterprise of critiquing the sham Speech, meaning the activity of Virginia's Social Contract prior to the emergence of RUFFIN v. COMMONWEALTH 62 VA.790 and simply stipulate, that the fatuous work of those 1871 Virginia Supreme Court Jurist examination of Virginia's Bill of Rights in RUFFIN clearly orients the corrupt inherency of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, which the Virginia prison official continues its embodiment. Whether or not I'm correct in characterizing the 1871 work of Virginia's Supreme Court in RUFFIN as fatuous isn't up to any honest debate and here is the basic fact, can a human or socio-person step outside of history? Of course not and simply having to state it shows how low it's bar of reason. Well that is exactly what those Virginia Jurist in 1871 ask us to accept, with their Bill of Rights excluding the Virginia prisoner jurisprudence and it's with that work does the inherent corruption of Virginia's imprisonment scheme stand pathetically laid bare and naked. Because you cannot say that human/socio-person's behavior is a construct of "law", then turn right around and "simply" proclaim that that creation of a construct of law, is all of a sudden outside of law and then introduce an arbiter, a summary dispensation of, to quote RUFFIN....."[S]such as the law in its benignity accords to them." This people is sophistry, a revelation of what law meant to and was understood by the Virginia Jurist of 1871, who naturally were either full members of the Commonwealth's elite or its support functionaries. Of course none of this Bi-Polarism of THOUGHT is novel, we encounter it over and over, time and time again. From the Virginia prison official's professional instinct of dehumanizing the Virginia prisoner, meaning seeing the prisoner as less than, while still expecting that the Virginia prisoner exhibit that most quintessential of humanness, which is the ability to comprehend, by exercising ability and capacity to understand, which in the context of the imprisonment scheme is prison rules, procedures, programs e.t.c, meaning the prisoner isn't less than, after all. To that other classic example of theorizing on Man's Liberty even as the practice of subjugation was reaching new dimensions with the creation of HOMO CHATTEL. Our human condition is replete with example after example of that inherent corruption as dialectical nemesis, when we are intent on holding it accountable. But when we are not we experience it as Southern enslavers accusing and "blaming" Northern Abolitionists for "instigating" ideas of freedom in the heads of the enslaved or the Virginia prison official having no refuge for the corrupt professional behavior of above-the-lawism, grasping the strawman logic that the People's intention and will of subordination to the accountability-function of governance is delegitimizing's delegitmization of the Virginia prison official is a fait accompli, revealed to the Virginia prisoner with every interaction with the Virginia prison official. All one has to do is peruse the chronicles upon chronicles of Court claims stating the sort of quite frankly disqualifying Virginia prison official behavior which Virginia law at Virginia code 19.2-83.6 and Virginia code 15.2-1707 are intended to respond to. When the prison official lies, contrives an infraction on a prisoner, denies a duty it's delegitimizing.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .

KIMBERLY SNODGRASS YOU SHOULDN'T BE THANKING ME, INSTEAD IT IS THE OTHER WAY AROUND, US, THE VIRGINIA PRISONER THANK YOU AND ALL OUR WOMEN WHO IN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER ARE IN OUR LIVES By William Thorpe

I started the day, today 8/19/26 listening to a call in Radio Show on Houston, Texas KPFT and the topic was on masculinity, something about how men are "dominating and putting women in their place". When I was growing up the term for that sort of thinking was "chauvinism", now its misogyny, both describe, what our ancients said, and I paraphrase, that philosophers have described the World, now its on us to change it. Because as I was listening to the various voices, female and male expressing ill formed, idiotic, backwards, with the thoughtful and enlightening thinking sprinkled in between, it captured that world description, minus the change it part. Even though I was able to reflect on when I have also been demeaning and derisive towards females as a cultural normalcy, I still, then recognized distinction, that yes I demeaned or insulted a specific female, even a clique of females, still I knew that WOMAN was to be respected and accorded dignity. Of course, my level of the respect and acknowledgement of dignity, reflected and was an expression of, what I then knew. I say all of this to say, the attitudes and perspectives I was hearing coming through my headphones this morning were to put it simply, alien. Especially when I juxtapose what I know about the typical Woman in the life of the American Prisoner, which to be specific, for purpose of this work, the Virginian Woman in the life of the Virginia Prisoner, against the ridiculous caricaturization of females, on the airwaves of Texas this morning. Before I begin, when I talk about the Woman in the life of the American prisoner. Let's take the legendary champion Women Basketball Player, MAYA MOORE, who is now Maya Moore-Iorns and if you're not familiar with her story, please take the time to delve. Because Maya Moore was an exceptional basketball player. She won Championship after Championship at the University of Connecticut and she continued winning when she turned pro with the Minnesota Lynx of the WNBA, whatever descriptive you can come up for her won't be enough. Then she gave it all up, she quit everything to devote and dedicate herself, the totality of her humanness, towards the work of freeing, JONATHAN IORNS a Missouri Prisoner, who she had come to the realization was falsely imprisoned. So Maya Moore did what the human being focused on a task does. As an end note to her story, not only did she accomplish her intention, but her last name is now, IORNS and they have to my knowledge a child. The behavior of Woman in the American Imprisonment Scheme isn't limited to Maya Moore as anecdote, but stories abound in all sorts of ways that speak to the incalculable strength of WOMAN to the American prisoner and this brings me to Virginia and KIMBERLY SNODGRASS. Recently Kim thanked me and,even though I understand where she's coming from, I still can't let it stand like that. Kimberly Snodgrass is a Mother who is dealing with the hell of having a Son imprisoned, while still having the mental, spiritual and emotional capacity to speak for us the Virginia Prisoner and she isn't by herself. From Stacey Thorpe, Michelle Griffin, Natasha White ,Fatimah Muwahhid, Dawn Bryant, Gaye Gardner to name just a pin drop of all our Virginia Women, who in small and large ways, with unfathomable strength, do what their humanness ask of them, not withstanding the tremendous obstacles thrown,tossed at them.The dehumanization they're subjected to because they dare say, Virginia prison official perform your duties lawfully. WE THANK YOU. 

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 

WHEN YOU VOTED FOR ABIGAIL SPANBERGER AS GOVERNOR, YOU TRUSTED HER JUDGMENT. WELL PEOPLE SHE'S ASKED FOR INPUT ON REFORMING VIRGINIA'S PRISON SYSTEM, THE LEAST TO BE DONE IS EMAIL IT By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

I BEGIN: When as prisoners we file requests, engage the Grievance process and or subsequently file law suits. We are in no uncertain terms saying, a condition must be changed, improved on or to make a long story short reformed. Here we are in 2026, there are a lot of Virginia prisoners who probably have heard about me, but don't know me personally, because when I was at the age a lot of 'em are now, waging daily battles with the Virginia prison official, they were not born. My saying this isn't to establish nothing besides: there isn't much about Virginia's imprisonment scheme, to me, that is nuanced or novel, save for something a politician, a Virginia Politician at that has recently done, which is when Governor Abigail Spanberger recently publicly asked for "input" on reforming the prison system. I write to say this, we have to acknowledge and recognize when energy is being infused and directed, where none existed prior and Governor Spanberger is infusing and directing energy at Virginia's imprisonment circumstance where none existed. Now there is criticism of Governor Spanberger, which reporter Sandy Hausman recently aired in an article, presenting the position held by those whose sentiments animated the article, that, the Governor hasn't done enough. I write to make one and only one point, which is, for the first time in Virginia's history and I'll be on solid ground to include our National history, that a sitting Governor, a current Politician has publicly asked the People for INPUT on reforming a prison system. Whether or not people's expectations and anticipations are completely met isn't the point. The point is, Governor Abigail Spanberger has validated Virginia prisoner's, Family, Ally and Friends claims that Virginia's imprisonment scheme must be reformed, with her "public" ask for INPUT and all serious minded Virginians, including prisoners, especially prisoners have to recognize its significance. Now to get into the mechanics of what the Governor is asking. It presents an unstated proposition. Which is, her ask is intended to debunk the anti-prisoner narrative, which goes like this: Politicians shouldn't spend political capital on reforming imprisonment, because no one really cares about prisoners, or there isn't political gain in its reformation. As I've already developed in another work on this topic, there are on the low or conservative side, 675,000 Virginians directly impacted by the life condition of the Virginia prisoner. So if 10% will express their concerns by contacting the Governor with INPUT, not only is that a consequential reality, but it now shows future politicians that speaking on imprisonment issues in the reform context are not political suicide but a win. Secondly, everything in our human condition is about "speech", and who is saying what. Speech creates space by legitimizing an issue with its elevation and there isn't a higher elevation or amplification of an issue than a Governor speaking on it. Governor Spanberger has done that. So now its on the People of Virginia to simply get on their key boards and tap out their concerns to the Governor. The approximately 45,000+ Virginia prisoner should remind family, ally and friends of this simple fact and that the cut off date is September 4th,2026 to email input, which also means views and concerns of the imprisonment scheme. Now here is also what is primary: despite, Governor Spanberger's speech on an issue doesn't in no form or manner define how we as the People grasp it. Governor Spanberger is a Governor with its own specific interests, We are the People, our interest encompasses hers.

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 

WHILE YOU WERE SLEEP AND HAND WRINGIN THE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAII WAS DRAWING A LINE IN THE SAND AGAINST THE TRUMP PACKED SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

I BEGIN: The Supreme Court of Hawaii was doing it's normal appellate function in a case GRANILLO v. STATE 2026 Haw. Lexis 179 on July 15, 2026. The case was about the 1990 conviction of Daniel R. Granillo for kidnapping and sexual assault. A FBI Agent Wayne Oakes provided expert testimony of scientific analysis that essentially convicted Mr. Granillo. Then in 2017, The United States Department of Justice informed Hawaiian Officials, that basically, FBI Agent Wayne Oakes expert testimony was false. Resulting in the Supreme Court of Hawaii ruling on July 15, 2026; that Mr. Granillo must be given a new trial. So, in writing the unanimous decision of the Court, Justice Todd W. Eddins, found cause to expose the fraudulent work of the Republicans and Conservatives on the Supreme Court of the United States in no uncertain terms that is basis of the title of this work and is germane to our work or reforming Virginia's imprisonment scheme. Maybe, there is precedent for Justice Eddins exposé, nonetheless it is invaluable and instructive, to our understanding of, Law, the Social Contract and it's political-economy, accordingly below I excerpt it.

"We are not side-stepping anything. We are doing what state constitutionalism ask us to do. Stand our ground.....We interpret the Hawaii Constitution on its own terms. The United States Supreme Court's construction of the Federal DUE PROCESS CLAUSE does not define the protection of our State's DUE PROCESS CLAUSE. This Court " reason[s] independently, untethered from the Supreme Court's analysis of the United States Constitution" STATE v. WILSON 154 HAWAII 8 (2024). The Court that now defines Federal Due Process does not honor the work of 1954. It revives the work of 1857.The work of 1896. The Constitution must be interpreted "according to its true intent and meaning when it was adopted". DRED SCOTT v. STANDFORD 60 U.S. 393 (1857). Today's hubristic originalists use the same method to control modern life. See CITY and CNTY. OF HONOLULU v. SUNOCO LP. 153 HAWAII 326 (2022) (EDDINS J. Concurring) ("A Justice's personal values and ideas about the very old days suddenly control the lives of present and future generations"). The Court overrides what Congress passed. It overrides what the People chose. All to serve it's own ends. What this Court has done to Constitutional rights, democratic institutions, and the rule of law explains why Hawaii's Constitution takes no instruction from it. Article I section 5 provides versatile and sovereign protection. The Court does not anchor Hawaii's Due Process rights to the Federal floor. Especially one that keeps sinking. We take no guidance on the meaning of Due Process from a court that gutted due process protections in DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORG. 597 U.S. 215 (2022) ZUFFANTE called it straight DOBBS erased a " generation-long constitutional right, stripping autonomy from half the population, and empowering States to force births" STATE v. ZUFFANTE 157 HAWAII 194 (2022). Article I section 5 does not import that results-driven approach to due process. We follow Principles, not Agendas.The Supreme Court's imperious ideology does not stop at Due Process. The same jurisprudence has created Democracy itself.Start with the Voting Rights Act.The Roberts Court did what Congress never would.It rewrote the VOTING RIGHTS ACT of 1965,a cornerstone of American Civil Rights,Democratically enacted and repeatedly reauthorized. SHELBY COUNTY v. HOLDER 570 U.S.529(2013),began the judicial demolition, inventing a textually unsupported equal-sovereignty fiction and striking down preclearance on a hunch that the law worked too well. BRANOVICH v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE 594 U.S. 647(2021),fabricated "guideposts" nowhere in SECTION 2 to greenlight racial discrimination in voting. LOUISIANA v. CALLAIS 146 S. Ct. 1231 (2026), buried what remained of the crown jewel of the Civil Rights movement. Pretend law for a real statute. The Court then ditched its own thirty-two day default for releasing decisions and hustled out its judgement mid-primary,a favor granted over objection only twice in twenty-five years. CALLAIS v.LOUISIANA 146 S.Ct.1111(2026) (JACKSON, J. dissenting). Weeks later, on it's shadow docket, the Court tossed an eleven-day trial record built on fifty-one witnesses,790 exhibits, 2,600 pages of testimony, and a 270-page opinion by a Three-Judge Court. See SINGLETON v. ALLEN 782 F.Supp.3d 1092 (N.D.Ala.2025). It resurrected a tainted congressional map the Three-Judge factfinders found deliberately entrenched racial bias against Black voters. ALLEN v. MILLIGAN 146 S. Ct 1377 (2026). see also HILO BAY MARINA v. STATE 156 HAWAII 478 (2025) (the "Courts" frequent misrepresentation of the factual record and it's throw-judges- under-the-bus disdain for District Courts, the fact finders of the Federal judiciary, harm the Justice System. The Roberts Court sees only white. It refuses to acknowledge who the EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE was written to protect. The freed people, their descendants, and all others denied equal citizenship. U.S. Const. Amend. XIV sec. I. It turns it's back on what is in plain sight. The FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT is not colorblind. It never was. The Court calls the Constitution colorblind while engineering the dilution of Black votes, the unraveling of hard fought civil rights remedies, and the erasure of Black History. That is not blindness. That is white sight, by design. A Constitution interpreted this way is not colorblind. It is whatever the Court needs it to be. A way to advance its partisan project. The damage to democracy extends beyond the Voting Rights Act. In CITIZENS UNITED v. FED.ELECTION COMM'N 558 U.S. 310 (2010), the Court claimed fidelity to text, history, and tradition while invalidating yet another democratically vetted law, handing corporations the same speech rights as flesh-and- blood Americans and letting dollars talk louder than voters. See SUNOCO 153 HAWAII at 362 (EDDINS, J. concurring) (originalism applies selectively and vanishes inconveniently) LEO E. STRINE, Jr. and NICHOLAS WALTER, ORIGINALISTS OR ORIGINAL: THE DIFFICULTIES OF RECONCILING CITIZENS UNITED WITH CORPORATE LAW HISTORY 91 NOTRE DAME L .Rev. 877 (2016) (CITIZENS UNITED cannot be reconciled with corporate law history). Other decisions followed. The Court abandoned partisan gerrymandering to the gerrymanderers, refusing for the first time to remedy a constitutional violation because it believed the task beyond judicial competence. RUCHO v. COMMON CAUSE 588 U.S.684 (2019) (KAGAN, J. dissenting). It placed a President above the law. TRUMP v. UNITED STATES 603 U.S.593 (2024). Last month, NAT'L REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMM.v. FEC 225 L.ED. 2d 998 (2026).Made CITIZENS UNITED look quaint, shredding coordinated spending limits Congress had enacted and ensuring that those who bankroll elections drown out the ordinary person. Billionaires spend to be repaid. Everyone else just votes. The Roberts Court has made sure one's wealth counts more than another's vote. Rulings run in one direction time after time. Weakening protections for those with less power. Fortifying those with more. The pattern speaks for itself. A court that systematically dismantles democratic safeguards, steamrolls constitutional liberties and tramples human dignity does not chart the course for the Hawaii Constitution. Our Constitualism system was designed for times like these. Federalism is not a formality. It is the architecture. The framers built dual sovereignty into the structure of American government as an independent check against concentrated Federal power. A Supreme Court driven by agenda and intent on swiping power that belongs to the people is exactly what that check was built for. When six Justices walk away from those they are supposed to protect, state constitutions hold the line. That is not defiance. That is the design. State Constitualism makes it easy to consider Roberts Court jurisprudence "white noise". See HILO BAY MARINA 156 HAWAII at 518. Add it all up. Draining Due Process. Rolling back voting rights. Flooding elections with money. Rubber stamping gerrymandering. Crowning a President. Blessing discrimination in the name of the Constitution. FULTON v. CITY of PHILADELPHIA, Pa. 593 U.S.522 (2021) 303 CREATIVE LLC. v. ELENIS 600 U.S.570 (2023).Looking at naked racism and seeing none of it. MULLIN v. DOE 225 L.ED.2d 594 (2026) ( racist words not "overtly racist").Making the country more dangerous with a SECOND AMENDMENT unmoored from text or history and unrecognizable to the framers who wrote it. NEW YORK STATE RIFLE and PISTOL ASS'N INC v. BRUEN 597 U.S.1 (2022), WILSON 154 HAWAII at 22 ("disabl[ing] the state responsibility to protect public safety, reduce gun violence, and safeguard peaceful public movement" with its deadly jurisprudence). Then striking down a carefull law and showing disdain for Hawaii's Constitutional traditions. WOLFORD v. LOPEZ 225 L. ED 2d 494 (2026). Subverting Congressional choices with a homemade "major questions" power grab that plays "get-out-of-text-free cards" to block agencies from doing what Congress told them to do.WEST VIRGINIA v. ENV'T PROT.AGENCY 597 U.S. 697 (2022) (KAGAN, J. dissenting). Then commandeering the interpretive authority Congress gave federal agencies, over ruling CHEVRON after forty years because to this particular Court, precedent is advisory. LOPER BRIGHT ENTERS. v. RAIMONDO 603 U.S.369 (2024). This term, transmuting Federal spending programs into private contracts, the Court forced the SPENDING CLAUSE to "reduce some of Congress greatest legislative achievements" LANDOR v. LOUISIANA DEP'T of CORR. and PUB.SAFETY 225 L.ED.2d.394 (2026) (JACKSON, J. dissenting). Days later, it freed the President to fire at will the very Commissioners a law sheltered from removal, discarding a unanimous opinion, HUMPHREY'S EXECUTOR on a cherry-picked slice of history-a century of settled practice recast as a mistake, competent governance sacrificed to the partisan cause. TRUMP v. SLAUGHTER 225 L.ED.2d 664 (2026). The next morning, fair-weather textualists-living constitution originalists, really-deserted the text and our Nation's history the moment it promised citizenship, one vote from writing that right out of the Constitution. TRUMP v. BARBARA 225 L.ED. 2d 876 (2026). That's not all life tenure and zero accountability have produced lately. But its enough. Article I. Section 5 needs no part of this. The Hawaii Constitution was built to stand on its own. And so it does" [excerpted GRANILLO v. STATE 2026 HAW.LEXIS 179,,JUSTICE TODD W.EDDINS WRITING THE UNANIMOUS OPINION]. As I initially stated Justice Eddins words are extremely instructive for our reform work of Virginia's imprisonment scheme and it is also fundamentally revelatory to our understanding. What Justice Eddins words speak to is that maxim, history is written by the victor or told from the conquerors point of view. Which as maxim isn't only applicable to conquest, but as insight, lengths are travelled by in whose interest, to conceal such. Because the operative is, who will SPEAK. Again, what Justice Eddins words reveal is, as long as the reaction is silence then, the maxim of the "victor", or as it applys to our reform work, the status quo claiming the narrative is then self-fulfilling. All Justice Eddins said about the Supreme Court of the United States is correct, just as what we say about the Virginia prison official.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982