VIRGINIA PRISONERS ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES EXPOSING THE LAW VIOLATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,SEE WHAT IT'S OWN EMPLOYEES ARE SAYING IN COURT ABOUT THEIR UNCONSCIONABLE EXPERIENCES By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

In a recent work, titled, VIRGINIA REPUBLICANS/CONSERVATIVES/MAGA AND LAW VIOLATIONS BY THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL.I made the point that the work of holding the Virginia Prison Official accountable needs unimpeachable facts that go beyond the abuse and dehumanization of the Virginia Prisoner. Now just making this point shows and is revelatory of how the cognizance and understanding of the Constituted aspirations of The People of The Commonwealth of Virginia has been deliberately, purposefully assailed and insidiously degraded by the generality of impunity and its concurrent exacerbation and utility of weaponizing the, and ensuring disunity among the people, due to the strategy of conditionality of access to the Due Process of Law and its Equality wielded by the Commonwealth's reactionary elements and forces, specifically the Virginia Republican, Conservatives and their currently manifested Maga spasming, allied with among others, the Virginia prison official as representative and reflective of the actual function of Virginia's Justice Infrastructure, as a pining for a savage, decrepit and counterintuitive political-economy formulation, that has no more a claim to purpose, than a mere fleeting hedonistic gratuitous violence and its name is sadism. In other words Virginia's Social Contract is a rudderless vessel lurching hither, thither in the tempest of impunity, which then is the environment, the work of wrangling the accountability-function of governance on the above-the-lawism of the Virginia prison official, is engaged on. In pursuit of perverting the Constituted aspirations of the People of The Commonwealth, its foot soldiers, the usual reactionaries have successfully associated the work of the equity of equality under law and its anti-impunity function of holding the Virginia prison official accountable, as "being soft on crime", as such the Virginia prison official can be caught red handed committing the most egregious violation against the imprisoned Virginian and the Republican and Conservative ally will be trotted out, spouting and spewing the most inane comments in it's defense and the Virginia citizenry, by being inoculated against recognizing that the prison official's professional behavior is pure, simple and unbridled criminality, compromising the necessary faith and trust they have to have in the Rule of Law will bristle against being reminded that it is. So what the work of holding the Virginia prison official accountable requires is a more complete and practical narrative that reveals and exposes the systemic impunity of the Virginia Department of Corrections from its own employees. Listed are some claims in court actions by employees, ranging from sexual assaults, gender discrimination, hostile work environment, employee on employee assault, racism and all-around egregious behavior.

ALCAZAR v. Va. Dept.of Corr.2024 U.S. Dist. Lexis 156850 PATTERSON v. Va .Dept.of Corr.2024 U.S. Dist. Lexis 72197 BLACKSHEAR v. Va. Dept. Corr. 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 264460 GEORGE v. BROWN 2025 U.S. Dist. Lexis 259131 [pay ATTN.to the behavior of Sgt. BROWN] Va. Dept. of Corr .v. COMPTON 47 VA.App.202 HALEY v. Va. Dept. of Corr. 2023 VA. App. Lexis 493 COMMONWEALTH v. NEEDHAM 55 VA. App.316 Va. Dept. of Corr. v. BISHOP 75 VA. App.1 SPICER v. VIRGINIA 66 F.3d 705 FLORES v. Va Dept .of Corr.2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 31857

KNOSKIE v VA Dept of Corr 2017 U.S. V Dist. Lexis 22719

McCURDY v. Va Dept of Corr 2016 U.S. Dist. Lexis 169611

McCURDY v, Va Dept of Corr 2017 U.S. Dist Lexis 142788 The People would know about these if our Media did their job.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

VIRGINIA REPUBLICANS/CONSERVATIVES/MAGA AND LAW VIOLATIONS BY THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL By William Thorpe

Virginia Republicans/Conservatives/Maga are yet to encounter law violations by The Virginia Prison Official in their professional behavior that causes them to "act" like they remember that they are the ones who perennially claim to be all about "law and order", which is a sneaky, sleight of hand way of deceiving the People of the Commonwealth, that, law and order means anti-impunity and its equality under law thesis. But the truth and reality is the Virginia Republican/Conservative and Maga have a more backwards and insidious characterization and motive of and for their "law and order" parrot, which has nothing to do with the left to the people to swallow its hook and sinker, self-checking utility by having them fill in its definition blanks, according to The People's naveté, biases, fears, ignorances, illiteracy, suppositions and that ever present, self-interest. In other words, the Virginia Republican "law and order" polemic is your classic Rorschach test. I BEGIN: In our work of holding the Virginia prison official accountable, in extension compelling the accountability-function of our Virginia Government and the administration of governance, our focus isn't to get caught up in the mindless mire of chasing hypocrisies and corruption, because Republicans/Conservatives/Maga haven't cornered the market nor monopolized that human disposition to be "full of it", (which as an aside is the reason why the narrative exposing the all too real crimes of The Trump administration and his merryband, is in this up hill battle of " why can't the people see the obvious".Because, how can a Democrat or Progressive indicit MAGA, when for example that wink and nod of "law and order", is also exploited as, Class Interest ?) But what our work firmly stands on is no one is irreproachable and its above-the-lawism impunity. In other words we are not concerned with idealistic recognitions of humanness, which at this juncture I make my point with this soliloquy as homily from the movie CONCLAVE,as delivered by the character CARDINAL LAWRENCE and I quote, "CERTAINTY, CERTAINTY IS THE GREAT ENEMY OF UNITY. CERTAINTY IS THE DEADLY ENEMY OF TOLERANCE.EVEN CHRIST WAS NOT CERTAIN AT THE END, "MY GOD, MY GOD WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME? "HE CRIED OUT IN HIS AGONY AT THE 9th HOUR ON THE CROSS.OUR FAITH IS A LIVING THING PRECISELY BECAUSE IT WALKS HAND IN HAND WITH DOUBT, IF THERE WAS ONLY CERTAINTY AND NO DOUBT, THERE WOULD BE NO MYSTERY AND THEREFORE NO NEED FOR FAITH" [from THE MOVIE CONCLAVE].So what is the Virginia Republican position? It is "certainty" that the Virginia prison official is irreproachable and above the law and this stance is extended to all law enforcement in general, despite the fact the Virginia Republican isn't that delusional to deny that accountability is an inexorable fact. Still, due to the intoxication of self-interest and its nihilism along with the complicity of The People regardless of reason we lurch from one antagonism to the next, at the expense of our Constituted Social Contractual aspirations. As such what our work requires are unimpeachable facts, on which our narrative of prison reform in Virginia is realized. Our unimpeachable facts are not intended to accomplish nothing less than present to the People of The Commonwealth, that the narrative of accountability of the Virginia prison official isn't simply limited to Prisoner abuse, but is symptomatic of their anti-subordination attitude to the will of the People of the Commonwealth.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

IN 2024 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, OVER TURNED A 1984 CASE, CHEVRON U.S.A INC. v. NRDC 467 U.S 837 THAT JUDGES HAD BEEN USING TO ALLOW PRISON OFFICIAL B.S, SO LETS TALK ABOUT IT'S REPLACEMENT By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

In 2024 The Supreme Court of The United States ruled in a case LOPER BRIGHT ENTERS. v. RAIMONDO 603 U.S 369 and I quote "Chevron, U.S.A INC. v. NRDC INC.467 U.S.837 is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority as the APA requires. Chevron deference precludes Courts from exercising the Judicial Power vested in them by Article III to say what the law is. The only way to ensure that the law will not merely change erratically, but will develop in a principled and intelligible fashion, is to leave Chevron behind." [okay that was in summation the sophistry of those 6 Justices, namely, ROBERTS, THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH and BARRETT who agreed to overturn Chevron and the 3 dissenters were KAGAN, SOTOMAYOR and JACKSON. There is something funny about a lot of this stuff and its more pronounced and in a lot of ways childishly striking with how it comes across that they've forgotten that its supposed to be about the People, that they're dealing with people, yeah the human being, the socio-person and personhood, yes socio-personhood] Before I continue I need to stipulate that, I'm not flag waving or burning it over none of the jurisprudence coming out of the current Supreme Court of The United States, but their work actually does serve a real and consequential purpose, which is it enables the amplification of that necessary speech of that, 3.5% of the population, who are clear eyed and clamoring, that the Emperor has no clothes. Here is a reminder of what The Chevron case which came to be characterized as the Chevron Deference, or for the Prisoner and as it concerns this work the Virginia Prisoner. So in 1984, The Supreme Court of The United States ruled, "That if a statute was silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for a Court was whether the Agency's action was based on a permissible construction of the statute. Further considerable weight was to be accorded to an Agency's construction of a statutory scheme." [again the sophistry of this also cuts both ways, for one "agencies" mean and are function of the Executive or The President or as specific to Virginia The Governor, the executive is tasked with executing and defending the law, with the implication, of as is fit. Now what I want to point out is this simple fact.

The only absolute is ACCOUNTABILITY, regardless and irrespective of context, which is to simply say, if you are unable to swim, regardless of reason, it's accountability, is drowning. However at any point in the accountability process of drowning, there can be intercession, again irrespective of means. So for example a Dolphin can intercede and save the drowning person. The point of all of this, the Supreme Court's rulings in both Chevron and Loper are inexorable formulations of that Social Contract, organic accountability-function that is that regardless of sophistry masterless relationship, irrespective of whether there is that stabilizing honesty of maintaining the integrity of the principle or that logical pursuit of, how do we do our human condition efficiently, meaning that accountable adherence to the business of the human condition, or we stay stuck in the delusional indulgence of the sophist permissibility of idealistic-dictatorship and its fiat bureaucracy of impunity, which is whether its Chevron and its colloquial deference or Loper and its tautology of "The only way to ensure that the law will not merely change erratically, but will develop in a principled and intelligible fashion....", the fact is neither jurisprudence is speaking to the existence of the accountability-function. During the reign and supremacy of Chevron and its kowtowing to agency interpretations and the relative applications, Judges had no problem with accepting the impunity of the prison official and as it relates to this work, the Virginia Prison Official, under the logic that the prison official shouldn't be second guessed because the job of administering the prison environment was an improbable undertaking, so Law, its application and supposedly all-seeing eye had to avert its gaze from the debased professional behavior of the prison official, nevertheless the fact that the pursuit of justice and its repair of harm, is again supposedly blind, meaning a purported "equality under law". The issue however is the human condition and its Social Contract expression anticipates the emergence and presence of, "contradictions", which arguments evidenced as the Chevron Deference are, but what is human condition bane are antagonisms, which denials and reluctances to recognize and acknowledge, that cause and effects are systemic ,is. So now that we are in this LOPER BRIGHT world, how do we understand it's activity for our purpose, our work of holding the Virginia prison official accountable. First of all since the Supreme Court gave us LOPER BRIGHT, only two States have confronted it in State criminal justice circumstances. Namely, Minnesota in KAMBON v. STATE 23 N.W 3d 576 (2025) [ and in this Minnesota encounter the existence of Loper Bright caused Minnesota to make a farce of its very own jurisprudence, which proves and underscores the tautology of Loper Bright]. Then, Florida tangled with Loper Bright in a State Habeas construction, BATES v. STATE 416 So.3d 312 (2025) [again another comical encounter with Loper Bright].But then in this Connecticut State case we see a defiance to the dismissal of Chevron, so in WILLIAMS v. ARI of CONN.INC. 2024 CONN SUPER LEXIS 1786, we see a Connecticut court declaring that the annihilation and dismissal of Chevron and its colloquial deference doesn't mean it "no longer applys in State Court". Both CHEVRON and LOPER BRIGHT deal with the the actual practice of Government and governance, through the agents or "Agencies" of its administration. The Virginia Department of Corrections as Agency, an agent of The Government of The Commonwealth of Virginia, under VIRGINIA'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ACT. Code 2.2-4000 is directed and tasked with imprisoning people, while denying Prisoners its process.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

A UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS-AMHERST PROFESSOR NAMED JAMIE (something) SAID GOVERNOR ABIGAIL SPANBERGER IN CONTRAST WITH TRUMP'S FLUNKIES IS SERIOUS, BECAUSE SHE CRITIQUED CORRUPTION IN HER RESPONSE TO TRUMP'S 2026 STATE OF THE UNION (whatever) By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Well Professor Jamie (something) of University of Massachusetts-Amherst, you clearly are a Johnny come lately, to Virginia speech. Professor Jamie (something) of Univ. of Massachusetts-Amherst, you're a regular on Arnie Arnesen, presenting a quasi and pseudo-Progressive perspective. You said one of your students gave you the thumbs up endorsement of Governor Abigail Spanberger's 14 minute response to Trump's 2026 State of The Union (whatever) and it dawned on you that, the student was animated by, "trust", that she trusted Gov. Spanberger. I BEGIN: This current cresting of a National and State across the board practice of impunity and the concurrent reality of selective prosecutions and persecutions embodied as Trump and his merryband of the various forms, levels and types of reactionaries, isn't novel nor unique, not to our history, not to the human condition and as a matter of fact it is perversive to suggest that this cresting impunity is exceptional, because it then denies, distorts and impedes, the necessary motive force of analysis. Progressivism as it stands in opposition to the reaction of Conservatism and its natural state of impunity is primarily, critique and analysis. This isn't a reality that needs and requires explanation. What this work however is concerned with is, confronting and giving clarity to the developing narrative that Gov. Spanberger, as she should, correctly and actually, understands that, the fundamental motive force of her historical presence and political emergence is to breath air to the primary critique that corruption is euphemism for impunity. Despite this obvious fact, Governor Abigail Spanberger, her aides and Virginia Democrats as their brethren across the Nation are showing, firstly an inability and secondly the unwillingness, regardless of reason to provide and present the People with that, notwithstanding its conventional tardiness, the inevitable critique and analysis of the work of perfecting the unity of the people, meaning that general and specific application of "equality under law", which its nemesis exposed the neurosis of their, thought and position by the indulgence of a Civil War in opposition and the perfidious incorrigibility of their logic, expressed in the shameless and pathetic pursuit of the revisionist " Lost Cause", then that betrayal of, perfecting the unity of the people, with the embrace of impunity by the Compromise of 1871.The Rule of Law and its Due Process underpins and determines the dexterity of a political-economy, meaning the value exchange, its circumstances and conditions as business of the human being, organized as terms of The Social Contract then demands that unity of law and its process of repairing that naturally accompanying harm as dialectic of the business of being human.

The objective of Leadership regardless of context, which as it concerns this work, is its expression and state as embodied by Governor Abigail Spanberger, is that clear articulation of the unity of law and its process of repairing harm, which is the honesty of that aspired to and condition of social stability, theorized as, the unity of the people, as equality under law, which in its quintessential being, is unequivocal, unambiguous and unconditional accountability which in its natural state and dynamic is implacable, or the transparency of cause and effect. So when Gov. Spanberger grounded her response to Trump on the corruption critique, which she also exploited in achieving her historic electoral triumph, it was a postural delve, baby steps in presenting a side or facet of its polygonal presence as that natural congruent of the value exchange of the human condition. Is Gov. Spanberger aware of this congruent component nature of corruption of course she does, she is human and even if in the primitive generality of her humanness, she lacked its communicative language, her cog function in the Social Contract, instructed and provided her with its language. So yes Gov. Spanberger understands perfectly well and clearly that the tugging at that loose thread end of the sleeve, as corruption critique is and should also have the analytic transparency of its systemic cause and effect, sleeve completely historically falling off anticipation, which is the "unity of the people" intolerance towards impunity, as a war of no quarters. If quintessentially The State or Government is the organized violence of coercion and if The State is the aggregated speech and will of the people as collective, which for purpose of this work, The Commonwealth of Virginia, then the first object and its fundamental subject and facet, impunity, must be wrangled onto and upon are all expressions, exhibitions and practices of, its means and mechanism, Law. So one of the first acts Gov. Spanberger did was designate by selecting a Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections. Which the function of imprisonment in the name of the People, epitomizes, coercion and organized violence. This act, accordingly would then be instructive and revelatory of her relative intention of engaging, impunity and its corrosive and corrupting activity on all things Virginia's Social Contract. Well I hate to be the bearer of, yup you guessed it, that sort of news to our University of Massachusetts-Amherst Professor Jamie (something), that Gov. Spanberger chose to play footsie with impunity, by retreating to the complicitous and accomplice status quo function that exist in opposition to that "perfection of the unity of the people", with the selection of one Joseph Walters, an apparatchik of the Department whose hands are fossilized and crusty with the historicity and epigenetics of impunity and its siamese corruption self as the dehumanization of the imprisoned Virginian as professional behavior of the Virginia prison official. Now does this failing indicate anything besides status quo impulses?, no it doesn't, but what it does require is analytic maturity from our sister Professor Jamie (something) of U Mass-Amherst, that impunity and its euphemism, corruption, isn't a topical or localized fact and it isn't an emergence that is secondary but it has a dialectic that is primary, historic and original. So yes salute Governor Abigail Spanberger as a breath of fresh air and now we need the effusion.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

THE POSITION AND STANCE OF VICTIMS RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS AND ADVOCACY IS UNDERSTANDABLE, BUT THAT DOESN'T MAKE THEM UNTOUCHABLE NOR CRITIQUE AND ANALYSIS PROOF By William Thorpe

I was studying the state of prison and criminal justice reform across the land and the work of Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois, along with the Illinois Democratic Party, Reform Advocates and the enlightened People of Illinois stood out. Yes Virginia Democrats under the leadership of Governor Ralph Northam, Reform Advocates and the enlightened People of Virginia also acquitted themselves, with the herculean work of abolishing the death penalty, reform on the margins of imprisonment, the apportionment of imprisoned Virginians as electoral constituencies back to the jurisdictions of initial arrest and other reforms. Now the reason JB Pritzker and the Illinois efforts are noteworthy, is primarily because of the opposition from Illinois Republicans and their Victims Rights Organizations allies, created roadblocks and the subsequent idealistic laws enacted as a result. Yes Virginia Republicans are equally as reactionary as their Illinois brethren and are also allied with victims rights advocacy in opposing any "perfection of the unity of the people" as expressed as holding the Virginia prison official accountable and reform of an imprisonment circumstance and condition, that quite frankly under any vantage of scrutiny has nothing to do with euphemistic "justice" as repair of the all too real harm to victims, which weren't Victims Rights Advocacy so enthralled and enslaved to the distortion and its misrepresentation of crass revenge and petty vindictiveness as "justice", would easily see it as such and recognize why our ancients instructed that the rule of law and its repair of harm shouldn't become a descent into the idealistic morass of revenge and vindictiveness as a "justice" surrogacy. I BEGIN: The issue or question isn't whether crimes are not committed by the legitimately adjudicated, convicted, imprisoned and sanctioned Virginian, whether harm isn't meted to fellow human and social personhood, it is and accordingly anticipated by terms of the Social Contract. But that's where the current speech of Victims Rights advocacy, irrespective of presence of mind, transforms into the exploitation of harm for a specific political-economy and its agenda that perpetrates a more cataclysmic and general criminality on the socio-personhood as function of the Social Contract, which then trickles down as consequence into that tragic and heinous singular existence or topical criminality, that is then viscerally scapegoated by the status quo embodiments of the Social Contract as a perpetual self-serving font narrative for their sustenance and maintenance and its dynamic continuum of the next inevitable crime. This work isn't conclusive nor presumptuously intended to be. What this work intends is to state that, the work of Victims Rights advocacy has to recognize that, there are other portals of critique for victims rights, besides the entrapment of vindictiveness. A point of observation, isn't our circumstance as the Human Condition a result of our prescience and ability to prepare?, Which in the context of crime, simply implies that our Leaders must present analysis of why certain conditions breed it, which victims rights advocacy must then speak to its amelioration.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982