CANCER CAUSING WATER AT VIRGINIA'S SUSSEX I STATE PRISON, ISNT NEW BUT IT ONCE AGAIN FRAMES THE ISSUE THAT THE FIGHT OVER VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME ISN'T JUST ABOUT CONDITIONS By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Sussex I State Prison or better yet, Virginia's Koncentration Kamp at Sussex I, is built like a bunker to withstand a nuclear blast, but it is sinking, yes the earth beneath it is saying enough of this. From the cracks in its super structure, hinting at that "all the Kings men couldn't put it back together", to the trapped ghost of dead enslaved people, yes Sussex is haunted and what I'm saying isn't hearsay. I speak from first hand experience. Koncentration Kamp Sussex I, is its own beast of Koncentration Kamp.[see my September 10, 2018 work on Sussex I, titled: A STORY OF PROFESSIONAL IRRESPONSIBILITY and ETHICAL INDIFFERENCE BY A VIRGINIA SUSSEX I STATE PRISON [SXISP] MENTAL HEALTH OFFICIAL. Then September 9, 2018 titled: VIRGINIA'S SUSSEX I STATE PRISON and THE SERIAL VIOLATOR PRISON GUARD N.IWUAMADI and to really get the point across as to what nature of beast is Koncentration Kamp Sussex I, you can also check out this October 8, 2018 work titled: IN VIRGINIA I LOVE YOU CARDS UNAUTHORIZED TO SOLITARY CONFINEMENT PRISONERS AT VADOC SUSSEX I STATE PRISON (attn. I had the experience with the cards in 2018 when I was held at Sussex for a couple of months from Red Onion)].The chronicles of dehumanization of the imprisoned Virginian at Koncentration Kamp Sussex I, is legion. All one has to do is access the catalog of court cases filed by Sussex I prisoners against the Virginia Prison Official and while you are at it remove the name Sussex I and replace it with Red Onion, or Wallens Ridge, or Pocahontas or River North or Greensville, even Keen Mountain and you'll quickly realize its that same ole, Don McLean's "good ole boys drinking whiskey and rye",song. So the question before us isn't the mere recognition that its the same ole song, be it cancer causing water or the killing of Aubrey McKay by Wallens Ridge Prison Officials or the number of Virginia Prisoners shipped out to other State prison systems or that fundamental unwillingness by the Virginia Prison official to come to terms with the simple fact that conviction of an alleged crime and the subsequent Imprisonment isn't leave for dehumanization, but how mature is our ability to engage the People of Virginia on the terms that Prison and the Justice Infrastructure only exist because of LAW, which is the glue of Virginia Society and the Social Contract, as such it cannot exist selectively. So for example if the Commonwealth of Virginia recognizes, for instance certain causes of death, like hypertension to its Public Servants as job related and surviving family of the deceased worker are accorded the relative job related benefits. Then a Virginian, for example Henry Gorham Jr. (Bobilly) who died last year in Prison at Greensville, was imprisoned healthy and young. He wasn't sentenced to die in prison then due to the nature and circumstance of the imprisonment, he becomes ill and dies. The death is characterized as due to "natural causes" (and here is another rub I'm of the position that no Black Person's death whether in the diaspora or Africa since the 1400's can ever be accepted as of "natural causes", because if ones human condition is subjected to an external non transactional dynamic, then there is nothing self-deterministic or "natural" about whatever semblance of occurring agency is expressed as reaction and response. In other words if we don't recognize harm to fellow human as natural as the impact of an earthquake or hurricane, then the violent imposition on Africa since the 1400's isn't natural).But his death isn't seen as due to imprisonment,

There isn't any novel philosophy in what I'm saying. All I'm stating is the obvious and whether we are honest and willing to confront it, as stance against that inevitability of "when they came for the characterized undesirable, I said nothing, then I was next" is a formulation that is primordial as the synaptic habits determining Homosapiens. What I want to focus on is the real work of holding Virginia's imprisonment scheme accountable, which cancer causing water for imprisoned human beings at Koncentration Kamp Sussex I, is but existence of the fraud perpetrated by those who presume to dictate and determine, the definition of the Virginia organic socio-person. The question isn't about the speech of Virginia's justice infrastructure as in adjudication of socio-person deviance, but its instead the contention that, if we truly presume society structured on a Social Contract, then, the leeway isn't a simple prerogative of the dictatorship of intent and its organized violence mechanism. The fact of Virginia's adjudicative impositions, notwithstanding its assumptions does not contradict that after its all said and done, the only remnant are suppositions as such the relative Constituted aspirations of the Commonwealth cannot exist as crass canards, just because certain minds are haplessly mired in a political-economic construct that belies the fact that, thats all it is, a construct, that palpitates with the expectation of progress, which for you reactionaries, means development and its inexorable work of unifying the People and again for you reactionaries, the perfection of that unity of the people is essentially, the "just and right side of history" resolutions of contradictions and the unflinching identification and illumination of antagonisms garbed in their systemic antithesis. So we begin with, if Virginia legislators are at peace with the logic and, yes it is a honest one that, the human business of existence or its conventional description as, "job related" warrants recognition on its terms and all of this are structured on the existence of the human being or its purported unconditional affirmation. Because everything is about the context of human life, yet that same Virginia legislature can determine that the life of the imprisoned Virginian is less, unequal and subordinate to whatever contextual transitory ignorances are reptilian like emerged basking in the Sun. While ridiculously mocking the affirmative insight of the "job related" declarative by failing to recognize that by repudiating its logic in the imprisonment schematic, the entire human business of existence is undermined. This brings to mind the speech of the 1993 Rwanda Genocide, where its participants and perpetrators, would get themselves together in the morning kiss and tell their wives, that they were going to "work", a mundane 9-5 of slaughtering human beings and return home, have dinner etc. as any regular humdrum family home tableau, after work. The Hutu perpetrators of the "work" psychology of the Rwanda Genocide are, not unique. It is the basic and fundamental nature of our human condition in the absence of that unconditional affirmation of Human life. The antagonism of this reconciliation isn't with the existence of heinous crimes, nor is there dispute with its accounting. Yes, criminality and deviance can be held accountable without dehumanization, without mocking the sacrosanctity of human life with denigration. While there are those among the people working to affirm the equality under law, declarative, meaning sanction isn't dehumanization. There are also those equally at work in its undermine, pursuing the deception that the victim of crime should find solace in the fact the convicted is being given cancer causing water.

By William Thorpe

 I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

SOCIETY IS CONSTRUCTED ON IDEAS AND HERE ARE A CONTINUATION OF SOME OF THEM PRESENTED BY PEOPLE YOU HAVEN'T EVER HEARD OF WHO DETERMINE THE CONDITIONS OF THE IMPRISONED By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

In part I, I listed titles of works by cogs and elements in the Legal and Justice Infrastructure that are determining the circumstances, conditions and logic of what the imprisoned experiences in all US Prisons. But more specifically, considering that my focus is on the Commonwealth of Virginia's Imprisonment scheme the listing is for the Virginia Prisoner along with Family, Friends and Ally, because yes, the Virginia voter elects their representatives and Political leaders and supposes that those elected will exercise their organic judiciousness and judgement. However the reality is there exist unbeknownst to the average voter an entire Idea Industry influencing the elected. The incomparable Ava Duvernay captured this machinery in her Film, THE 13th,when she became aware of ALEC or AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL or more contemporaneously, PROJECT 2025 by THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION and its sister THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY. I cite these examples as nudge that the work of reforming Virginia's imprisonment scheme requires a substantial intimate grasp of ideas of Criminal Justice postulated by minds and hearts most have never heard of that play oversized roles even more than the electoral process and their shadowy existence is all part of that bureaucratic existence of State Secrets. Here is Part ll of the list, please share with your imprisoned loved one.

SOLITARY CONFINEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: WHY THE U.S PRISON SYSTEM FAILS GLOBAL STANDARDS---21 Am.U.Intl.L.Rev.71 by ELIZABETH VASILIADES THE PRIVATE PRISON'S INDUSTRY'S UNWARRANTED SEC.1983 BENEFITS---76 Ala. L.Rev.1 by AMANDA J. PETERS HEPATITIS C. LITIGATION: HEALING INMATES AS A PUBLIC HEALTH STRATEGY---29 Ann. Health L.127 by ROBERT KATZ POLICE SECRECY EXCEPTIONALISM---123 Colum. L. Rev 615 by CHRISTINA KONINGISOR THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT: A SEPARATION OF POWERS DILEMMA---50 Ala .L. Rev.585 by THOMAS JULIAN BUTLER CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECRETS---59 Am. Crim.L.Rev. 1541 by MEGHAN J. RYAN A CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN HABEAS CORPUS---60 Hastings L.J.541 by EMILY GARCIA UHRIG [cited in ALLEN v. STATE 914 N.W.2d 866, EX PARTE SANDOVAL 508 S.W. 3d 284, GRIFFITH v. STATE 507 S.W.3d 720] LAW, FACT,AND APPELLATE REVIEW---110 Iowa L.Rev.1 by ADAM N. STEINMAN THE EMBODIMENT OF SOVEREIGNTY: OUTRAGES, SECTION 1983 LITIGATION, AND THE FEDERALISM REVIVAL---98 S.Cal.L.Rev.367 by NORMAN W. SPAULDING THE CASE FOR (MOSTLY) ELIMINATING RULE (12b) (6) CHALLENGE TO PRO SE COMPLAINTS---17 Ne.U.L.Rev.351 by RICHARD LUEDEMAN HOT CRIMES: A STUDY IN EXCESS---45 Creighton L.Rev.33 by STEVEN GROSSMAN [cited in SIMPSON v. STATE 447 S.W.3d 264 (Texas case)] THE SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE OF PUNISHMENT---109 Colum. L. Rev.182 by ADAM J. KOLBER EVALUATING THE CONSEQUENCES OF CALIBRATED SENTENCING: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOLBER---109 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 11 by MIRIAM H. BAER TOWARDS A THEORY OF MITIGATION---96 B.U.L. Rev. 161 by CLARISSA BYRNE HESSICK and DOUGLAS A. BERMAN [cited in STATE v. WITHROW 64 N.E.3d 553 (Ohio case)] "RUINED"---111 Geo.L.J.237 by MAYBELL ROMERO 

The above listed are a bit of works produced by legal Scholars and writers, I suggest they're studied because they influence Government.

By William Thorpe

 I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

THE SYMBIOTIC COMPLICITY OF SOME OF THE PEOPLE, THE VIRGINIA CONSULTANCY CLASS AND IT'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY ESTABLISHMENT MEMBERS, THE VIRGINIA REPUBLICAN PARTY IS SELLING US SHORT ON THE EQUALITY UNDER LAW OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE AND THE SCAPE GOATING OF THE IMPRISONED VIRGINIAN By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Abigail Spanberger became the first Woman Governor of The Commonwealth of Virginia, in 2026 upon the articulations of a number of factors, of which, "affordability", despite its primacy was one, but as aspect of something more fundamental, which considering the constant hither-whither lurching of Virginia and our National Political Speech, is treated as an ineffable force, despite the fact, its exegesis is the determinant around which the behavior or character of everything else orients and this ineffable force is, ACCOUNTABILITY or that erstwhile anticipation of the governance of a Government, the ACCOUNTABILITY-FUNCTION. I say erstwhile because governance, abrogating its phenomenon legitimacy currently exist as noumenon. Because if the business of human existence is phenomena as constituted speech of the Human Condition, then this unwillingness to speak its accountability-function that we owe primary allegiance to as such replacing it with the indulgence of it's worship as an ineffable noumenon doesn't then transform into some sort of wink-wink, fingers crossed behind our backs absolution, or a surrogate argument of whether there is, or because of an absence of language to define necessitating its noumenal worship. An absence of language for which we have our very selves to blame for making the systemic analysis and critique, which is the language of its excavation verboten, a denial of the existence of that grand arbiter or the ACCOUNTABILITY-FUNCTION phenomenon and its infinite permutations and expressions as the very ground or foundation [or the "faith and trust] glue of the Social Contract irrespective of and notwithstanding its perversions, distortions and misanthropic misuse, which are all conditions that inevitably and inexorably await resolution and settlement. All of this leads us to the crux or fulcrum of the human condition or as focus of this work, Virginia's Social Contract, which its highest function, as I've illustrated is the ACCOUNTABILITY-FUNCTION revealed as the organized-violence of its justice infrastructure. Despite the foundational nature, the justice infrastructure and its organized-violence has as primary component of the constituted speech of The Commonwealth of Virginia, which is also where we meet and encounter it's antithesis or that natural corruption as accompanying dynamic, which demands and requires the perceptive vigilance of All of The People and the subsequent reform, or that proverbial "cat and mice", or to quote the prescient Bob Marley, "when the cats away the mice will play". This brings me to this, Governor Abigail Spanberger recently vetoed a provisional law on the importation of out of State prisoners, to the Koncentration Kamp Red Onion State Prison. The reality is it was a meaningless and toothless law, still she vetoed it. Again Virginia's General Assembly recently unanimously approved a bill, HB 1030, which Governor Spanberger signed into law and is codified at Virginia Code 53.1-151-1.The law presents itself as criminal justice reform-Pro Parole, but needless I add anything that can claim legislative unanimity in 2026,is anything but reform. 

Virginia's Social Contract upon its Constituted Speech of Law and Process, regardless of form, from the summary imposition of Monarchical fiat, through the Colonial Corporation formation to the Democratic Assemblies of republicanism, has upon inception contradicted its aspirational intent as revelatory character of its Primitive logic. What we currently experience as the antagonism of Virginia's conditional, equality under law, isn't necessarily an indictment of Law as principle, but, the Primitive nature of a Social Contracts' speech that hasn't been compelled to mature and practically develop its aspirations and to that we firstly hold accountable those elements who presume proximate definition of the contours, parameters and utility of organic existence in Virginia and secondarily, the Virginia People who as expressed behaviorally are somnambulistic, to the compromising machinations. Again, if the crux of Virginia Society and Value is the nature of its Justice Infrastructure and the concurring imprisonment scheme and this stands revealed, for starters in the fact that the Commonwealth's Primary agency or arm of its governance is The Department of Corrections and not for instance, its Educational or Healthcare systems. The meaning is clear it values the organized-violence of imprisonment above all else and of course there is the usual suppositionary sophistry in its defense. My focus with this work is on the other aspect of Virginia's governance that enables the sophistry where it is considered sane and a productive realization of the human business of existence to foist on and restrict the inevitability of the development of the aspirations as constituted speech of the Commonwealth with this incessant acquiescent servile homage to the reactionist attitude towards critique of the systemic factors of Virginia's criminal justice. Despite the fact that Virginia contains a plurality of tendencies on any number of social contract issues and terms, on the primary issue of accountability of the Virginia prison official's professional behavior within the imprisonment scheme what we encounter are not just a paralysis of will to counter the farcical dictatorship of reaction, but a complete neutering of the progressive imperative and enlightenment. Even as the correctness and Just critique of the origins of Virginia's imprisonment schemes has moderated focus on the chattel enslavement basis and participated in the delusion that Virginia's justice infrastructure and the imprisonment scheme has an iota of regard and is actually concerned with whatever it means to repair "a" harm of crime. Reaction and those who benefit and have immediate exploitive interest in Virginia's imprisonment narrative, have taken and assumed that such moderation implies a surrender of narrative and conventional experience bears it out. Because for example the Virginia Democratic Party establishment and its Consultancy class have ever since abandonment by reactionary White Virginians, who as a general principle opposed desegregation and understood the Virginia Republican Party's Law and Order vocabulary as euphemism for a labor to minimize and dilute whatever substance desegregation aspired in the Commonwealth, turned themselves into pretzels in courting those pro segregation White Virginians to return to the Democratic Party. So what this has meant and accomplished is a continuum of compromises, at the expense and a betrayal of the aspirations and Constituted Speech of the Commonwealth in all respects, with the only reality, hapless malfeasance, extra-judicial facts, above-the-lawism, gratuitous violence and that existential destruction of the "faith and trust" of the People's will in the Social Contract and governance.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

INSTEAD OF VIRGINIA'S IDEALISTIC PAROLE PROCESS WHAT IS NEEDED IS A STATUTORY AND MANDATORY RESENTENCING COURT SYSTEM By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

In a recent work for VIRGINIA PRISONERS DAY, titled, HERE ARE MY TWO CENTS FOR THE 2026 MARKING OF VIRGINIA PRISONERS DAY (which was yesterday, the Third Sunday in May) I sketched the substitution of Virginia's current Parole process with the replacement of a mandatory resentencing regime, under the function of a statutory Court system. The applicable details are already functioning aspects of Virginia's Justice Infrastructure albeit existing ununified for this anticipated purpose of replacement for a Parole process that its historical critique has and currently serves no other function than political opportunity, a "reform" three card Monte, permitting reactionaries to coopt and claim Progressive enlightenment, when they are everything but, evidenced, with this latest spectacle of HB 1030 codified as Virginia law at 53.1-151.1. My purpose with the initial sketch of a statutory and mandatory resentencing court system as replacement and substitute for Virginia's parole process was to spur "thought". There is nothing practical about the Human Condition and the many forms of its Social Contract in its capture and development of the "unity of the people", or that maturity of the socio-person, which is wholly determinative and dependent on the accountability-function of governance, that allows the assertion, the business of human existence has attained that condition and circumstance where reform is idealistic and unwelcome. Still though we have the perversion and distortion of the reactionary and reaction's claims that nothing about the business of human existence demands the scrutiny and interrogation of reform and this claim which is the bureaucracy of the organized-violence of a Justice Infrastructure as the only refuge of the impunity of the Prison Official and for purposes of this work, the Virginia prison official and Virginia's imprisonment scheme which the "intention" of Parole as currently formulated is aspect, defends. The reality is it must be reformed according to its intent, which needless I add is release of the imprisoned.

This idea of statutory mandatory resentencing, as replacement for the current Parole process is simple, it works to bring honesty to the Commonwealth of Virginia's constituted speech of "equality under law", in contrast with this current attitude the Commonwealth has as a hodgepodge sort of idealistic relations with its imprisoned members of Society, when the reality, according to the intrinsic activity of it's Constituted Speech, Law as it's creator as basis and fundamental lattice of it's Social Contract, its imprisoned members are the most lawful, because the imprisoned Virginian is solely and specifically a creation of Virginia law or to put it bluntly whatever are it's distilled and crystalized value realizations are manifested in it's behavior with, as applied in the circumstance of its imprisonment scheme. Of course what I'm illustrating contradicts, what in actuality is the conventional hypocrisy of the Social Contract, because under its distortions as "conventional wisdom", not only isn't the imprisoned the only lawful entity in society, but the imprisoned isn't even human according to a jurisprudence of the same law that in order to impose dehumanization must firstly accord extraordinary recognitions of humanness. Anyway not to belabor the imbued hypocrisy and auto-negation of such "conventional wisdom", that under its hypocrisies births, despite the good and best intentions of its original proponents, the Parole process, which we contend with as, the dictatorship of intent. Our focus and work is to change it. The imprisoned Virginian as seen by the Social Contract is lawfully imprisoned. We are not disputing or debating its construct, our contention is simple, then don't colloquialize it, don't introduce formulations that are borne not of natural algebraic anticipations, of the constituted speech of law, based on the one thing leads to the other, clarity revealed by the dynamics, albeit primitive formations of the political-economy but preset and preconceived notions or that which are crass facts of the dictatorship of intent. If the Virginia prisoner is convicted according to the due process of law in all its substance along with the necessary penalties, when the process is usurped by the crass anticipations of the dictatorship of intent and an entire industry of the political-economy of its appellate process exist, attesting to this, then why do we accept the speculations and idealistic speech of a parole process that is incapable of defending itself were it opened to the level of scrutiny the significance of its work demands?. Again our response is simple we change it. We suggest a due process of law, applied upon a statutorily created Virginia Court system and adjudication that is based on a set of metrics, including, but not limited to age groupings: (a) 16---25, (b) 26--50 and (c) 51 on up, which the People of the Commonwealth will determine as terms for a resentencing of the imprisoned, that will result, immediate release, a resentencing (that will subsequently toll another resentencing date) or the continuation of the original sentence. This Resentencing Process will be strictly determined by a sitting Jury (determinations will not necessarily be unanimous, but of a majority).The Prisoner will have representation just as the adjudicative process of the original conviction or can self-represent. The Prisoner will have substantial opportunity to present materials, witnesses and sets of facts in support. The Commonwealth will play its usual adversarial role.

By William Thorpe 

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

THE RECENT VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT RULING IN THE REDISTRICTING REFERENDUM CASE, SCOTT v. McDOUGLE 2026 VA LEXIS 35, AS ALL THINGS POLITICAL IMPACTS ALL ASPECTS OF VIRGINIA'S SOCIAL CONTRACT INCLUDING PRISON REFORM By William Thorpe

 

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

So lets get into it. Virginia currently has a Prison Population of 49,000 and every last one ineligible to vote. Before the 2020's Democratic Administration of Ralph Northam along with a Virginia General Assembly Democratic Majority changed the then existing Law, all Virginia Prisoners were counted as members of the Political Jurisdictions the Prisons that held them were located at which in most cases were predominantly rural and largely ethnically White at the expense and political loss of the largely urban Cities of their removal, which in most cases were diverse with a ethnically Black and politically viable population, while denying and depriving them of whatever benefits, privileges and protections those political districts accorded its residents. In other words rural counties with prisons enjoyed the benefits the prisoner population brought them, just as the Constitution of the United States came into existence on the corrupting complicit compromises that electorally reduced the enslaved Human to a 3/5ths person. Virginia Democrats under Ralph Northam rousing a beastly ire of Virginia Republicans who had historically benefited from the transfer of urban prisoners to rural Virginia prisons, changed the law to allow for the imprisoned Virginian to be counted for all electoral and political purposes as members of the urban locales that had lost them, which in turn became a relative disincentive metric for Republican apparatchik insider influence on the Virginia Department of Corrections to continue assisting and enabling Virginia Republican politics by providing their districts with the proverbial 3/5ths electoral person. The point is as long as the dynamic of, and I quote from the words of D. Arthur Kelsey writer of the majority Opinion in the Scott v McDougle ruling and he quotes from 3 JOSEPH STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES sec.1609 (1833) "A Constitution by its very nature "declare[s] under what circumstances, and in what manner it shall be amended," and it is "The supreme Law of the land, TO WHICH ALL PERSONS, RULERS, AS WELL AS CITIZENS MUST BOW IN OBEDIENCE "[my emphasis], Feudalism under its neon formulations, exist. Now I want to draw the readers attention to what I emphasized.(1) A jurist D. Arthur Kelsey on the Virginia Supreme Court in 2026 didn't have any issue with the characterization of America's Social Contract terms, of "rulers"?, and found affinity with it to quote it as authority and insight, which even in 1833 when those words were breathed into existence, were treacherous, discordant, dichotomous, cognitively dissonant, insidious and diametrically at odds with what the most basic element picking up arms in 1770's colonial America against "Ruler "understood that for there to be a ruler, as Mr. Kelsey evokes, there has to be not the deceptive, sleight of hand, "citizen", (Mr. Story attempts to divert attention from his real labor which has already been revealed, with the descriptive "ruler"), but "subject" and its ridiculous to think that, the Antonin Scalia's, Clarence Thomases, Samuel Alito's, John Roberts, Donald Trump's, the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Societies of that day, along with Friedrich Hayek pining for monarchial and the dictatorship of the aristocracy were delusional despite being puffed up with its "grandeur" to think that all those Minute Men were dying a la Crispus Attucks to suffer.

What Jurist Kelsey, reveals writing for the majority in the SCOTT v. McDOUGLE 2026 Va. LEXIS 35 redistricting case, disqualifying the People's Speech, (which by the way and its quite telling, the Chief Justice of Virginia's Supreme Court, POWELL, not only dissented but, he felt so strongly about it that he wrote the Dissent) is what we have all along understood, which is when the formulations of Social Contracts of our Human Condition are still in primitive formations, which the Commonwealth of Virginias' and our Nations' are facts. The intrinsic animator is the corruption of its character, which is that dynamic or consequence of the Dictatorship of Intent. What I mean by, dictatorship of intent, is simple and in it lies as the corrupt character, because it is the crass imposition of "the idea", minus or at the expense of its basic nature. So, the basic nature of our Human Condition is Existence, with the means or mechanism it's Re-creation, which its work is the human business of existence. So it goes to say that the quality of the human business of existence as construct of a Social Contract, is that which recognizes that the "idea", is guide or intent and not objective, which again is Existence, as such the infinite expressions of obfuscations, which is where we encounter the reactionary, are consequently a corruption requiring or in Social Contract terms, Reform and as focus of this work, Virginia's imprisonment scheme and holding the Virginia Prison Official accountable. In this context the sophistry evidenced by the Virginia Supreme Court majority ruling in the SCOTT voter speech disqualification and exposed by Chief Justice POWELL'S dissent is again fact of the primitive formation and corrupt character of Virginia's Social Contract, presenting that, the necessary development and I won't preemptively describe the absence of reformation as incident of corruption, because corruption has to firstly be perceived, then resolved with its reform. However the dictatorship of intent, has inkling that the phenomena appearing as contradictions and antagonisms are facts of the existence of corruption, because the terms of the Social Contract are relatively at odds and stand in compromise with its constituted aspirations. So we see this clearly with all that the Commonwealth declares as basis of the Justice Infrastructure and imprisonment scheme haplessly transformed into petty extra-judicial above-the-lawism by the Virginia prison official, borne on the exact logic of Kelsey and co.in their SCOTT ruling. What all of this means in the context of perfecting the UNITY OF THE PEOPLE as that qualification of the social contract focus of the human business of existence, is the presence then of what we indict as violations, presenting the mechanisms of response or resolution as the birthed relative vocabulary and language to describe and expose the inconsistencies. Which then means the onus and responsibility of reform shifts from the status quo malfeasant, violator and offender onto us the People being exploited by the accompanying systemic injustice, to counter-speak in all its organic activity on the simple foundational basis that human existence isn't, suppositionary, it isn't borne of ideas nor theology, but material facts of x=y and not opportunities to be exploited by reactionary politicians pursuing the presumptions of primitive political-economy formulations, along with the fact the status quo actor and beneficiary of the corruption will struggle and desperately battle against reform.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982