EXPLOITING CRIME AND HARM TO DIVIDE THE PEOPLE IS PURPOSEFUL AND DELIBERATE By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Every single Constituted assertion of our Social Contract, whether, Nationally or The States, aspires to the "perfection of the unity of the people" and this isn't unique to The Commonwealth of Virginia or The United States. Every aggregate of humanity on the Planet professes, unity of the people. This simply means there is an establishment and construction of a mechanism, a process where harm experienced by personhood, and disagreements within the polity of the Social Contract are methodically resolved, along with the necessary respect and dignity accorded the respective Human Life and Social Person, in otherwords, the existence and application of Law and its Due Process. But the fly in the ointment of this definition of Social Contract, is simply this, the human condition isn't a dynamic, primarily concerned with the equitable resolution of harm and disagreements. Instead what the human condition and its Social Contract organism is concerned with is the circumstances of existence and survival. As such "Harm", is unequivocally and unambiguously understood as any and all phenomenon and phenomena impeding and posing what is seen as a clear and present danger, to that circumstance of existence and survival of the aggregated social contract and this is in principle and conveyed and expressed as that practicality of, the "perfection of the unity of the people ".The focus of my work, which, this is chapter, is sternly on holding the Virginia Prison Official accountable as motive of reforming Virginia's prison system, accordingly, this analysis brings us squarely in confrontation with "Harm" as a component of the Social Contract, not as its typical encounter as type of narrative deployed in the employ of the anti-reform forces, but as it systemically exist as that fundamental nemesis of the circumstances of existence and survival of the aggregated social contract and the People, which because of its controlling and dictatorial status quo function, is denied as existing. But if we are to prevail and drag the Commonwealth and its reactionary anti-reformers into the accountability-function of the "unity of the people", then we have to expose the exploitation of "harm" by those backwards hearts and minds amongst the people who are incapable of restraining their self-destructive impulses of cutting off their noses to spite their faces, which wouldn't be of any concern to us, save for the fact its also our collective noses, with showing that when "Harm" is laid bare as primarily a bane on the collective social contract and not just that pathetic existence of isolated and unitary tragedies, we are then clear eyed about the fact that the tolerance of systemic impunity and it's mockery of the People's will by the status quo function of The Social Contract, is what is inculcating and breeding asocial responses by the Virginia Personhood. The consequence is the existence of a division among and between the people, which is encountered in all sorts of ways, from victims of the impunity of the Virginia prison official, parroting the self-serving status quo narrative, that one class of the imprisoned Virginian is worse than other types of prisoners, even if in deeds, such is correct and commissions of harm are comparatively monstrous. The highlighting and underscoring of that type of harm and crime at the expense of the more destructive and systemic harm and its criminality, serves only one function and purpose, which is that unoriginal pursuit and its weaponization of the "divide and conquer "dictatorship maxim of value appropriation of the materialization of the circumstances of human existence and survival.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

LETS REMOVE THE MYTHOLOGY OF THE ACCOUNTABILITY-FUNCTION OF THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL AND REALIZE REFORM OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

One of the first and initial acts of Governor Abigail Spanberger was to elevate by selecting a Virginia Department of Corrections, apparatchik, Joseph Walters, to become it's Director and the inevitable reaction and its condemnation was swift, prompt and vociferous. This work isn't to purport that a basis for Governor Spanbergers' action exist save for that perennial Democratic fear of "Law and Order" issues, which prison and imprisonment is its most distilled. In otherwords, Governor Spanberger and her advisors made the calculated and its cost benefit analysis, that with everything being correct that the Virginia prison official is a corrupt entity, its not in her nor Virginia's Democratic Party interest, to own the Department's rotted carcass, by embarking on the accountability-function of bringing it to heel, with the chemotherapy of finally subordinating the Virginia prison official to the will of the People of Virginia. In one word Governor Spanberger had her moment and encounter, with that historic encapsulation of, "we've met the enemy and its us", to which on that issue, shirked from, the anticipated and expected leadership force and its necessary motive of finally aligning The Commonwealth of Virginia with its asserted aspirations. What this makes Governor Spanberger is, despite the historic nature of her ascension and supremacy to the House of Burgesse, she is yet to master it by democratizing the accountability-function, or equality under law as applied to the Virginia prison official, which despite the modernization of the nomenclature and dress, it's uniforms are as Bob Marley, lyricized, "uniforms of brutality" and the hypocritical and dehumanizing narrative it represents. Now candidate Abigail Spanberger became the Governor of Virginia on the simple and always straightforward critique of "affordability", which as long as its underlying dynamic is kept at arms length, has always been cast and recast in whatever verbiage has that captivating ring to the People's ear. But in this work of dispelling that undermining mythology surrounding, reform of Virginia's justice infrastructure and the prison system our analysis isn't hamstrung, by that status quo duplicity of creating distinctions where none exist and distinguishing interactions and relationships that have and share a common dialectic. We acknowledge and recognize that the dynamic of "affordability" on whose sails Spanberger made history, isn't limited to the price and cost mark up of a loaf of bread, but it is a function of that systemic existence of the peoples loss of faith and trust in the accountability-function and its ensuing impunity, which as focus of this work is embodied by the Virginia prison official. In other words, if "affordability" is that most basic, primitive and elementary critique of political-economy and its Social Contract, then nothing about its examination and interrogation can exist without a scrutiny of the terms the states organized violence has with its people and the most germane of this is that of the imprisonment circumstance, where each and every moment of the imprisonment is determined by to what extent are the prison officials, which in this case, the Virginia prison official, functioning and operating under law and not its extra-judicial formulations of its above-the-lawism impunity. In other words if Governor Spanberger isn't talking out of both sides of her mouth and unequivocally accepts that, even though she exploited a version of it, her "affordability", critique is fundamentally about holding impunity to account.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

LET'S NOT FORGET THAT OUR STATE LEGISLATORS ARE ALSO COMMUNITY MEMBERS MIRED IN ALL THE INGRAINED, BACKWARDS SUPPOSITIONS AND PREJUDICES SURROUNDING CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND THE VIRGINIA PRISON SYSTEM By William Thorpe

As a People are we twisted up with all sorts of anti our self-interest, backwards suppositions and prejudices pertaining to all aspects of life and existence, including what it means to harm fellow human, also as crime? Yes. However, that "yes", in itself isn't the issue, but what is, is our capacity and capability to recognize that, the "yes", is all about us, as The People and how we see and to what extent we understand ourselves. Because yes there are herculean forces arrayed against that simple grasp and understanding and those herculean forces are the way and manner that we have allowed and permitted "understanding", to ala Gulliver amongst the Lilliputians, be restrained by threads, subjugate us to wisp-o-smoke narratives. When we elect one of ourselves as personhood to speak for us and present our perspectives and understandings as mechanisms of our governance, what we have done is first and foremost elevated and empowered our collective suppositions and conclusions, irrespective of value, and what I mean by irrespective of value is this," it takes two to tango", meaning, whatever we confront as issues that were debated as political expression and the subsequent election are accepted as the normalcy of social existence, notwithstanding the fact that the consequences are extraordinarily disastrous on social existence. So for example, we can have Virginia Republican politicians in 1995 abolishing parole as a cure all, "final solution" as function of Virginia's criminal justice scheme, yet each and every successive and subsequent election cycle since, the Virginia personhood, is subjected to and badgered with this or that outlier of humanitys ability and propensity to commit pure, unbridled and unmitigated harm to fellow human as example of a generality of criminality, which despite the recognition by the individual Virginian that it is patently false and dishonest, nonetheless collectively as the voting public succumbs to its sirenic exploitation of the harm, which under any other circumstance, just as a type of lawyer is derided as an ambulance chaser, the Virginia Republican politician and their perennial exploitation of the crime issue, would be lambasted for seeing opportunity in "people's grief". The consequences of this isn't the fact that socio-existence and the personhood is stuck and caught up in an unimaginative and unoriginal idealistic dictatorship loop of a sort of nihilistic and morbid, theologic proof, of, an abstraction of human nature whose proponents find themselves in the contorting contradictions of their masochistic pretzel sophistry, but its in the fact that there is this rabid opposition, refusal and reluctance to accept the simple and everyday commonsense and practical understanding, that if the human being is multifaceted, then there isn't that proverbial one size fits all response and solution to anything, especial when our genus, as Homosapiens is the anticipation of capacity to know it all, not a fetishistic Omniscience, but the capacity to discern, attain cognition and conclude. Without this interrogation of our capacity, that a deep dive into our human condition and confront ourselves not as suppositionary constructs is what we should look for and extract from those we vote for as our governing representatives, what we end up doing is simply managing and treating symptoms and that is mockery.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

ONE OF OUR ANCIENTS INSTRUCTED, "THE GREAT ARE ONLY GREAT, BECAUSE WE KNEEL, LET US RISE" AND THAT IS OUR RESPONSE TO THE IMPUNITY OF THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Recently VAPAC (Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee) gave air to a piece of work titled: FOOD FOR THOUGHT, it was a structure tying Professor Chenoweth's analysis or should I correctly say observations, that nonviolent movements typically succeed with the actions and participation of 3.5% of a community or population, with our work of holding the Virginia Prison Official accountable and the subsequent reform of Virginia's Prison System. I WANT TO GET INTO IT A BIT: Holding the Virginia prison official accountable and the subsequent reform of Virginia's prison system isn't some pie in the sky talk, because just as the harm done to the Virginia prisoner, by the impunity of the Virginia prison official are exceedingly and supra real, as a matter of fact, the most conclusive deed done in the name of the People of The Commonwealth of Virginia, so is the work of its reform absolutely real and must always be seen and characterized as such. So with this understanding, it is clear that the only thing we are up against is ourselves, meaning our appreciation of what is practical and how we hold ourselves accountable to its realization. Professor Chenoweth's recognition that the momentum and participatory force of 3.5% of a population, focused on change and its ensuing course correction is a critical threshold of the necessary viable activity, for example it translates into 304,000+ of a population as Virginia's 8.7 million, which for all practical purposes, when tallied as reflective of the organic perception of Virginians expressing an encompassing and comprehensive grasp that the governance they're subjected to has nothing to do with "We The People.....", is the defacto honest polity. The work of holding the Virginia prison official and its motive force of 3.5% of population participation isn't dissimilar from that, defacto honest polity reflective of that requisite organic perception and grasp, that Virginia's governance has strayed away from whatever inclinations it had," Of We The People....", to the mature and specific recognition that for example the Virginia prison official cannot hide behind the gambit shibboleth of "public safety "while executing an administration of dehumanizing the Human Being in the form of the imprisoned Virginian. Whatever cognition Society as polity can have of " just punishment ", dehumanization sure as hell doesn't have and present any logic, because not only is it tautological and crass negation but, dehumanization itself claims and implies a presupposed affirmation of Human Life, then the prison official does what, negates it and we are supposed to accept such as what? The work of holding the professional behavior of the Virginia prison official accountable has nothing to do with acknowledging any of the prison official's self-serving narrative, which the people of Virginia understandably accord their Government's assertions and pronouncements, but it must be based on the most draconian and stern scrutiny the People can muster, because save for dehumanization as function and purpose of imprisonment, the prison official and specifically, the Virginia prison official, is incapable of articulating a philosophy and its professional behavior, notwithstanding a lexicon in its defense, that isn't feeble and pathetically idealistic.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

VIRGINIA'S ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ACT, IS THE OVERLOOKED NEMESIS OF HOLDING THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABLE AND PRISON REFORM By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

Holding human actions and behavior to account and the accountability-function is always ever present in human society and the Social Contract, however the distinction of its realization, is whether its process is relatively accepted or it is fraught with impediments and a everyday destabilizing struggle. In otherwords are the daily relations and Social Contract interactions a continuum of braining each other, in pursuit of what is fair and just, an understanding that we exist not in fear of the other, but on the fact that there is process of redress or the recognition, that if human life, is to be unconditionally valued, then, just as it is accepted that, the human capacity for "love" and its expression is taken on its face, without qualifications, then the acceptance of the innateness or inalienability of ones or the human idea of fairness, harm and injustice isn't dependent on some one else's, notions regardless of ability to right the wrong, the fact that a wrong has been done isn't debatable. But as soon as the dehumanization of the human being, becomes a fact, as we see and observe in the circumstance and condition of imprisonment experienced by the Virginia prisoner, we then see it structured and constructed as a denial of the prisoner's inalienable and innate idea of ownership of what is fair, harm and what is unjust by the type and sort of impediments and obstacles placed in the path of seeking redress or realizing the accountability-function. At this juncture I have to flesh this out, We, meaning the human condition, have been told that as a socio-person we exist in "freedom" as a relative and approximate condition as explanation of our experienced behavior of the Social Contract, its terms and relations, but as all things political-economy, which is the primary and foremost function of the Social Contract, it is euphemism and deceptive, because, what the Social Contract actually does is, it dehumanizes. The terms the Virginia person has with the personhood of itself as the Commonwealth of Virginia, is dialectically sovereign and subject at the same time, which because of such diametrically opposing relationship terms, from sovereign to subject, it then has a dehumanizing character and nature, because that historical developmental process of the Social Contract, hasn't truly permitted and allowed a confronting with itself, in order to resolve that antagonistic existence of dehumanization, which we see clearly revealed in the circumstance and condition of the Virginia prisoner. Because when the human being is denied of that inalienable capacity of that innate idea of fairness and injustice, because of the imposition of obstacles and impediments, in the path of redress as the Virginia prisoner is particularly subjected to, then the consequence and result is dehumanization. Notwithstanding the Constitutions of Virginia and of The United States assertions, of the people's right to petition government and seek redress, it is conditional. So for example Virginia's Administrative Process Act, specifically prohibits, it excludes prisoners from it and the Administrative Process is a fundamental function of Virginia's Government and even as the Virginia prisoner is comprehensively a subject of government, what then is being said by the prohibition on the prisoner's ability to access it, regardless of logic and reason?. The consequence of this prohibition is de jure impunity of the professional behavior of the prison official in all aspects of treatment of the Virginia prisoner and without confronting the impunity causing effects of the Administrative Process Act, the work of reform is a wink and nod

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

OUR VIRGINIA ORGANIZED LABOR GROUPS AND "UNIFORMS OF BRUTALITY" III By William Thorpe

I started this focus on Labor Groups, which this is a third installment, by quoting Bob Marley's incisive lyric, "Uniforms of Brutality" and its capture, (which I'm unsure whether, Bob himself recognized it as that intrinsic dialectic of "work" as the purest definition of the "liberty" or freedom euphemism, which his "uniforms of brutality" lyric illustrated) as that embodiment of it's aversive role and purpose of cowering or keeping Labor insubordination to the status quo assertions of Virginia's Social Contract with prison and the imprisonment circumstance. As we labor towards the unconditional reform of Virginia's imprisonment circumstance on the accountability-function of government and it's final return to the People of Virginia as the subordination of the Virginia prison official to their will, meaning exacting accountability, a lot of insight and actual understandings of everything about Virginia's social contract, that has been cloaked by that suppositionary and colloquial ignorance of, "taken for granted "by the people, will inevitably come into focus despite the fact that those who benefited from its "business as usual", knew perfectly well that its existing terms and culture, meaning everything was due to their machinations and their faith in the ignorance of " We The People".If the only function and purpose of the Human Being and the Human Condition respectively is "Work", then a value, with two characters will naturally come into existence, which is, the "value" of management or maintenance and direction, as it is expressed in the two characters of control and its subjects or objective, or who is in control and who is being controlled and when this is appropriated at the expense of the human conditional climb towards that mastery of it's all around realization or progress, it then transforms into that antagonism of exploitation or that condition of instead of pursing the "perfection of the unity of the people", war is instead waged on them, under the supposition that, the fundamental purpose of "work" as means of creating, supporting and defending the conditions and circumstances of Human Life, must exist as war between them. In other words the progressive dynamic of competition or that process of refining quality, is perverted into, that cutting of the nose to spite the face, War. This perversion is permitted because of and by the simple fact of "existence by acceptance", because Labor as it stands in its organized state, which in itself isn't commentary on the organizing motive and factor, but a critique of maturity, based on it's self-realization and the unequivocal understanding, that the organized fact in itself isn't a simple imposition but a natural fact of purpose or that synthesis of competition for itself transforming into the collaboration of self-interest. Or if The Human or as it concerns this work the People of Virginia, exist to work who then benefits? So, what we see is when this question isn't correctly answered, regardless of reason, the people are firstly warred on and here is the crux, by themselves. Yes there is that superficial recognition that it is foisted, a necessary mechanism of inserting that status quo self-serving narrative of "work" along with its inoculation against any counter exposé for the reason it's existence on the people is a mechanism of division. What this truly means then is the acceptance of impunity and that toxic lack of accountability, which we see as Labor its, rank and file arrayed in those "uniforms of brutality", diametrically in opposition with itself.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

OUR LABOR GROUPS ARE RELATIVELY ABSENT FROM THE WORK OF PRISON REFORM IN VIRGINIA II By William Thorpe

There is a reason why human behavior that unambiguously and unequivocally harms, besides the assigned distinction and categorization by Law, is, notwithstanding political exploitation by either being underscored or diminished and minimized, not comprehensively recognized as such, in itself. Which firstly tells us that whatever stance taken by and asserted by the justice application has nothing to do with the repair of Harm and it's commensurate effect and impact but instead, secondly has a more biased purpose, which then reveals and shows that the purpose or utility is in opposition. Now what I'll show with relative analysis in this work, is what I mean by, that biased purpose or utility is in opposition, with that opposition materializing into and manifesting as Labor and its organized groups, to be specific Labor is the target and why it is relatively absent from the work of prison reform and the specificity of this work, Virginia. I BEGIN: I've been breathing on and giving air to the analysis that prison and the imprisonment circumstance is all about being that proverbial stick to compel, "work", into an organized, in itself, entity, Labor, existing in a organized manner for another logic of interest, that even if it's own particularized interest intersects, with that "other" it is nominal and in order for that "other" to maintain that nominalism as its optimal maintenance condition, which is consequently punitive, the only method and technique our primitive Social Contract as dominated by that "other" or a specific interest bias has realized and developed is, "aversion", which is what prison and the imprisonment circumstance is. In otherwords our primitive Social Contract and its logic recognizes, that, that in itself freedom of action is only a for itself euphemism of liberty as work and its existence to produce for and on its status quo terms. In otherwords social contract recognized and legitimate person hood, is simply that of having the permission as freedom and its euphemistic liberty of working within it and for it. I won't waste the readers time defending this basic understanding, save to state that, the imprisonment circumstance as it is currently formulated didn't emerge and appear, till the abolishment of chattel slavery and its replacement with de jure Nationalization of slavery as criminal sanction under the 13th amendment to the Constitution of The United States. In otherwords as soon as work and its organized labor wasn't de jure compulsory, the imprisonment circumstance and its evolution as we experience it along with its opportunistic rationalization appeared as that metaphoric "coat of many colors". Our ancients have instructed, and I clarify it with, the Human Condition and its narrative is simply and primarily that of "work", which for analytic purpose, within the context of the Social Contract and its political-economy dynamic is Labor and its Organized motive. Just as the circle refuses to be squared, so is objective truth akin to Silver outside of its function definitive in existence for itself. Which was the relative relationship the human condition had with and understood work as, prior to the imposition of the exploitive and appropriating construct of its organized value, which prison and the imprisonment circumstance stands as that overseer with whip. Nothing I'm saying is to imply or infer, my position is permissive of asocial and harmful behaviour at the expensive of accountability. My position is, prison and the imprisonment scheme is a fact of Virginia's Social Contract, under law, its reform then is primarily that practicality of holding the Virginia prison official accountable and if the entire imprisonment scheme exists to cower labor, then Labor must speak.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982

TWO ASPECTS OF VIRGINIA PRISON REFORM By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

First of all, this is the orienting vantage of how we stand in relationship to Virginia Prison Reform: IT ISN'T A BOON OR DISPENSATION. I BEGIN: The Virginia Prison and its imprisonment condition stands as the most speculative and suppositionary practice ever assumed by its Social Contract, consequently it contains all of the Commonwealth's shortcomings, hypocrisies and antagonisms because its work is that of dehumanization, plain and simple which ensuingly corrupts according to relative proximity or it accentuates its inherence. The work of our analysis and its animation of reforming the Virginia prison circumstance as it holds the Virginia prison official accountable along with Virginia's Government accountability-function, is to refute and repudiate its ossified and idealistic narrative regardless of logic. This first aspect of refuting and repudiating its ossified and idealistic narrative regardless of logic, assumes a number of forms, with the primary as that of getting laws passed under the notion that the fundamental dehumanization of the Virginia prisoner is that of jurisprudence and in the general sense due to the activity of Virginia's Social Contract, is. However the relative significance of jurisprudence as a counter point to the impunity of the dehumanization of the Virginia prisoner, lies with, the true, pure and quintessential nature of the accountability-function, which simply is the unfettered and truly liberated ability to hold government and its police powers, which the Virginia prison official is a function and operative to account or to compel that recognition of subordination to that "Of, By and For the people", which the Virginia Constitution asserts its authority from, with its declarations, starting with. ARTICLE 1. BILL OF RIGHTS----A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS MADE BY THE GOOD PEOPLE OF VIRGINIA IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR SOVEREIGN POWERS,WHICH RIGHTS DO PERTAIN TO THEM AND THEIR POSTERITY, AS THE BASIS AND FOUNDATION OF GOVERNMENT [then it continues with] SEC.1 THAT ALL MEN ARE BY NATURE EQUALLY FREE AND INDEPENDENT AND HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT RIGHTS.......[in the spirit of JEAN ROUSSEAU and the theoretical kindred of THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 and its," MAN IS BORN FREE BUT EVERYWHERE I LOOK HE'S IN CHAINS"]. As such the existence of prison official impunity and its presumptions of above-the-lawism simply reveals the people's impotence and inability regardless of reason to subordinate their government's activities embodied by the Virginia prison official to their will and its accountability-function. This then matter of factly exposes that the character of Virginia's prison reform has a cognitive dissonance with the general and specific or particular order of which is primary and secondary, or which comes first. Meaning should we pursue enactment of laws at the expense of the accountability-function or means of their actual application as intended or anticipated or should we attain a actual means of holding the Virginia prison official accountable. An example of this is Virginia prison reform activism achieved a recent law at Virginia Code 53.1-39. 2, A 4 hour out of cell activity for the Virginia prisoner held in solitary confinement (under the euphemism, Restrictive or Restorative Housing) Va. Code 53.1-39 (1A), then the Virginia prison official at its Koncentration Kamp Red Onion State Prison and its other Charnel Kamps, promptly ignored it and kept on doing what they do, which is violate. Here is the rub, not only has the Virginia prison official, violated the law but they have exploited it as defense in lawsuits by claiming that its existence implies solitary is like General Population.

I have misgivings with recommending this below work as a comprehensive defense of my analysis on the Second aspect of prison reform in Virginia, on the simple fact it was produced at the present day, utterly craven Columbia University of New York. Yes, just as history saluted Columbia's vanguard heroics as being correct during the 1960's, so is its betrayals and complicities of 2025, by its administrative elements, indicted as that same ole same ole fleeing from the field, an infamous illustration of life imitating art, imagery of the seminal lyrics, "PICTURE ME BEING SCARED OF A N***A THAT BREATHES THE SAME AIR AS ME" by NOTORIOUS B.I.G. Nonetheless the work which is by LAURA FEELY, makes the point and case. The title of her work is DEFINING THE PUBLIC:ADMINISTRATIVE RULEMAKING REQUIREMENT IN THE CARCERAL CONTEXCT---54 COLUM. HUMAN RIGHTS L.REV. 368.The fact that our human condition is replete with contradictions and its Social Contract expression shimmers with hypocrisies isn't the exception but the rule and it takes the work of relentless analysis and implacable exposure to assert that yes we see that the "Emperor", no matter how strident the denials by those historical stooge and henchmen functionaries," has no clothes".In others words, the center of our antagonisms isn't holding and it isn't supposed to, which clearly defines that germane dynamic of the accountability-function of prison reform in Virginia. As I pointed out in the early part of this work, Virginia's prison reform work has this cognitive dissonance, of that philosophical, chicken or egg, distraction and the navel gazing contextual distortion of order of action, that only renders the status quo work of prison reform in Virginia as idealistic. I noted Ms. LAURA FEELY'S comprehensive work, "DEFINING THE PUBLIC...", because she tackles what after all is said and done with, is the main, primary and only question of REFORM, period. So how does what Ms. Feely is laboring at speak to prison reform? It is the crux of the issue, independent of context, because if our ancestors stated the obvious which is "Rights" or interactions and relationships are "Inalienable", then impediments, which per virtue of having to state the obvious, implies that there are, impositions and if we are honestly working to attain that accountability-function of realized humanness, then, basis of such impositions are irrelevant and the only relevance, is that of it's consequence. I'll use Columbia University's recent cravenness as example, which is simply this: on what terms can cravenness offer defense?. As such analysis is to, as it is specific to prison reform in Virginia, speak to the dialectic, which is reform and how to hold the prison official accountable, as such, what analysis reveals is not the logic of the prison official's impunity, but the fact that it exist and therefore what is permitting and enabling its existence. This then brings us to the understanding and fact that the impunity itself, is a structural lattice of Virginia's Government and its police powers again, regardless and irrespective of reason or logic, the consequence is impunity and we cannot speak of the just realization of Virginia's Social Contract, when despite that Inalienable sovereignty of its existence, it has the dehumanizing motive as Virginia law, THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ACT and we encounter it as the professional behavior of the Virginia prison official.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982