Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only
Holding human actions and behavior to account and the accountability-function is always ever present in human society and the Social Contract, however the distinction of its realization, is whether its process is relatively accepted or it is fraught with impediments and a everyday destabilizing struggle. In otherwords are the daily relations and Social Contract interactions a continuum of braining each other, in pursuit of what is fair and just, an understanding that we exist not in fear of the other, but on the fact that there is process of redress or the recognition, that if human life, is to be unconditionally valued, then, just as it is accepted that, the human capacity for "love" and its expression is taken on its face, without qualifications, then the acceptance of the innateness or inalienability of ones or the human idea of fairness, harm and injustice isn't dependent on some one else's, notions regardless of ability to right the wrong, the fact that a wrong has been done isn't debatable. But as soon as the dehumanization of the human being, becomes a fact, as we see and observe in the circumstance and condition of imprisonment experienced by the Virginia prisoner, we then see it structured and constructed as a denial of the prisoner's inalienable and innate idea of ownership of what is fair, harm and what is unjust by the type and sort of impediments and obstacles placed in the path of seeking redress or realizing the accountability-function. At this juncture I have to flesh this out, We, meaning the human condition, have been told that as a socio-person we exist in "freedom" as a relative and approximate condition as explanation of our experienced behavior of the Social Contract, its terms and relations, but as all things political-economy, which is the primary and foremost function of the Social Contract, it is euphemism and deceptive, because, what the Social Contract actually does is, it dehumanizes. The terms the Virginia person has with the personhood of itself as the Commonwealth of Virginia, is dialectically sovereign and subject at the same time, which because of such diametrically opposing relationship terms, from sovereign to subject, it then has a dehumanizing character and nature, because that historical developmental process of the Social Contract, hasn't truly permitted and allowed a confronting with itself, in order to resolve that antagonistic existence of dehumanization, which we see clearly revealed in the circumstance and condition of the Virginia prisoner. Because when the human being is denied of that inalienable capacity of that innate idea of fairness and injustice, because of the imposition of obstacles and impediments, in the path of redress as the Virginia prisoner is particularly subjected to, then the consequence and result is dehumanization. Notwithstanding the Constitutions of Virginia and of The United States assertions, of the people's right to petition government and seek redress, it is conditional. So for example Virginia's Administrative Process Act, specifically prohibits, it excludes prisoners from it and the Administrative Process is a fundamental function of Virginia's Government and even as the Virginia prisoner is comprehensively a subject of government, what then is being said by the prohibition on the prisoner's ability to access it, regardless of logic and reason?. The consequence of this prohibition is de jure impunity of the professional behavior of the prison official in all aspects of treatment of the Virginia prisoner and without confronting the impunity causing effects of the Administrative Process Act, the work of reform is a wink and nod
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
No comments :
Post a Comment