TWO FORMULATIONS OF SPEECH AS VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

There are those who hold the position that SPEECH isn't in the first class of Human Activity and that stuff we do with our limbs isn't and shouldn't be characterized as SPEECH, well I disagree, because SPEECH regardless, the vantage of interrogation is a priori and quintessential ACTIVITY. I BEGIN: The Commonwealth of Virginia is constituted on a proposition of Human Activity, as fundamentally that realization of the business of human existence and being as organizationally impelled. The Commonwealth of Virginia in this aspect isn't unique, because that is the general nature of life impelled. However considering the fact that my work and focus is on reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, my scrutiny is on Virginia's myriad and variegated expressions of its constituted Speech as business of human existence. When we speak of "beginnings", generally it induces misconceptions or a fun house mirror image distortion, because the actuality and its correctness that we assume definition, is not being described on the honesty that our words, only approximate a grasp of behavior that require quantum appreciation, as such what happens is a construct of suppositions, that we sub, un or consciously, due to that homeostatic impelling must now defend as absolute, which in fact is quite hilarious, buffoonish and revelatory of that human natural state of defensively weaponizing revelling in ignorance as hedge against the self-consciousness, or indictment, that our behavior and attitude belie and are at the expense of the awareness that our conclusions assume quantum vantage. So with this in mind, meaning, if a beginning is merely an approximate construct, then our applications of exactitude, certitude and the jurisprudential process of Law have to be tempered in accord, because what it tells us is the process of human business, preceding and antecedent is the accountability-function as proof of the Systemic critique. Those self-conscious revelers in the ignorance of opposing Virginia prison reform, formulate speech, that stands at odds with for example this, "THE VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THAT THE POLICE POWER OF THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NEVER BE ABRIDGED. Va. Const. Art. IX sec.6.THE POLICE POWER IS BEST DESCRIBED AS THE COMMONWEALTH'S INHERENT POWER, AS A SOVEREIGN TO ENACT LAWS TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH, PEACE, MORALS, EDUCATION AND GOOD ORDER OF THE PEOPLE AND TO LEGISLATE SO AS TO INCREASE THE INDUSTRY OF THE STATE, DEVELOP IT'S RESOURCES AND ADD TO ITS WEALTH AND PROSPERITY" [quoted from ARCHER v.VA. BD.OF DENTISTRY 2026 Va App. Lexis 114].What this ARCHER quote again shows is if a formulation is approximate, meaning its substance and terms are always developing, becoming more clear and in focus implying a robustness of debate as process of reform, then everything about Virginia as constituted speech speaks to the substance of reform as revealed through the class of Virginians most embodying that constituted speech, which stands as LAW. What I'm saying is something more than the assertion that the Virginia prisoner is "subject of law", what I'm saying is the Virginia prisoner is the class most lawful. This isn't contradictory. If Virginia's constituted SPEECH is Law and the one class of Virginians most intimately proximate to it are Virginia prisoners, because it created them, then they are the most lawful.

I recognize how discordant this fact, that the imprisoned person is the most Lawful of all the Classes of Society and as it relates to this work, Virginia's Social Contract and that is exactly the point. Because it isn't that the Virginia socio-person isn't capable of understanding and attaining the cognition of the correctness of THE SPEECH FORMULATION constituting Virginia, but they're not called upon to grasp that SPEECH is the driver, despite the fact that it is the arbiter of daily existence as socio-person, in other words suppositionary definitions and determinants then surrogately present that fun house mirror image distortion of THAT ALL SO REAL SPEECH FORMULATION, which then enables that petty-tyranny expressed as, in this instance the impunity and above-the-lawism of the Virginia prison official and the general corruption of the system or Social Contract, which is subsequently critiqued as an inherency. Before I continue let me give you how BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY defines, LAWFUL: Not contrary to law permitted by law [and it continues under LEGAL and LEGAL is defined as Of or relating to law falling within the province of law. 2 Established, required, or permitted by law.3. Of or relating to law as opposed to equity].Now no one struggles with the fact that Society or the Social Contract is constituted Law, meaning everyone falls under the ambit of law, every aspect, fact, interaction and activity are artifacts of law, even when an act is at odds with it, the reason the act is at odds is because of Law and not because of its commission. What Law characterizes is context which is a primary denominator of the Human Condition and the business of existence. What I'm showing is despite the fact that we are not called upon to be as comprehensive in our daily grasp of the basic formulations of the Social Contract, which by the way, the process of formative education or critical analysis is intended to inculcate and should instinctually orient our daily speech, but due to the shortsightedness of reaction and its one-dimensional pursuit of value exploitation, under the analogous thought, that the less we as the socio-person critically think the easier or efficient it is to Capitalize our existence, its habit of taking stuff for granted as if definitions, descriptions, characterizations, contextualization are a result of...[Genesis 2:19 and 20]...when the fact is regardless of whatever the biblical Genesis and its kindred plays in ones existence, it doesn't absolve the responsibility of correctly understanding that the Commonwealth of Virginia is constituted SPEECH and the quality of it's human business of existence or the socio-person's is defacto dependent on understanding and cognition. So even as the individual Virginia socio-person might not ascribe to and will even react to certain attitudes and characterizations as viscerally vile and offensive, those vile and anathema attitudes are being perpetrated in their name. We see this rampantly present in the SPEECH of VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME. So even as it is generally accepted that, Due Process of Law Mandates of Virginia and United States Constitutions have a real and substantial anticipation and expectation, meaning the accused must have Legal Representation, see how Virginia's Governance handled this fact..."THE STATE OF VIRGINIA ARGUED IN BOUNDS THAT PROVIDING LAW LIBRARIES TO INMATES IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY, GIVEN THAT PRISON WRIT WRITERS ARE " ILLEQUIPPED. TO USE THE TOOLS OF THE TRADE OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION".YET,IN GIARRATANO, VIRGINIA ARGUED THAT LAW LIBRARIES CAN BE USED EFFECTIVELY BY THESE SAME PRISONERS". [excerpted from MURRAY v. GIARRATANO: A REMEDY REDUCED TO A MEANINGLESS RITUAL pub. in 39 Am.U.L.Rev.765 by GERALDINE SZOTT MOOHR. What I'm showing with these excerpts as representative of TWO FORMULATIONS OF SPEECH AS VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME, is simply that impunity and its above-the-lawism isn't specifically an administrative process of bureaucracy run wild, but its a dynamic of inattentiveness and a second guessing by the People of Virginia in whose name everything has its approximate beginnings. In other words authority is first and foremost a dictatorship irrespective of formulation, which the context of formulation is how revelatory is the mechanism of the dictatorship. What I'm stressing is, yes there is substantial meaning in the description of Virginia's constituted speech, which we encounter in ARCHER v. VA. BD. of DENTISTRY 2026 VA.APP.LEXIS 114 as long as We The People of Virginia recognize it as such, [and here is we find dictatorship], because how are we as the people grasping and understanding... "THE COMMONWEALTH'S INHERENT POWER AS SOVEREIGN"[?], because "sovereign" stands firstly as singular and as soon as there is interaction, meaning once we encounter another human who is also sovereign, now we have an association or a cognizable and contextualized social contract, the basis of the interaction or association is of less significance, it could even be fatal, what is relevant nonetheless is it was SPEECH or ACITIVITY and this is that granular or quantum grasp which in order to compel, reform and for the specific focus of this work, reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, we must appreciate and function within its clarity. Everything elucidated and instructed in ARCHER as the Sovereign Police Powers of The Commonwealth of Virginia are specific and substantial basis demanding and commanding reform of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, yet its opponents exist causing the one and only question on what Right? Because the current state and condition of Virginia's imprisonment scheme is absolutely incompatible with the contextualization of its Police Powers, that stands first and foremost on the incontrovertible fact that the imprisoned Virginian is a Human Being and Sovereign. Because negating this fundamental fact isn't denial or abrogation of the humanness of the imprisoned Virginian, but rather it only reveals the value of Virginia's Speech or Virginia's Social Contract isn't to be trusted. Virginia's Social Contract is corrupt, Virginia's Social Contract is merely a perverted Supremacist construct a step ahead of its inexorable and inevitable accounting and we see it, in formulations of Speech or Activity that can only be classified as schizophrenic. From the Speech of the Virginian Thomas Jefferson of the Declaration of Independence authorship, whose declarations conversed his hypocrisies back to him revealing the context of a "sound mind" is also the purview of a diseased one. What was the value of the enslaved Africans to Jefferson and his ilk, wasn't it the fact they were Human? Even as the Jeffersonian world view denied it ?.My contention is we see the same thing with the Virginia Prisoner treated as "subject" of Law, when the quintessential formulation of the Speech reveals and points to the irrefutable fact that if Virginia's Speech is Constituted Law then the only class of Virginian embodying it is the Prisoner.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982