THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EXPECTS TO BASK IN THE ENLIGHTENMENT HAVING A PAROLE PROCESS IN IT'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME ASSERTS, WHILE UNDERMINING IT AT EVERY TURN BY William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes on

One of our dead and dusty Presidents is attributed with this, which I paraphrase, we are a Nation of Laws and not men. Parole and its process in the Commonwealth of Virginia is such a law and a Society, with the existence of Social Contract formulations as a Parole Process incorporated in its Justice Infrastructure, would comprehensively claim it as bona fides of enlightenment. Because besides the fact the antithesis of enlightenment is the haven of our human condition, we labor like hell, not in its thesis but its concealment and the dictatorial intention of it's deliberateness, reveals its corrupt-value. In other words, we excel at facades and hypocrisies as practice of what it means to undermine and sabotage our aspirations, which in this context, is that LAW MADE MAN and not at exorcising the corruption of it's above-the-lawism. Society's work at Justice and its aspiration of "repairing harm", has conditionally borne the antagonism of that subordination of LAW MADE MAN, so it isn't surprising that is where we see herculean efforts at undermining efforts of it's reform. The Commonwealth of Virginia is not an outlier in the work of undermining and sabotaging reform, which the Parole Process of its Imprisonment Scheme represents. However, the Commonwealth stands as a glaring reprobate, an incorrigible unrepentant actor, because embracing a parole process in its imprisonment scheme, was intended to rehabilitate, its civilization from the absurdity of its 1871 Supreme Court jurisprudence in RUFFIN v. COMMONWEALTH 62 VA. 790, that literally mocked the Speech the Civil War intended on annihilating. So along with other reprehensible moves, which the recent KING v. O'BANNON 817 F. SUPP. 3d 354 after 150 years exposed in 2026, the Parole Process and other reform moves of Virginia's imprisonment scheme were literally and practically intended to redeem and permit the Commonwealth to claim membership into a World moving away from the sort of dehumanization, it was accustomed to, which naturally its Justice Infrastructure reflected. But its one thing to aspire to establishing a set of human relations for a Social Contract, that professes to refute and repudiate, its once upon a time conventions, without actually confessing its misdeeds and that is what the Commonwealth keeps on finding herself dealing with. I want to use two incidents as example. (1) ADKINS v. LIGHTNER 2026 U.S DIST.LEXIS 114231, is a case chronicling a set of events that epitomizes a text book instance of undermining Law and when man resorts to that base extra-judicial behavior. JEFF S. ADKINS is a Virginia Prisoner who was denied Parole in 2021 and he subsequently challenged the denial in Federal Court. Some of the results from his court action are the circumstances revealing and exposing the undermining of Law. ROBERT PAUL LIGHTNER, the defendant, is a Virginia Parole Board examiner, whose function is to interview, parole eligible Virginia prisoners. Mr. Adkins discovered from the processes of his court action that LIGHTNER had concluded from his interviews with Mr. Adkins and I quote "RELEASE WOULD DIMINISH SUCH SERIOUS NATURE" [ of whatever Adkins was imprisoned for].This conclusion and determination by LIGHTNER, is what I want us to focus on and recognize how it absolutely destroys the entire construct and structure of Law and I'm not being hyperbolic. There are those who will argue that LIGHTNER is entitled to his "opinion", which can very well be overruled by the Parole Board in their determinative sitting, but that excuses a flaw in the process that is extra-judicial.

The LIGHTNER is entitled to his "opinion", retort, besides endorsing extra-judicialism, is lazy thinking and presents us with the fulcrum of the inherent corrupt-value of systems, i.e. Social Contract. Because it hinges on and beseeches an equilibrium of human behavior, as we have given it the attribution, PROFESSIONALISM, apart from the socio-person norm, indicates that anticipatory something more than "opinion". What I mean is this, the only reason and basis of the interaction, between Mr. Adkins and Lightner, is law and its anticipated professionalism imbued in Lightner. The Law of Virginia's Parole Process, provided Mr. Lightner, with the "authority" to "restrain" Mr. Adkins, by subjecting him to a parole interview. By exercising the interview and examination authority of Virginia's parole process, Lightner was declaring that not only was he performing a State function, but he understood the very instinct and intention of the Commonwealth in establishing a Parole process. What this requires is a comprehensive grasp of, not the mere mechanics of it's existence, but the function of parole within Virginia's Justice Infrastructure and this fundamentally demands that "professional" cognition of, not a speculative or theoretical grasp of DUE PROCESS OF LAW, but its Applied and Practical objectivity and this is where, what Adkins claims, [which was undisputed and unrefuted], LIGHTNER provided the Virginia Parole Board, that his "release would diminish such serious nature" [again of whatever Adkins was imprisoned for], destroys and betrays whatever logic the Commonwealth pursues in having laws. So let's understand what LIGHTNER is actually doing, which if the People of the Commonwealth are to demand an accountability-function of governance, that is distinct from the restraints of the political artificialness and whimsies of jurisprudence, that at times forgets it is subject, LIGHTNER'S actions must be seen as. Let's begin with the most basic, which is the pivotal apex and apogee of Virginia's Justice Infrastructure weighed the "nature" of Adkins interaction with it and accorded him eligibility of the parole process, which lest we forget, exist for one and only one purpose, that of releasing the imprisoned. Virginia's imprisonment scheme doesn't defer to a later on down the road of imprisonment and the parole process, that an ad hoc speculative imposition assumes a supremacy of authority and "POWERS", that exist no where in all the variegated forms and expressions of LAW, from its theological-intercessionist, to the secular pardon and commutative of a Sovereign or Executive, the privilege of second guessing what a mature Commonwealth of Virginia Jury has "done", which is what LIGHTNER'S actions as exposed by ADKINS speaks to. The LIGHTNER'S of the World have a selective and presumptive grasp of criminality and deviance, that is nothing short of a blind spot in what we can only suppose are indicative of reflexive finger pointing. But Rousseau's critique of the tyranny of the individual, is well understood for the due process of law, to ignore. The Commonwealth of Virginia is gravely harmed, when law violations at it's most basic, above-the-lawism, are knowingly allowed to exist, because it undermines the faith and trust of THE PEOPLE. Just as what a blight spot of fungus reveals, the demographic percentage being subjected to the above-the-lawism of Virginia's Parole process reveals to the greater society that irrespective of size the entire body politic is at risk.(2) Secondly the cases of MOSCHETTI v. OFF. OF INSPECTOR GEN. 2022 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 144143, MOSCHETTI v. NIXON PEABODY LLP 2024 U.S. DIST.LEXIS 95757, MOSCHETTI v. OFF. OF INSPECTOR GEN.758 F.SUPP. 3d. 533. MOSCHETTI also speaks to the above-the-lawism sabotaging the faith and trust of the People.

1. Virginia Parole Grant Rate

This is the single most important statistic because it directly tests the article's underlying claim.

Recent public commentary citing Virginia Parole Board records states that in 2025 the Board considered 2,609 inmates and granted parole to 32, producing a grant rate of approximately 1.2%. [cardinalnews.org]

That statistic allows you to ask:

If parole exists to provide meaningful release opportunities, what does a 1.2% approval rate tell us about the system's actual function?

The article becomes much stronger when readers can see the scale of denial rather than merely hear about it.

---

2. Number of Parole-Eligible Prisoners

Virginia abolished discretionary parole for most offenses committed after 1995, but a population of parole-eligible prisoners remains. [vadoc.virginia.gov], [virginia.gov]

A useful chart would show:

• Total parole-eligible population
• Number considered annually
• Number granted
• Number denied
• Number deferred

This would reveal whether the system is functioning as a review mechanism or merely as a procedural checkpoint.

---

3. Reasons for Denial

This may be the most powerful evidence for Thorpe's thesis.

Using the monthly Board reports available publicly, a VAPAC researcher could code:

• Serious nature of offense
• Release diminishes seriousness of crime
• Public safety risk
• Institutional conduct
• Lack of rehabilitation evidence
• Victim opposition

The question is:

How often does the Board rely on offense-based reasons versus rehabilitation-based reasons?

If offense severity dominates decades after sentencing, that would directly support the article's critique. [vpb.virginia.gov], [law.lis.virginia.gov]

---

4. Time Already Served

Another strong metric:

For each granted and denied case:

• Sentence imposed
• Time actually served
• Age at review
• Number of prior reviews

Readers respond strongly to:

"Prisoner served 35 years and was denied based on offense seriousness."

The longer the served time, the more forceful the policy question becomes.

---

5. Recidivism Among Released Parolees

This is critical because opponents will argue public safety.

Virginia itself tracks:

"The percentage of inmates released in a year who are convicted of a new offense within three years of release." [reports.dp...rginia.gov]

If recidivism among elderly parolees or long-term prisoners is low, that becomes direct evidence against perpetual denial based on speculative future risk.

---

The Most Effective "Data Box" For This Specific Article

The Numbers Behind Virginia Parole

• 2,609 parole cases considered in 2025. [cardinalnews.org]
• 32 grants issued in 2025. [cardinalnews.org]
• Approximate grant rate: 1.2%. [cardinalnews.org]
• Virginia abolished parole for most post-1995 offenses, leaving only a limited parole-eligible population. [vadoc.virginia.gov]
• Virginia law requires consideration of rehabilitation, maturation, educational progress, prosocial behavior, and community support in parole decisions. [law.lis.virginia.gov]

The Question

If rehabilitation, maturity, education, and community support are statutory considerations, why are so few parole-eligible prisoners released? 

NOTE AND ATTENTION THE ABOVE SUPPORTING INFORMATION IS ALSO A RESEARCH GUIDE FOR THE READER TO USE IN FURTHER RESEARCHING AND UNDERSTANDING VIRGINIAS PAROLE PROCESS.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .

IN FOUR YEARS "THEY" SCAMMED THE PEOPLE OF VIRGINIA OF APPX. $4 MILLION By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes on

And you know what unless the People of the Commonwealth say enough is enough. Enough with the selective criminalization, enough with the selective outrage, enough with re-characterizations and saying up is down and down is up and WE ARE ALL HELD TO THE SAME DEFINITIONS, this roller coaster existence of the exploitation of "harm" and "injustice" will persist. I BEGIN: During the Administration of Governor Glen Youngkin and his Republican cabalistic stooges, much noise was made about the Virginia Parole Board rarely paroling eligible Virginia Prisoners. Even to the extent that the Chairperson of the Board, Patricia West felt comfortable enough to publicly state (and I paraphrase) that she'd never vote to parole anyone imprisoned for a violent offense. I started this work with, "enough with the selective outrage, enough with re-characterizations".Because as much as it is historically and intractably convenient to highlight a type of deviance and criminality, the more destructively insidious and warned of "enemies from within" of the Social Contract are the nose thumbing of the likes of a Patricia West and the collective lawlessness of the Virginia Parole Board under Youngkin and egged on by the inherent lawlessness and corruption of reactionaries and in this case, Virginia Republicans, whose nose thumbing compromises and betrays that weary trust and faith held by "the people" in the aspired commonweal of the Social Contract. In an ideology-less Social Contract, (and contrary to the propaganda canned for us, nothing about Virginias' or for that matter, the National construct is ideological or driven by it, not to get into it, but a Social Contract structured on Ideology, is comprehensively Revolutionary, questioning and critiquing each and every aspect and circumstance of its existence. Imagine doing that in a deluded construct whose introspection is incapable of shaking mythological and theological presumptions and is endeared to that, sirenic Sisyphean-quixote wheel reinvention which is where Virginia and the Nation preen), the bastion of the People are the whimsy of "trust and faith" along with the enormous baggage of it's contradictions and antagonisms. The behavior of the Glen Youngkin appointed and Patricia West led Virginia Parole Board, for the four years of their Republican lawlessness painted all of this for us in the bright red strokes of nose thumbing, daring the Virginia People to say enough is enough. You cannot on the one hand claim authority from a law then with a wink and nod blatantly violate it. Because Parole and its process in the Virginia imprisonment scheme, isn't that of, should the confinement and imprisonment continue but why it shouldn't. Nor is it an ad hoc opportunity for a re-litigation, of an adjudication process that has already satisfied its Virginia law provisions or better put, a second guessing of a realized and maturely constituted Virginia Jury. A process that contains within itself Parole. Parole whose sole existence in the imprisonment scheme is that of "releasing the prisoner from confinement". This is the law, those Youngkinites on the Virginia Parole Board, casually and systematically violated, by failing to parole eligible Virginia prisoners, even as they kept on collecting their Virginia tax payer provided six figure pay checks. Which for those aggregate four years of tenure, added to an approximate $4 Million scam. This isn't complicated and obfuscating to grasp. Virginia law is clear the Parole Board's duty and legal obligation is to review the provision of parole, not preside over its denial. The Virginia tax payer wasn't paying Patricia West and co.to second guess the law and its will.

By William Thorpe 

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .

VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME WOULD RATHER WE FOCUS ON INDIVIDUAL VIOLATIONS, THAT OLD TWO STEP, WELL WE SHOULD BY NOW KNOW BETTER By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes on

There isn't a violation and harm inflicted on the Prisoner and specifically for purposes of this work, THE VIRGINIA PRISONER, that isn't reflective of what is happening in the larger and "free" Society, with the only distinction that on the Prisoner it reaches and achieves maximum intention and revelation. First of all I need to dispense with this confusion, that only serves, that "self-check" function of how the socio-person is "controlled", meaning our grasp and understanding of conditions, circumstances and situations which in turn determines our responses and reactions. Which is the theological narrative and present it's nakedness, which simply is, the contradiction of "Property" and its MATERIAL formulant, has always, when in that unanalyzed and uncritiqued state been that proverbial "fly in the ointment", imposing its confusion, which in turn has been symbiotically exploited by "our", human conditional short sightedness, as justification, or proof, grounding a narrative, that serves a truly monstrous Liege Lord, which our ancients in a brief moment of honesty, gave us (and I paraphrase), we've encountered the enemy and it's us. This work isn't going down that rabbit hole, I had to however establish it as preface, because our work of holding the Virginia Prison Official demands that before we engage the antagonism presented by the Commonwealth's organized-violence in its prison-official form, we recognize and come to terms with that, we've encountered the enemy and its us, because without our complicity in all its myriad expressions, there isn't anything for the violating narrative to hide behind. This is not the first time I'm stressing the fact, that Virginia's imprisonment scheme would rather we only speak to its countless individual misdeeds. Because it accomplishes a couple of sub-functions:(1) individualizing misdeeds, legitimizes its self asserted mission and (2) we unconsciously moderate our analysis and critique, regardless of intensity and extremity of language. Because as soon as we affirm the misdeed by complaining of its occurrence, at the expense of focusing on the fact that whatever logic presented by "Virginia's" imprisonment scheme is fundamentally fraudulent, we've participated in that Brer Rabbit syndrome of ignoring that the entire construct is covered in sticky tar. The issue isn't whether imprisonment should be aspect of Virginia's Justice Infrastructure, because, Virginia's Social Contract, hasn't ever democratically presented it for debate. Instead, its antebellum, chattel slavery origin was simply redressed and reclothed in other suppositionary garbs post the Commonwealth's defeat in its traitorous Civil War misadventure and foisted from the supremacist presumptions. So its one thing to speak of a Due Process of peers, when the qualifications of "peers", is just another presumptive contradiction that is yet, to be resolved. So when we speak of the Accountability-Function of governance we are not doing it within the biases of Virginia's aspirations, but upon that legitimacy, which the Great Schizophrenic In Chief Thomas Jefferson grounded whatever claim the rebellious and separatist North American Colonies had as logic, from The Britain of King George, with this in the 1776 declaration of Independence," To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world:", this Jeffersonian imploration of a "candid world", attest to an accountability-function of governance existing in itself.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .

SOCIETY IS STRUCTURED ON IDEAS PART XI By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes on

Here are a listing of materials, FAMILY, ALLY and FRIENDS of the Virginia Prisoner should familiarize themselves with and again as a reminder, these resources are also for our National Bruthas and Sistahs.

OBJECTIVE PUNISHMENT---89 U.CIN.L.REV.628 by ANTHONY M. DILOF DRUGS AND VIOLENCE---88 S.CAL.L.REV.227---by SHIMA BARADARAN [cited in WEIDMAN v. COLVIN 164 F.SUPP.3d 650, UNITED STATES v. FUGITT 2023 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 30319] ETERNAL LAW: THE UNDERPINNING OF DHARMA AND KARMA IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM----13 RICH. PUB. INT. L .REV. 49 by SHIV NARAYAN PERSAUD A CASE AGAINST THE KANTIAN RETRIBUTIVIST THEORY OF PUNISHMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR PUGSLEY---11 HOF. L. R.273 by LEON PERL [this is an important read because it exposes the speculations exploited by minds and hearts who capture elected legislators, despite what an electorate might have voted for or against] THE JURISPRUDENCE OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT FROM PLATO TO HEGEL---39 . JURN 97 by MATTHEW A. PRULEY [this also deals with the speculations influencing elected legislators unbeknownst to the voting electorate, who assume a politician's position on Justice is organically derived] POSSESSING INTANGIBLES---116 NW. U.L. REV.1226 by JOAO MARINOTTI THE TRIAL OF BIGGER THOMAS: RACE, GENDER, AND TRESPASS---31 N.Y. U REV.L. and SOC.CHANGE 1 by I. BENNETT CAPERS [this work is significant because it exposes the casual-ness of bias. The work is an analysis of Richard Wright's seminal work NATIVE SON and from my point of view all of theses sorts of effort behave as if we are fundamentally clueless as to the nature of the American Justice Infrastructure and the "why". Because we all understand and know the why, yet we act as if what we lack is revelatory insight, when the polemic has been repeated over and over again and again ad nauseam] FAITH HEALING EXCEPTIONS VERSUS PARENS PATRIAE: SOMETHING GOTTA GIVE---10 FIRST AMEND.L.REV. ---692 by REBECCA WILLIAMS [cited in STATE v. NEWMANN 832 N.W.2d 560---WISCONSIN CASE] MAJOR QUESTIONS HYPOCRISY---76 ADMIN.L.REV. 771 by KEVIN O. LESKE [this work is highly relevant because it is speaking to and exposing recent ploys and gambits by the reactionaries on the Supreme Court of The United States and illustrating the necessity for political attentiveness by the electorate, which is what this listing is framing] REVIEWING THE THREE TRUMP APPOINTEES: EX ANTE AND EX POST---1 TEX. A and M.J.L and CIV. GOVERNANCE 431 by JOSH BLACKMAN [this work is actually pathetic because it is caught up and stuck in the mediocrity of Conservativism and Liberalism, which is simply a statement of interest. What I mean by interest is simply this, political-economy is the foundation of society and the Social Contract, so a world view is simply an expression of methods and means employed to secure ones optimal placement within the business of human existence. Conservatism per virtue of its insularity is systemically corrupt, while Liberalism in its efforts at resolving those inevitabilities of the business of human existence, acknowledges the inherent corruption of approximations. American Conservatism can be reduced to the idealistic pursuit of supremacy in all its deviances, while American Liberalism is revealed as a mute, unwilling to provide the necessary critique] ERIE AT EIGHTY: CHOICE OF LAW ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES ERIE AS A WAY OF LIFE---52 AKRON L. REV. 198 by ERNEST A. YOUNG FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW OF NONCONSTITUTIONAL ERRORS: THE COGNIZABILIT Y OF VIOLATIONS OF THE INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS---83 COLUM L. REV. 975 by CHRISTOPHER D. CERF [cited in FEX v. MICHIGAN 507 U.S. 43 and in 1st,7th and 9th CIRCUIT cases and in two State cases]

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 . 

"[T]HE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT MANDATE COMFORTABLE PRISONS"-----THE MAJORITY IN RHODES v. CHAPMAN 452 U.S.337 (1981) By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes on

The title to this work is quoted from a "declaration" by the Supreme Court of The United States in 1981.From a law suit filed by Prisoners held at the SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, a Maximum Security Prison at Lucasville, Ohio, claiming that the double celling of the tiny cell space, meaning having two prisoners share a small space of 63 square feet, violated the Eighth Amendment to The Constitution, prohibition against CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT. My focus with this work isn't to critique that 1981 declaration of the Supreme Court, that "the Constitution does not mandate comfortable prisons", but instead to use it to show that as much as we say that the Social Contract or in this case Virginia Society is based on the RULE OF LAW and it doesn't get anymore lawful than the CONSTITUTION. The reality is we are not. The "we are not" aspect isn't that mere and patently simple characterization of the predisposition to violate. Instead it reveals and exposes, that there is an inherent corrupt value in structure. Whether at the conceptual and idea stage to its realization, its negation or that which will undermine it as corruption is there with it. Secondly, (and this affirms and proves the existence of the corrupt value). LAW is an aspirational frame work from which we leverage and critique that which will enable our affirmation of the fundamental and primary BUSINESS OF HUMAN EXISTENCE. In other words, law as Constituted Aspiration, is guide or theory, notwithstanding a salute to BLACK LETTER LAW, if the existence of a status quo and privilege has thought us anything, it has imparted that, that eponymous "norm", is just that, contextually idealistic. I BEGIN: The Constitution of The United States, affirms and prohibits certain concepts. Which we generally refer to as "Rights. "Then it plays the sophist gimmick of other concepts or Rights are left to the People. Notwithstanding the fact that the Constitution is the Supreme Law. Or whatever conceptual framework emanating from it, is defacto fiat, still and despite that fact it squares the circle with The People are sole possessors of whatever the a priori Constitution in its omnipotent Supremacy, is paradoxically silent on. When the Supreme Court declared that the Constitution doesn't mandate comfortable prisons, in 1981 as response to Ohio Prisoner's assertion that subjecting them to imprisonment in an insufferably tiny space, what those Jurist or Judges conveniently didn't say is, nor does the Constitution say Prisoners should be imprisoned under those conditions either. The point is this, ever since the Supreme Court made that declaration, those words have become Law, without any elected legislator saying aye or nay to it. Those words have been used in approximately 1,708 law suits in the 4th Circuit, which the Commonwealth of Virginia is under its jurisdiction. Those words just as all our words comprehensively have a bias, a bias which in the context of a Social Contract, must be unambiguously stated, so it can defend itself. Because as Judge MARSHALL stated in dissent to what his colleagues had done in the RHODES case: "With the rising crime rates of recent years, there has been an alarming tendency towards a simplistic penological philosophy that if we lock the prison doors and throw away the keys, our streets will somehow be safe". People, Judge Thurgood Marshall, had this insight in 1981.Forty-Five years ago ! and here we are in 2026 with Virginia Republicans, who are bereft and bankrupt of what it even means to confront their very own structural corrupt values, regurgitating, the same tired noises against Governor Spanberger, who at least is confronting it.

Law as I've indicated is the Constituted Aspirations of The People. Meaning it exist for the People. Created by the People. Emerging as a contemporaneous symbiosis of Who Are the People with what segment of the People and it's percentage are commanding the status quo presumptive benefit of privilege. This presumptive benefit of privilege, is the materialization of that inherent structural corrupt-value in its anticipatory existence, for the accountability-function of governance, which in principle is energized by the People. However, when the People for any number of reasons and factors are, incapable, unwilling and unable to energize that accountability-function of governance, then, the existing vacuum is filled with and by that presumptive benefit of privilege or in other words, an ad hoc stamp on virtually the very intention of the Constituted Aspirations of Law. Yes its easy then to simply describe the consequence or its result as its crass violation, which it still is. But what is actually occurring (and it is revealing that it appears initially in issues with the Justice Infrastructure and the subsequent Imprisonment Schemes) is an attack, at times consciously and deliberate, but for the most past unconsciously on the expression-medium or idea of the constitution of aspirations, then lastly its purpose or objective. As I initially stated my intention with this work, isn't to indulge in the low hanging fruit of critiquing the ruling of the Supreme Court in RHODES v. CHAPMAN 452 U.S 337, but to show how whether intentionally or not, declarations or speculations by those embodying Governmental functions, which Judges are, negate the very basis of their relative authority as it exist as the fundamental undergirding PROCESS, along with the unforeseen consequence inexorability. What this points to isn't the fact that for example the RHODES majority, mocked the very Constitution they have its authority of defending by interpreting actions in its name are actually such, with their "The Constitution does not mandate comfortable prisons". But what it instead does is (and here is its relevancy to our work of reforming the imprisonment scheme in Virginia), it reminds and reinforces the demand for actual political involvement and activity by The People. Because yes robbed Jurist can render their "declarations", usurping the ayes and nays of elected legislators, but the People with their Speech are the Supreme and Final arbiters of what is law and whether its formulation is representative of their Constituted Aspirations. What this means for the Virginia Family, Ally and Friend of the Virginia Prisoner, is simple and clear cut. A more deliberate, exact, purposeful and organized focus and involvement in Virginia politics. Involvement means developing, supporting and maintaining a level off "SPEECH", that is capable of recognizing that which is specious. When we are being manipulated and fed gimminks and gambits, instead of the accountability-function of governance. Those Ohio Prisoners in 1981, behaved even more responsibly than the relatively non-imprisoned average Ohio citizen, with their simple claim, that double-celling two men in a cramped and tiny cell was a violation of the eighth amendment to the Constitution's prohibition against Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Instead, what we have come to learn is, in the past forty five years since the Supreme Court ignominiously and insidiously reframed and re-characterized, the Ohio Prisoners cruel and unusual punishment allegation and its insinuation of STATE CREATED DANGER into the snide and snarky, "comfortable prisons", thousands of Prisoners who were not sent to Prison to die, whether its prisoner on prisoner violence, or contracting any number of diseases due to the nature of the confinement, have. We see the same thing in Virginia and its time our Speech indicted it.

By William Thorpe

William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .