There isn't any novel philosophy in what I'm saying. All I'm stating is the obvious and whether we are honest and willing to confront it, as stance against that inevitability of "when they came for the characterized undesirable, I said nothing, then I was next" is a formulation that is primordial as the synaptic habits determining Homosapiens. What I want to focus on is the real work of holding Virginia's imprisonment scheme accountable, which cancer causing water for imprisoned human beings at Koncentration Kamp Sussex I, is but existence of the fraud perpetrated by those who presume to dictate and determine, the definition of the Virginia organic socio-person. The question isn't about the speech of Virginia's justice infrastructure as in adjudication of socio-person deviance, but its instead the contention that, if we truly presume society structured on a Social Contract, then, the leeway isn't a simple prerogative of the dictatorship of intent and its organized violence mechanism. The fact of Virginia's adjudicative impositions, notwithstanding its assumptions does not contradict that after its all said and done, the only remnant are suppositions as such the relative Constituted aspirations of the Commonwealth cannot exist as crass canards, just because certain minds are haplessly mired in a political-economic construct that belies the fact that, thats all it is, a construct, that palpitates with the expectation of progress, which for you reactionaries, means development and its inexorable work of unifying the People and again for you reactionaries, the perfection of that unity of the people is essentially, the "just and right side of history" resolutions of contradictions and the unflinching identification and illumination of antagonisms garbed in their systemic antithesis. So we begin with, if Virginia legislators are at peace with the logic and, yes it is a honest one that, the human business of existence or its conventional description as, "job related" warrants recognition on its terms and all of this are structured on the existence of the human being or its purported unconditional affirmation. Because everything is about the context of human life, yet that same Virginia legislature can determine that the life of the imprisoned Virginian is less, unequal and subordinate to whatever contextual transitory ignorances are reptilian like emerged basking in the Sun. While ridiculously mocking the affirmative insight of the "job related" declarative by failing to recognize that by repudiating its logic in the imprisonment schematic, the entire human business of existence is undermined. This brings to mind the speech of the 1993 Rwanda Genocide, where its participants and perpetrators, would get themselves together in the morning kiss and tell their wives, that they were going to "work", a mundane 9-5 of slaughtering human beings and return home, have dinner etc. as any regular humdrum family home tableau, after work. The Hutu perpetrators of the "work" psychology of the Rwanda Genocide are, not unique. It is the basic and fundamental nature of our human condition in the absence of that unconditional affirmation of Human life. The antagonism of this reconciliation isn't with the existence of heinous crimes, nor is there dispute with its accounting. Yes, criminality and deviance can be held accountable without dehumanization, without mocking the sacrosanctity of human life with denigration. While there are those among the people working to affirm the equality under law, declarative, meaning sanction isn't dehumanization. There are also those equally at work in its undermine, pursuing the deception that the victim of crime should find solace in the fact the convicted is being given cancer causing water.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
