EVERY TIME I THINK ABOUT VIRGINIA EXILING ME TO THIS TEXAS PRISON SYSTEM, MY MOMS PASSING COMES TO MIND BECAUSE BOTH HAPPENED TEN DAYS APART By William Thorpe
“My critique of my Moms is simply this: A Black Woman whose life experience occurred post the 1400’s.”
This is the only explicit mention of the 1400s in the post — but it is doing enormous conceptual work.
Thorpe is not using “1400s” as a date.
He is using it as a civilizational marker.
2. What “post the 1400s” means in Thorpe’s intellectual universe
Thorpe’s use of “post the 1400s” is shorthand for:
A. The birth of the racialized world order
The 1400s mark:
- the Portuguese invention of the Atlantic slave trade
- the legal codification of African enslavement
- the emergence of racial caste as a global organizing principle
- the beginning of European colonial expansion
Thorpe compresses all of this into a single phrase.
B. The beginning of the Christian–imperial punishment regime
In his 2024–2026 work, Thorpe argues that:
- Virginia’s imprisonment system is a Judeo‑Christian punishment scheme
- the logic of guilt, sin, atonement, and suffering is inherited from Christian theology
- the carceral state is a religious institution in secular clothing
The 1400s are the moment when:
- Christian empire globalizes
- Christian punishment logic becomes racialized
- the “saved/damned” binary becomes the “white/Black” binary
C. The beginning of the world his mother was born into
When he says his mother lived “post the 1400s,” he means:
She lived inside a world built by:
- racial hierarchy
- Christian moral accounting
- colonial domination
- gendered subordination
- carceral logic
- economic extraction
This is not biography.
This is historical indictment.
3. Why Thorpe uses the 1400s instead of “slavery,” “Jim Crow,” or “racism”
Thorpe avoids the usual American historical markers because:
A. He is not describing American racism — he is describing the world‑system
“Post the 1400s” means:
- before the 1400s → a world not yet organized by racial caste
- after the 1400s → a world permanently structured by it
He is placing his mother’s life inside a 600‑year global structure, not a 150‑year national one.
B. He is rejecting the idea that racism is an American aberration
He is saying:
Racial domination is not a glitch.
It is the operating system.
C. He is tying his mother’s life to the same structure that exiled him
This is the key move.
The exile to Texas (2019) and his mother’s life (1930s–2019) are both:
- products of the same 1400s world
- governed by the same Christian‑imperial logic
- structured by the same racialized punishment regime
This is why the two traumas — her death and his exile — are fused in his memory.
4. How this usage fits into Thorpe’s larger 2024–2026 political‑theological arc
Thorpe’s recent work argues:
- Virginia’s imprisonment scheme is based on Judeo‑Christian atonement theology
- punishment is a religious ritual
- guilt is a moral currency
- imprisonment is a continuation of Christian sacrificial logic
The 1400s are the moment when:
- Christian empire becomes global
- Christian punishment logic becomes racialized
- the Atlantic slave trade fuses theology + economics + violence
So when he says his mother lived “post the 1400s,” he is saying:
She lived inside the same theological‑carceral world that now cages him.
This is not nostalgia.
This is genealogy.
5. How available is this usage outside Thorpe?
Short answer:
Extremely rare. Almost no one uses the 1400s this way.
Long answer:
A. In academic discourse
Historians and theorists often use:
- “the long 16th century”
- “the early modern period”
- “the age of discovery”
- “the origins of Atlantic slavery”
But almost no one uses “post the 1400s” as a civilizational shorthand.
Thorpe’s usage is idiosyncratic, compressed, and rhetorical.
B. In Black radical thought
Some thinkers gesture toward similar timelines:
- Cedric Robinson (racial capitalism)
- Sylvia Wynter (1492 as world‑making)
- Saidiya Hartman (afterlife of slavery)
- Frank Wilderson (the longue durée of anti‑Blackness)
But none of them use the phrase the way Thorpe does.
Thorpe’s version is:
- less academic
- more compressed
- more accusatory
- more genealogically blunt
C. In political writing
Almost unheard of.
Writers usually anchor to:
- 1619
- Reconstruction
- Jim Crow
- Civil Rights
- Mass incarceration
Thorpe bypasses all of that.
He goes straight to the root.
6. Why Thorpe’s usage is powerful — and dangerous
A. It collapses 600 years of history into a single indictment
This gives the phrase enormous rhetorical force.
B. It refuses American exceptionalism
He is not saying:
“America failed its ideals.”
He is saying:
“America is the ideal — of a 1400s Christian‑imperial world.”
C. It links personal grief to global history
His mother’s life becomes:
- a case study
- a symbol
- a witness
- a casualty
D. It positions his exile as a continuation of the same world‑system
The 2019 transfer is not a bureaucratic decision.
It is a 1400s event.
7. What this line does inside this post
Inside today’s VAPAC post, the line:
“A Black Woman whose life experience occurred post the 1400’s.”
Current page
does three things:
1. It reframes his mother’s life as historically determined
Her suffering is not personal.
It is structural.
2. It reframes his exile as historically continuous
His suffering is not accidental.
It is structural.
3. It fuses the two traumas into one genealogy
Her death and his exile are not separate events.
They are two expressions of the same 600‑year system.
By vapac
No comments :
Post a Comment