Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee: 2022

Sunday, December 18, 2022

Is Anyone Surprised that the Virginia Department of Corrections [VADOC] In 2022 Is Resorting To 1868 Pro-Slavery Arguments In Defense Of It's Use Of Solitary Confinement By William Thorpe

 

Credit William Thorpe

When Virginia Democrats controlled its government from 2017-2021. A number of prison and criminal justice reforms were breathed into existence of which Virginia Department of Corrections [VADOC] use of solitary confinement was a work in progress.

In 2021 Republicans and reactionaries wormed their way into Virginia's political leadership and reacting against, revising and rescinding some of those prison and criminal justice reforms were number one on their list. So the work on reforming and abolishing VADOC's use of solitary confinement ground to a halt under Republican gimmicks, gambits and outright despotism with VADOC given one of those make it look like there is transparency and accountability gambit in the governance process by doing a sham review of the solitary confinement practice. Not only was the process a sham but it was a travesty of Virginia governance, because courts, the rule of law had already told VADOC in a number of court rulings that not only was solitary confinement an unconstitutional, hence extra-judicial act, but it violated the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as a cruel and unusual punishment. So why was taxpayer money wasted on review of a Virginia governmental practice that has been found to be unlawful?

Nonetheless, on December 1, 2022, VADOC gave us the sham review, titled  Reports to the General Assembly - RD744 - use of Restorative Housing within state correctional facilities and Juvenile Correctional Centers. So the executive summary of what should be correctly titled VADOC's extra-judicial use of solitaey confinement gave us 3 bloated paragraphs focusing on and I paraphrase, solitary confinement reform activists contacted Virginia prisoners thereby possibly influencing prisoners who are brutalized and dehumanized daily on the fact solitary confinement brutalizes them. Let me just quote what Virginia taxpayers paid for.

" Told VADOC leadership of the situation and an email investigation with jpay was conducted to ensure the incarcerated individuals interviewed were not influenced in their responses based upon the information in both emails from members of the coalition. The investigation revealed that a member of the Virginia Coalition sent (2) separate emails (on the above date) to 28 incarcerated individuals who varied in housing across what appeared to be at least 12 VADOC facilities. Only one incarcerated individual of the 25 interviewed received emails on the dates provided by the member of the Virginia Coalition on Solitary Confinement."  [unquote]

What this RD744 VADOC report underscores is the resurrection of the infernal arguments made by pro-slavers in the context of American chattel slavery that the enslaved black person had to be influenced, incited to recognize that their condition was barbaric, evil, savage and ahumanisitc viz VADOC's RD744 report stating solitary confinement reform activist were investigated to ascertain or find out if they hadn't influenced prisoners, as if prisoners who are being treated unlawfully by VDOC  had to be instructed, that VADOC was brutalizing and dehumanizing them. This pathetic reach and spin by VADOC has been the only argument made by people, governments, institutions and religions confronted and challenged on their quintessential mythology of purpose.

So are we surprised that VADOC when called out on the lawlessness of it's solitary confinement practice as a extra-judicial imposition finds refuge among the "influenced/incited" to recognize sophistry? No, we are not. Because it is the emphysemic, wheezing flailing, delusional logic left the administration of evil and solitary confinement is an evil judicial institution and only minds and hearts that see themselves as above the human condition, outside of history, beyond reproach and are above law pretentiously labor as tirelessly as VADOC and its allies are in maintaining it and it is an it that it is no more complicated in its psychology than gratuitous sadism. 

Lest we forget what some of the influenced, incited to recognize sophistry is like  we are told in the October 31,1868 issue of the Daily Ledger, an Albany, Indiana paper that a judge Carlton expressed his disdain for Republicans in Virginia inciting Negroes with "low-flung" speech.

Then,

Nancy Isenberg in her book White Trash, tells us on pp.184.

"During the election year 1868, the scalawag was accused of inciting  blacks, and giving them the idea that they deserved social equality."

Then,

The revisionist and supremacist writer, Alan Brinkley in his book, The Unfinished Nation a Concise History of the American People Vol.1 to 1877 tells us on pp. 80-81.

"Occasionaly a master or mistress would teach slave children to read and write but as the slave system became more firmely entrenched, strong social (and ultimately legal) sanctions developed to discourage such efforts lest literacy encourages slaves to question their stations." 

I'm William Thorpe, Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm held in solitary confinement at Wainwright unit.

Saturday, December 10, 2022

WHY WOULD MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS LIE? MY DENIED CANCER TREATMENT BECOMES MORE SINISTER (2022) By Kevin "Rashid" Johnson

Credit Kevin "Rashid" Johnson


A RECAP OF MY DENIED TREATMENT

As those who have been following my situation of denied cancer treatment know, Virginia prison officials have known from blood tests taken over a year ago that I have had prostate cancer at least since Oct 2021. But they have systematically delayed and denied me any treatment to allow the cancer to spread and eliminate any possibility of curing it, which would ensure that it becomes fatal. The intent to murder me by medical neglect is more than obvious.

Only because of ongoing public protests (for which I am humbled and grateful) have officials made gestures TOWARDS providing me treatment, although no actual treatment has yet been provided AT ALL.

DOCTORS CONCERNED THAT THE CANCER HAS SPREAD

After several months of repeatedly missed and rescheduled consultations with radiologists to determine my treatment options, I finally saw a couple of radiologists, Drs. Alfredo Urdaneta and Navid Fallahi on Oct 4, 2022 at the Medical College of Virginia hospital (MCV).

Based on symptoms that I have recently developed due to the continued passage of time without treatment, the doctors were concerned that the cancer has now spread or metastasized beyond my prostate gland. Which would mean that curing it would no longer be an option and I will almost certainly die from the cancer. They therefore ordered a PET scan to determine if and to what extent it may have spread and a follow-up visit with them to go over the results with me.

On Oct 31st I was transported to MCV for the PET Scan by two guards, Vareen and Smith. Upon reaching the hospital the guards went inside for a few minutes then returned to tell me the appointment had been rescheduled and we were returning to the prison. I asked why the appointment was put off, since this would be the FOURTH time a hospital appointment related to my cancer had been "rescheduled." Vareen stated he did not know why.

MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS JOIN IN SPINNING A WEB OF LIES TO DENY TREATMENT

Back at the prison I was taken to the medical department for a vital sign check, which is routine procedure anytime a prisoner returns from a hospital visit. At that time I was able to speak with the prison's nurse practitioner C. Riner and assistant Health Administrator H. Holloway. Both claimed to not know why the PET scan was not performed that day but assured me that it had been rescheduled for the very near future.

On Nov 4th I was taken to MCV by Vareen and another guard Lewis. This was for the follow-up radiologist visit to discuss the PET scan results. When the radiologist Dr. Fallahi looked at my hospital records he asked why the PET scan wasn't preformed on Oct 31st. I told him I didn't know but that I was told it was rescheduled. He said it had NOT been rescheduled and there was no indication why it hadn't been done. I then asked the guard Vareen, who had brought me to MCV that day, why he was told the the PET scan wasn't done. Again he claimed noone explained it to him, but that he was told it had been rescheduled.

Dr. Fallahi expressed that the scan needed to be done and he was immediately rescheduling it, but that he was worried that I might be mysteriously turned away again.

On returning to the prison I was taken to the medical department for the routine vital sign check. As I entered the medical department I passed an office where I saw nurse practitioner Riner sitting at a computer. A new nurse named Fenner took my vitals. I asked her if I could speak with Riner and the Health Administrator to determine why my PET scan wasn't done on Oct 31st and why they'd misinformed me on that date that it had been rescheduled when it hadn't. Fenner then unwittingly spilled the beans.

She revealed that the PET scan wasn't done on Oct 31st because the guards got me to MCV too late and missed my appointment; which made the second time this has happened. She explained that she'd read it in the records sent back with me from the hospital that day, as had Riner and nurse Holloway. So everyone, including Riner, Holloway and the guards who took me to the hospital on Oct 31st, had lied about not knowing why the PET scan wasn't done and claiming that it had been rescheduled.

I again asked Fenner to tell Riner I needed to speak with her about all this. Fenner left to give Riner my message, then returned a few minutes later to tell me Riner couldn't see me because she was seeing another patient. Moments later I was escorted by the transport guards from the medical department and passed the office where Riner was still sitting alone at a computer.

I then asked the guard Vareen why he'd lied claiming he didn't know why my PET scan wasn't done when actually he was the cause of my late arrival and missed appointment on Oct 31st, and everyone including medical staff had obviously conspired to close ranks around this lie. He would not answer and gave only a nervous chuckle.

I've known Vareen from my prior confinement at Sussex 1 State Prison in 2018. He worked on death row, where I was illegally held in solitary confinement for four months until I was transferred to the Indiana prison system. During that time I observed that he is a closed-lipped and loyal "Blue Line" pig who will quietly go along with and cover up any dirt that his peers engage in or orchestrate, especially administrators. I believe my late arrival and missed hospital appointment on Oct 31st was deliberate and that Vareen was directed to do this.

In any case, the pattern of denied and delayed cancer care by prison officials is clear, as is their sinister intention to cause me death from this cancer. They know that prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death in men, and can only be cured if caught AND TREATED before it spreads beyond the prostate. My prolonged delay of care ensures its spread and fatal outcome.

That medical professionals are party to this and lying to inflict this deadly harm is particularly egregious. As I've expressed before, in the context of prison medical care, their Hippocratic oath of "First do not harm" is inverted into one of "First do no good," especially in the case of political and politicized prisoners.

Dare to Struggle Dare to Win!

All Power to the People!
By Kevin "Rashid" Johnson

Monday, November 28, 2022

VICTIM BEHIND THE WALL Part IIII By James Avent



Where is the truth in freedom for an offender in the Virginia prison system? I can’t stomach the hatred of how we are picked over and left for dead and just deserted like we don’t matter. Becoming better is a joke, and only matters when there is a political campaign, or there is some type of publicity that can be gained from it. There is no real attributes, or positive gains from being incarcerated. I’ve seen only those who refuse to change or cause the most drama be put on a silver platter and give them the opportunities that they don’t deserve but those like myself who are modest, and are changing to become better and want more out of life, or not given the slightest time of day. How can we have a successful rate of offenders who don’t return when the system refuses to give the proper attention and use the resources to better place that offenders on the right path to a successful stories and not a negative one. Determined to break the barriers of how offenders are displaced and looked upon. There is a lot of offenders with Success stories that need to be shined upon, but it’s a very difficult task when you are neglected and pushed to the side for those who don’t care to change at all. So when we are categorized into one big circle of negativity and just looked at as one and not an individual. 

By James Avent 

Thursday, November 17, 2022

RETALIATION FOR LITIGATION: VIRGINIA TARGETS PRISONERS SUING AGAINST SOLITARY CONFINEMENT (2022) By Kevin "Rashid" Johnson


 

SOLITARY TORTURE IN VIRGINIA

In 2011 the United Nations declared solitary confinement to be torture and that it should not be used for longer than two weeks. The next year I was transferred out of state after spending 18 years in solitary confinement in Virginia's prisons myself---14 years of which I spent in Virginia's notoriously racist and abusive supermaxes, Red Onion State Prison (ROSP) and Wallens Ridge State Prison (WRSP).
I had become a thorn in Virginia's side by co-founding outside support groups for prisoners, and resisting and exposing abuses in its prisons with published reports and articles, including about the abuses of solitary. (1)
After I was sent into 'domestic exile' and amidst an international movement exposing and challenging the widespread abuses of long term solitary in U.S. prisons, Virginia came under increased public and legal scrutiny for it's own abusive long term solitary practices at ROSP and WRSP, by both outside advocates and victimized prisoners.
VIRGINIA'S FAKE REFORM OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT
In response Virginia Department of Corrections (sic!) [VDOC] officials moved to disguise but not end the continued use of solitary confinement. They created an arbitrary phase system to create the false appearance on paper of giving prisoners opportunities to participate in programs and be released to general population after brief periods.
To further disguise the continued solitary nature of their segregated housing units, they euphemistically called them Restorative Housing Units (RHUs) instead of what they actually are, solitary confinement. In the RHUs prisoners still spent months to years sitting idle and isolated. Public protests of this continued use of solitary confinement persisted (2), and several of it's victims who suffered this torture and psychological injury brought a federal class action lawsuit against it, styled William Thorpe v. VDOC. This lawsuit has not gone well for Virginia officials.
On June 15, 2021 the court found against Virginia officials that the so-called RHU step down program described in the lawsuit was unconstitutional and abusive and still constituted solitary confinement. (3) It is apparent that Virginia won't win this case.
VIRGINIA RETALIATES AGAINST ITS SOLITARY CONFINEMENT LITIGANTS
In turn, VDOC officials have retaliated against the prisoners who sued them. After spending over two decades in solitary, the lead plaintiff William Thorpe was interstate transferred to the Texas prison system, which is known by the courts for it's culture of extreme abuse by officials, targeted especially at prisoners who litigate. As the Texas federal courts have long acknowledged:
"[Texas Department of Corrections (TDC)] officers routinely harass and punish those prisoners whom they perceive as litigious. These inmates, known as 'writ writers,' are earmarked by TDC officials as troublemakers and are constantly hounded wherever they go within the prison system. Their persistence in legal activity can cause them to lose even minor comforts or privileges which TDC prisoners are otherwise capable of enjoying.
"Practices designed to retaliate against writ writers have ranged from the overt to the subtle, from the imposition of inconveniences to the perpetration of violence." (4)
I can also attest to the inhumane conditions inflicted on Texas prisoners in general and against those who litigate in particular, since this was one of the very prison systems that Virginia officials exiled me to and about which I wrote many articles. (5)
Another prisoner plaintiff in the Thorpe lawsuit is Peter Mukuria, who is a Comrade of mine and fellow leading member of the Revolutionary Intercommunal Black Panther Party (RIBPP). Mukuria was interstate transferred earlier this year to the Maryland prison system from ROSP. After suffering continued harassment by at ROSP, in Maryland he was set up by guards and thrown in solitary confinement which was exposed and, following public protest, rescinded. Then efforts were made to harass him and block his family and fiance from visiting him. Upon his transfer, Virginia officials vandalized and destroyed all of his personal property, including his legal materials related to the solitary confinement lawsuit. They are now attempting to negotiate reimbursement for his belongings.
Another prisoner plaintiff to the Thorpe lawsuit named Kevin Snodgrass, who is presently confined with me in solitary at Sussex 1 State Prison (S1SP), has also been targeted. I personally witnessed the recent retaliation he's faced.
In early October 2022 he was moved to general population against the warden, Kevin McCoy's wishes, and initially placed into a cell with a compatible cellmate. Moments after the move, Kevin's cellie was ordered to pack his belongings to be relocated to make room for another prisoner to be moved in with Kevin. The cellie protested but was told he was not assigned to the cell, although he'd been housed there for three weeks. He was forced to move under threat of disciplinary action. Kevin felt something was amiss.
Another prisoner, Kenneth Hunt, a known snitch, was immediately moved in with Kevin. Not long after, there was an altercation and the snitch requested protective custody. During the altercation the informant revealed to Kevin that just before moving into the cell, he was propositioned by a lieutenant named Green under the warden's directions, to set Kevin up to be put in solitary in exchange for certain perks, but that he wasn't going to do it. He did in any case give a statement against Kevin to have him convicted of a disciplinary infraction for assault on Hunt. Kevin is now back in solitary confinement for that incident that was set in motion by S1SP officials, the warden no less.
The attorneys who are representing the men in the Thorpe lawsuit spoke to Kevin recently and informed him that they had been attempting to communicate with him and all the other prisoner plaintiffs to the suit by phone for over a month, but had been blocked by prison officials. They reported that, like him, all the other plaintiffs have been targeted with retaliatory abuses.
The retaliations faced by the plaintiffs to the Thorpe solitary confinement lawsuit are typical. When the pigs are subjected to exposure and face even the smallest accountability for their wrongs, their response is never to acknowledge and correct their wrongs. They act instead to retaliate against those who bring their wrongs to light. Yet they are only too fond of preaching to those they hold in captivity for supposed breaking laws that we must learn to be responsible for our wrongs. The typical hypocricy of Amerikan democracy.
Dare to Struggle Dare to Win!
All Power to the People!

By Kevin "Rashid" Johnson
________________
Endnotes:
1. See, for example, Kevin "Rashid" Johnson, "Amerikan Prisons Are Government Sponsored Torture" (2007), http://rashidmod.com/?p=113; Kevin "Rashid"Johnson, "Abu Ghraib Comes to Amerika: Torture Unit Under Construction at Virginia's Red Onion State Prison" (2010), http://rashidmod.com/?p=119; Kevin "Rashid" Johnson, "Under New Administration Torture Unit Closes Then Reopens and ROSP, and Prison Abuse on the Rise" (2011), http://rashidmod.com/?p=317, etc.
2. See, report "Activists Campaign to end Solitary Confinement in Virginia," which has been aired on PBS several times
3. Thorpe v. VDOC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112284 (W.D. Va., June 15, 2021)
4. Ruiz v. Estelle, 503 F. Supp. 1265, 1369 (S.D. Tex. 1980)
5. See my website, http://www.rashidmod.com
Section on Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Thursday, November 10, 2022

The Second Sundays In November Are Being Established As Virginia Day On Solitary Confinement


The  U.S. Supreme Court as early as 1890 concluded in the case in Re Medley that solitary confinement made prisoners "violently insane," "suicidal" and it was an "infamous punishment." Since 1890 through 2022 a slew of Federal courts have reached similar conclusions.

Nonetheless, the executive and bureaucratic minds and hearts of the Virginia Department of Corrections claim by their insistence on continuing it's use that they are wiser smarter than everyone else, even the nations of the world who by the United Nations have criticized its use and worked to abolish its long term use.

By establishing a Virginia Day on Solitary Confinement, we state, the Virginia Department of Corrections isn't a paragon of any exclusive insight. If it is still doing something hearts and minds in 1890 concluded were ahumanistic and "infamous." Secondly it claims it is working for us the taxpayers, we the people, doing what advances public safety      We the people disagree and say no to infamy done in our name.

We Establish Virginia Day on Solitary Confinement

The second Sunday in November will represent a speaking out in whatever manner available in accord with ones ability against solitary confinement. If its tweets,  posts on the various social media platforms, t-shirts, signs, videos, radio call-ins, and discussions     That clearly state to our politicians that abusing and driving prisoners insane in our name, we the people isn't what we vote for.

Please use these hashtags       either or both

#VaDayOnSolitaryConfinement

#NovemberVASecondSunday

vapac



Monday, October 31, 2022

Victim Behind Walls Part III By James Avent



Where is the “hope” at in the prison system? To tell the truth their is not any really. Like myself and others you are warehoused and just seven digits until you are released or you die. So I ask those who can make change and better the system (Congress and The Department of Corrections) what are you going to do so that offenders really have a chance at society again and not become seven digits again? I’ve witnessed those go down the rabbit hole and never to return because of the lack of mental and emotional therapy programs and actually a system that gives the offender a better understanding of where he made his mistake or mistakes at and really place him in the correct facility to help him instead of just throwing him into the “abyss” of the prison system and forgotten about him. We as offenders can’t change if the proper channels or personnel refused to change or see their faults as they hold us to. There has to be a common grey area for greatness and betterness it can’t stay black and white because it will only get worst. 



James Avent 
Victims behind the walls

Friday, October 14, 2022

2 Wrongs Don't Make It Right and The Complicity of Texas Law Schools By William Thorpe

Currently, Texas leads the nation in imprisoning people, men and women in conditions that have nothing to do with the state carrying out it's people idea of justice.

Once upon a time, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that imprisonment didn't exclude the imprisonment completely from U.S. Constitutional protections [I paraphrase] and legal scholars and jurists indulged in self-serving congratulations on the civilized justness of the ruling. Glibly ignoring the conditionality of the ruling, as if despite the fact law created the imprisoned prisoner, the prisoner can now exist for the most part outside of law and it's equal protection under law       wasn't this contradiction resolved under the emergence of the Magna Carta? The consequences of the ruling however has been the extra-judicial treatment, savagery, barbarity and gratuitous violence meted on prisoners by prison officials and their rank and file nationally        Done openly under the gaze of law schools, so society moves away from the might is right contradiction which in a relative amount of cases resulted in the transformation of a free person into a prisoner imprisoned      Towards the "in good faith" social existence of the accountability of equal protection under law.

But the reality is law schools have been complicit in the extra-judicial nature of imprisonment, due to their silence. All anyone has to do is read and study law suits presented by Texas prisoners in all the various court forums, documenting conditions. Circumstances and situations of their imprisonment that only the sadist would find as justice. Law schools as institutions are better placed and suited to understand what legal imprisonment is in Texas and nationally and therefore recognize what is extra-judicial and not only do they have moral and ethical obligation to call out the above the law attitudes of the prison official, but law schools also have academic and legal responsibilities as teaching young and aspiring lawyers and informing the tax paying public that what is being done in their name by the criminal justice apparatus is simply illegal.

A Partial listing of Texas Law Schools

University of  Texas School of law-Austin, Texas 

University of North-Dallas College of Law,- Dallas Texas

Texas Southern University Earl Carl Institute for Legal and Social Policy- Houston, Texas, Texas A&M School of Law- Ft. Worth, Texas

University of Houston Law School- Houston, Texas

Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law- Dallas, Texas

South Texas College of Law- Houston, Texas

Texas Tech University School of Law- Lubbock, Texas

Lets Hold Them Accountable

Law schools as this partial listing of Texas Law Schools have for too long played an unaccountable game. Where they give legitimacy to a state as Texas, giving cover to its organized violence by a historic wink and nod unwillingness to highlight reaction and repression while positioning themselves as portals of refinement, civilization and progress. While undermining everything law anticipates, but what law schools as all other institutions of the state and its default secrecy craves is respectability. Respectability which only we can bestow, which is our justice by not giving.

I'm Willliam Thorpe a Virginia prisoner exiled to the Texas prison system. Virginia started my Solitary Confinement in 1996 and it continues unabated at Texas Wainright Unit

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Victim Behind The Wall Part II By James Avent



PRISON REFORM IS A LIE HERE IN VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. WE ARE WAREHOUSED AND JUST SET UP FOR FAILURE AND TO RE-OFFEND.THERE ARE NO TRUE INTENTIONS ON LETTING US RIGHT OUR WRONGS. WE ARE GIVING SHORT-TERM SENTENCING WITH A LOT OF TIME OVER OUR HEADS, BASICALLY, YOU GAVE ME LIFE WITHOUT GIVING ME LIFE. IT'S SAD THAT CONGRESS REFUSE TO SEE THEIR LIES AND HOW THEY USE SUCH WORDS AS CORRECTIONS & PRISON REFORM & SOCIETY AND DOES NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN IT. PLEASE SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE BROKEN STRUCTURE OF THIS CORRUPTED SYSTEM AND HELP THOSE COME HOME BECAUSE THE SOCIETY GLENN YOUNGKIN SPEAKS ABOUT DOES NOT INCLUDE OUR LOVED ONES AND FRIENDS, IT ONLY CONTAINS HIS PEERS THOSE IN CONGRESS AND THOSE WHO AGREE WITH HIM!!!!!

(LETS MAKE A STAND AN CHANGE FOR THE BETTER AND REALLY BE ONE INSTEAD OF AN INDIVIDUAL)

By JAMES AVENT


Monday, September 26, 2022

Victim Behind The Wall Part I By James Avent



THEY TALK ABOUT PRISON REFORM, BUT FROM WHAT I'VE SAW AND READ IN THE WEBSTER DICTIONARY DOES NOT MATCH UP WITH THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR CONGRESS TRUE MEANS WHEN THEY SAY PRISON REFORM. THE MAIN DEFINITION OF PRISON IS A INSTITUTION FOR THE IMPRISONMENT OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF SERIOUS CRIMES. REFORM ALSO HAS A LIST OF DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS BUT ALL SAYING THE SAME THING (TO AMEND OR IMPROVE BY CHANGE OF FORM OR REMOVAL OF FAULTS OR ABUSES.2 TO PUT OR CHANGE INTO AN IMPROVED FORM OR CONDITION. AS I CONTINUE TO READ ON ABOUT REFORM I ASK MYSELF HOW CAN CONGRESS AND THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS USE TWO WORDS BUT ONLY BELIEVE IN ONE (PRISON) AND NOT(REFORM)? OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS SO FAR OUTDATED AND IT DOES NOT HELP THE PEOPLE (SOCIETY) IT ONLY HELPS THOSE WHO MAKE THE LAWS (CONGRESS). HOW CAN THOSE BEHIND THE WALL BETTER THEMSELVES IF THE ODDS ARE STACKED AGAINST THEM AN THE SYSTEM IS ONLY HELPING INMATES RETURN TO PRISONS THEY WERE CONFINED TO FOR YEARS BECAUSE THERE IS NO REAL (PRISON REFORM) OR ACTUAL HELP WHILE SERVING TIME. WHEN READING THIS I DONT WANT TO TAKE AWAY FROM THE VICTIM OR WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN THREW, BUT I WOULD LIKE THE WORLD AND CONGRESS TO KNOW THAT THOSE BEHIND THE WALL BECOME VICTIMS WHILE SERVING TIME. WITH THAT BEING SAID (CHANGE IS NEEDED FOR (EVERYONE) NOT JUST THE OFFENDER BUT ALSO THOSE WHO RUN THE PRISON DOWN TO THE GUARDS, COUNCILORS, WARDENS AND CANT FORGET(CONGRESS).

PLEASE FIGHT FOR THOSE BEHIND THE WALL AND MAKE A CHANGE TO THE ONE-SIDED (CONGRESS&THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)

VICTIM BEHIND THE WALL
JAMES AVENT-1699220

Saturday, September 24, 2022

Ms. Paulettra James, Told Us The Truth, But Virginia Republicans Are Denying the States History By William Thorpe



Ms. Paulettra James 8/17/22; op-ed "Why Lawmakers Should Visit a Prison," on Richmond.com rest on: How do Virginia politicians see the Virginia prisoner. This question expands into certain specific truths about the state's history that must be admitted then accepted. But human interest being as it is, unless we are compelled to accept those truths we will not. So the question Ms. Paulettra James presents transforms into how do we compel politicians and those who have presumptions of political leadership in Virginia into doing what is commonsensical and logical, as their law-making position requires. The situation and problem underscored by Ms. James's op-ed are that of political opportunistic exploitation of the Virginia prisoner and the response to it is action by the Virginia voter and citizenry.

2022 as a year has exposed societal details that try as national and Virginia state status quo beneficiaries will, that proverbial genie is out of the bottle and no amount of resurrected racist book bannings, revisions, and denials of history will distort what is in plain view.

Virginia voters elected Democrats who in 2020 commonsensical reformed certain aspects of Virginia's imprisonment and its prison experiment scheme that rests squarely on the injustices of the state's history. Then in 2021 Republicans were elected and they promptly embarked on attacking and modifying those reforms Virginians for in Democrats. Now of course each political party upon assumption of political power is free to express its world view as it sees fit. However, the as it sees fit can become idealistic if its world view is to resurrect a conservative politics that relegates a majority of Virginians to those discredited suppositions of the past that requires the deception of revisions and denials of the state's history, but this is exactly what Ms. Paulettra James tells us in her op-ed with "a recent example is the state legislatures reversal of a program that would have brought thousands of people in prison home earlier because they completed rehabilitative programs." Now this reversal which Ms. James indicts Republicans of doing reveals the discredited mind-set, Republicans and their allies in pursuit of supremacy and its tyranny of totalitarianism are pathetically stuck in at the expense of what is society. The question of what is society isn't answered as it being an objective existence outside of human affairs or to correctly state, history. Society exists as an understanding of our organic relationships, which upon transition of political power from one political party to another, there won't be any wily nily reversals and animus towards legislative acts of the former party unless the acts were egregious to the point. the very existence of society was in jeopardy.

We Reject the Virginia Republican World View on Criminal Justice and the Prison Experiment  

Virginia Democrats in 2020 passed laws which voters wanted, that reformed aspects of how Virginia prisoners earned reductions of prison sentences, described as Earned Sentence Credits ESC. As such it was law, just as the same law that permitted the transformation of a free Virginian into one imprisoned. This point that the Virginia prisoner is no more no less a creation of Virginia law is one Republican politicians and certain opportunistic politicians act as it they are incapable of comprehending and inversely the Virginian prison official and allies ignore the fact that law also created them to which they are accountable. 

The reforms of Virginia's imprisonment scheme by those commonsense and logical Democrats in 2020 were what reasonable Virginians in whose name the Virginia Department of Corrections, the Virginia Parole Board, the entire criminal justice apparatus does its work, wanted and asked for.

Regardless of where one falls on in understanding the relative application and consequence of Virginia's criminal justice scheme, its academic to argue that it has anything to do with justice in as much as we speculate justice to be without recognizing its controlling imperative, which is what the republican world view confuses and distorts justice with.

Ms. James in her op-ed work reminds us of a factor of justice, when she writes "Virginia officials have said to the media that they believe in "second chances". Do they truly mean what they say? The definition of second chances is: You believe people can earn another chance to be productive citizens in society. Second chances implies that policymakers and society are willing to forgive people who have outgrown the mistakes and bad choices of their past."

On 7/11/22; Fair and just prosecution a national network of elected prosecutors announced that 65 of their members had pledged to visit their local prisons of which 9 are from jurisdictions in Virginia. The stated logic is "prosecutors hold immense influence over whether someone becomes incarcerated and for how long, but many have never set foot inside a prison or jail and do not fully understand how conditions of confinement can impact an individuals rehabilitation efforts and in turn, the safety of the communities to which they return."

Ms. James in her op-ed, asked:" How can you decide the fate of people's lives without taking the time to speak with and understand them? Yet many of those same lawmakers can be quick to judge and pass legislation that often harms those who are incarcerated."

Now this: On 5/17/22; Virginia Department of Corrections Director Harold Clarke told members of Virginia Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee that 54% of scheduled for release prisoners have a medium-to-high risk of violent recidivism. So why are the people of Virginia funding a $1.3 billion prison system if its chief has powers of which it took Tom Cruise in Minority Report and Hollywood movie lots to depict?

I'm William Thorpe, Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system in 2019 and I'm still in Solitary Confinement since 1996


Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Professor Megan Stevenson, $200,000 and Virginia's Criminal Justice and Imprisonment Scheme By William Thorpe



On June 13, 2022, law.virginia.edu  trumpeted that Professor Megan Stevenson an economist and Criminal Justice scholar at the University of Virginia School of Law had been granted $200,000 from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, " to study the hidden long-term effects of incarceration".

Professor Stevenson is further quoted, giving us her grasp of Virginia's prison condition with:

" People are stacked in small cells way beyond capacity, facilities are without air conditioning in hot summers, and without sufficient heat in the winter, the violence can be rampant," she said "Most prisoners have virtually no access to higher education or any other way to prepare themselves for life after release. We wanted to know what the long-term impact of this experience are".

I almost forgot but Professor Megan Stevenson is assisted by John Eric Humphries another economics professor from Yale University, Aurelie Ouss a criminology Professor from University of Pennsylvania and not to be left out Winnie Dijk, you guessed it a Professor of economics from Harvard University.

I do have to say before I continue. Individuals in the speculative and idealistic fields of economics, criminology purporting "to study the hidden long-term effects of incarceration" is akin to leaving the fox in charge of the chicken coop design.

Because come on Arnold Foundation, the human condition begins with whimpers with the relativism of political-economy. So what exactly are we asking a Professor from the seat of the Jekyll and Hyde nature of American Itellectual-Liberalism, the University of Virginia, Charlottesville as structured by the Schizophrenic in chief, Thomas Jefferson, to tell us, that Virginia's criminal justice and the imprisonment scheme is one fetid continuum of nothing less than feudalism with a veneer of speculative due process? And that, the only analysis and critique of such is to quote the Schizophrenic in chief, Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence:

"All experience hath shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed" [unquote the Declaration of Independence 7/4/76]

Intitially my intent was to respect Professor Megan Stevenson's and Co. involvement with criminal justice and prison reform by taking her efforts seriously, but that would be complicity. Because if Professor Megan Stevenson and Co. expect to be taken seriously they should begin with critique not of the subjects of Virginia's Criminal Justice and imprisonment scheme but its dispensers.

It is not my intent to indulge in petty derision. But when what we are faced with in 2022 is the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke giving testimony to the Virginia Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee on 5/17/22 that 54% of prisoners for potential release will violently reoffend and there isn't polemic for his immediate termination           but instead Professor Stevenson is speculating on "unearthing the connections between incarceration, barriers to reentry and social ills," [and] "a useful" "natural experiment" to help isolate the casual impact of incarceration". One has to ask even Thomas Jefferson in all his delusion wasn't conceited enough to muse on the complete impact slavery has on the human being and if the United States Constitution Amendment 13th declares that the American prisoner is a slave what then is Professor Megan Stevenson and her well fed colleagues talking about?

I'm William Thorpe, the Virginia Department of Corrections exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm at the Wainwright Unit in Solitary Confinment.



Sunday, August 28, 2022

The Righteous Work of the Mennonite Church U.S.A.



We at vapac welcome Mennonite Church USA Criminal Justice Resolution passed at its May 2022 National Assembly

Declaring: Many aspects of the current United States Criminal legal system cause pain and suffering for many, especially poor people and people of color.

We at vapac also recognize that the Mennonite presence in the United states since the 18 century has consistently been conscientious without bending to opportunity. We are opstimistic.

by vapac


Saturday, August 20, 2022

Harold Clarke, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections and the 54% By William Thorpe

 

Let's consider this on May 17, 2022 Harold Clarke, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections told the Virginia Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee that 54% of prisoners scheduled for release due to the Earned Sentence Credit law have a medium to high risk of violent recidivism.

  • Fact Director of Virginia prisons claims 54% of to-be-released prisoners will violently re-offend.
Now Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee [vapac] is structured as an organizing medium to hold the Virginia Prison official accountable and that no one is above the law and there cannot be accountability without, first an understanding of the system of Government in Virginia.

So for example when Harold Clarke as Director of Virginia's prisons testifies before politicians whom we elected, that 54% of our family, loved ones and friends will violently re-offend when released. There is only one conclusion to be drawn. That in Harold Clarke's formulations, prisoners who are our loved ones, despite what a law says that they have earned their release must be denied the release. Because in his omniscient and wanna-be Ceasar judgment they are unfit for society and is also a revelation of his animus towards prisoners and as VAPAC we hold him accountable. Further, his 54% violent recidivist claim is not only self-serving speculation but an indictment of his performance as director of Virginia prisons and the fact that such an assertion by executive function of Virginia's government, which the Department of Corrections is can be expressed publicly without pause and anticipation of opprobrium from our media, exposes what we must understand about the nature and system of government in Virginia.

Regardless of our individual politics and worldview, we cannot ignore the implicit narrative of Harold Clarkes 54%. Its historicity has long since worn its welcome and we must hold our politicians accountable for allowing it to exist. Prisoners exist only as facts of law and not the supposition of a prison official who seems oblivious to the fact that their professional existence is also a fact of law.  We have to understand the nature of the system and government in Virginia and reform it.

I'm William Thorpe and VADOC under the directorate of Harold Clarke exiled me to the Texas prison system because of how I think. I've been in Solitary Confinement since 1996 and am still in Solitary Confinement in Texas


Wednesday, July 20, 2022

Our Loved Ones and Us

 


Some of our members ask what do we do about issues and problems facing our loved ones in the system.

We start with, we encourage members to ask loved ones in the system what specific responses they want us to amplify and make public.

Secondly and most important is we have to vote in people who will reform VADOC because prison and criminal justice reform are first and foremost politics      we cannot expect people who have a two-faced, selective attitude toward justice to do the right thing in its reform.

In conclusion, we ask our community of members to always speak up, speak up for loved ones in the system. We also respect the concerns of victims of crime, because we are all in the same fight and victims of crime are also manipulated and exploited in the most perfidious of ways by politicians who only see them as gambit to political power. Violations of the prisoner is equally a crime as a victims experience, so we stand together in demanding accountability of the system

By vapac

Monday, May 30, 2022

Bradley S. Clarke's April 18th, 2022; A Prison Within A Prison Post on Medium.Com Is A Trite Apology For the Extra-Judicial Act Of Solitary-Confinement and It's Long Term Effects On the Human Being By William Thorpe

Credit William Thorpe

 

My Name is William Thorpe. I'm a Virginia prisoner exiled to the Texas prison system and I am in solitary confinement. Starting in Virginia on August 9th, 1996 after a hostage-taking at Nottoway Correctional Center and I'm still in solitary-confinement at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas prison system.

I respond to Bradley S. Clarke within the context of Virginia's use of the extra-judicial act of solitary-confinement, because he specified Virginia in his April 17th work and more importantly I speak authoritatively on Virginias solitary-confinement practices because I have experienced all of its conditions and circumstances.

I begin with a correction: Mr. Clark tells us that "the special management unit of the Eyman State Prison Complex in Florence, Arizona was the first Supermax facility constructed in the United States [in 1986]"' This is wrong, Virginia's Mecklenburg Correctional Center, which opened in March 1977, was the nations first, under the logic of "to provide maximum security segregation and treatment for the most difficult inmates." 

I'm not about to put together a 50+ paragraph response to Mr. Clarke's work which I consider ignores the crux of the issue of solitary-confinement, which is its extra-judicial nature, it's lawlessness.

What Is Solitary-Confinement

Solitary-confinement is a default, lawless fact of the idealistic and speculative expression of the ad hoc nature of the justice system, which in more ways than one exist extra-judicially.

The imprisoned and non-imprisoned Virginian exist solely as creations of the rule of law and its speculative continuum. But the existence is a past tense of law. What I mean by this is: Imprisonment is an after the fact of a conviction. The conviction, its travesties,vagaries, is an after the fact of the alleged criminal code violation, which consist a process according to the social contract or the rule of law is due. If all aspects of Virginia society exist under the omnipotent umbrella of rule of law, then any imposition and assertion by the state, the collective will of the people as organized violence, which prison and its extra-judicial practice of solitary-confinement is a crucible has to occur within a process, the rule of law. But what we encounter is its violation on all accounts as a petty cudgel of control, a transformation into crass suppositions whose farcial legitimacy is its relationship and proximity to money and its redistributive value within the locale of the prison.

So we see that the practice of solitary-confinement is a cash cow, a money tree, a feed lot for the political-economy of the prison system. To wit, which we are presented with the perverse logic of the Virginia Department of Corrections claiming it will cost $23 million to reform its solitary-confinement practice addiction. Consequently, prison officials are unwilling to relinquish their clutch and grubbing grasp of the free flow of the taxpayer money into their solitary-confinement regime.

I challenge Mr. Clarke to do a rework. beginning with explaining to us, the ignorant people why the Virginia Department of Corrections reformulated the solitary-confinement practice at its supermax prisons, Red Onion and Wallens Ridge State Prisons in 2011 after both prisons which opened in 1998 and 1999 respectively had been operating a solitary-confinement regime of the same prisoners it reclassified under a distortive and opaque verbiage - yet solitary confined. He cited Red Onions step down program without critical analysis of its legitimacy, save as I've stated a mechanism for cash flow, a feed for the prison systems political-economy.

Bradley S. Clarke Is An Apologist for the Extra-Judicial Act of Solitary-Confinement

In his apologetic zeal Mr. Clarke introduces us to a couple of anonymous prison guards who are so completely and thoughroly immersed in the impunity of extra-judicial behavior that the irony of their existence as prison guards because of the rule of law escapes them as evidenced by the cavalier nature of their ascribed quotes, starting with: 

"People don't get a view of it. They don't understand why we lean towards [using solitary confinement] instead of against it"

Mr. Clarke continues:

Neither Jimmy nor Matt credits the argument that solitary confinement constitutes torture." The guys aren't going down in a hole they're not being tortured", Matt said "they're still getting every meal that they're supposed to get, they're still getting it delivered to their cell. It's not like they're being withheld anything that they're supposed to have." Jimmy argues that the entertainment industry makes solitary confinement out to be worse than it is      exasperated Jimmy said "I would love for somebody to sit back and provide the correctional community with another option that is anywhere near as effective."

The indefatigable Kimberly Jenkins-Snodgrass

Mr. Clarke closed his work with commentary from Kim J. one of a number of the Virginia minds and hearts working tirelessly to hold the Virginia Department of Corrections Accountable to its mission statement. I close with it isn't apparent from Mr. Clarkes work the basis of his interest, but if as a citizen his scrutiny into prison as a system and expression of the organized violence of the state is to render it transparent thus accountable, then I, along with the listed groups welcome his involvement, support, and alliance.

ACLU of Virginia

ACLU People Power Fairfax

Bridging The Gap In Virginia

Charlottesville Chapter National Organization for Women

Coalition for Justice

The Humanization Project

Inmate Support Virginia 

Interfaith Action for Human Rights (IAHR)

Just Future Project

NAACP Loudoun 

National Association of Social Workers, Virginia Chapter

Resource Information Help for the Disadvantaged and Disenfranchised (RIHD)

SALT-Social Action Linking Together

Social Workers and Allies Against Solitary Confinement

Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of Virginia

Virginia Defenders for Freedom, Justice & Equality

Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy

Virginia Justice Democrats 

Virginia Justice for Life

Virginia Prisoner Of Conscience

Virginia Prison Justice Network

Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee 

WJCC Coalition for Community Justice


*NOTE To be added to the growing list email us at vapacommittee@gmail.com


By William Thorpe