In United States v. Jabsie Dwayne Lewis, a case about the First Step Act which was nothing less than a veneered Frankenstein ploy enabled by Van Jones [who ever since he allowed reactionaries to brand him a Maoist has been kowtowing to Republicans as if those billionaires whose foot soldiers hounded him out of the Obama White House care whether he was aide to Chu Teh, when decimals of their non-taxed "loans" are derived from unbridled speculation in the PRC] to allow Republicans an obscene talking point of being criminal justice reformers during the Trump midterms [by the way young folks, black, white and Asian women saw through it and rejected, those Republican wolves in their synthetic sheep wool].The investigative journalist, Jane Mayer instructed us in her work, DARK MONEY that law is a function of politics and politics needless I add is the labor of ideas. So for example we can have Clarence Thomas and his intellectual-liberalism raving opportunistically about traditions when he's on losing end of the charade as he was in Moore v. Harper and denouncing it in Dobbs. So as this relates to judge Browning, specifically his analysis at VII of United States v Lewis 432 F. Supp.3d 1237 it gives a pure distillation of what it means to polemicize as such he has in effect dismissed the labors of Prof. Michelle Alexander and the historicity and tradition of her emergence. The value of her work The New Jim Crow, exist as a shiny object ferreting out the Brownings among us, for her and those who are on the just side of Social Justice to then engage.
I'm William Thorpe, Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit
No comments :
Post a Comment