THE VIRGINIA PAROLE PROCESS, THE IDEA OF WHO IS WORTHY AND THE QUINTESSENTIAL CRIMINALITY OF RACISM By William Thorpe

In 1954 the Supreme Court of The United States, stated the obvious in its Brown v. Board of Education ruling striking down segregation and I paraphrase that it was anti human and in extension a crime. So what did the pro-segregation parents of kids growing up in the criminal environment of segregation promptly do? They taught their lil 8,9- and 10-year Johnnys and Janes to start screaming that they want a, "white school ". Well those lil Johnnys and Janes clearly understood what their words meant, because they had heard enough of it from their parents. Those 8,9- and 10-year-olds who were being groomed to be racist and pro-segregation in 1954 are still living among us and are now in their late 70's. What I want to focus on is the fact society and the social contract has forgiven them and treated them with the privileges of what parole should be for the criminal. In other words, those racist and pro-segregationist, who chanted " we want a white school", whose racist and pro-segregation parents created and provided for them the criminal environment of dehumanizing and treating in particular, black people as "other" with the political and legal-infrastructure, B. Muse wrote about in the work, VIRGINIA'S MASSIVE RESISTANCE and has been intensively labored over with a quasi-display of jurisprudential professionalism and honesty in a panoply of Virginia cases I.e Taylor v. Northam 300 va 230 Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals 237 va 87 Loving v. Commonwealth 206 va.924 Brown v. Richmond 204 va.471 Harrison v. Day 200 va.439 DeFebio v. County School Board 199 va. 511 County School Board v. Shelton 198 va.226 Naim v. Naim 197 va.80 Stevens v. Commonwealth 70 Va.App.280 are as I've stated alive and among us in modern, contemporary 2023 society and contributing to the political-economic needs and wants of society.

No one will argue, what is racism, its character, its purpose and its supremacist intent. Furthermore no one will argue that it isn't par none destructive. It is tyrannical within the social contract and is the quintessential dynamic of corruption and the supremacist, indulgence. I say this to get at this: if the racist and the supremacist indulgence is accorded the redemptive privilege inherent in the parole process, then what are the terms and basis of the argument that relative criminal violations for the most part should be treated with prejudice and extra proscription?

Every harm and deviance within society has its roots in racism and the supremacist indulgence. Yet the racist, the pro-segregationist, the supremacist are redeemed on their in themselves terms, while the 15,16,17-year-old Jefferson, Washington, king or Thompson consequences of racism are entombed in Virginia's concentration camps, at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge State Prisons, which George Allen, the former racist and supremacist Governor of Virginia described as his crowning achievement and monument. So when we are given the narrative that the imprisoned Virginia prisoner isn't worthy of parole or the reform of the prison condition. We respond with why then are the racist, the pro-segregationist, and the supremacist worthy?

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit