Clarence Thomas and the history he labors in its defense, support and maintenance will say how dare the contrast and I get it, because the supposition is, its beyond reproach right?, Despite the glaring contradiction that, wasn't the American Revolution all about reproach and without us ,"We The People", our buy into the presumptions permitting the umbrage, there is no Supreme Court, no distinction of The Drug Dealer, no Society, no aggregate requiring laws, no politics, no supposed jurisprudential objectivity on which a Clarence Thomas can fume and shake his jowls at the juxtaposition. I chose the contrast of the street level Drug Dealer to not just the position of associate justice of The Supreme Court, but specifically and purposefully Clarence Thomas. Because Clarence Thomas presents a contemporary caricature of data point of our supposed sacrosanct Social Contract that allows and permits the most dense and sly of us, to see for themselves it's ludicrous antagonisms and deprive them of apology. If you've never read and studied Clarence Thomas court writings, I ask you do. If you've never heard him talk (yup he can) please do. What you'll encounter is classic conceit and deceit. Conceit and deceit are normal aspects of humanness. But when wielded by petty tyranny, (which is what all state functionaries are) it becomes oppressive. Recently a number of journalistic works have revealed and exposed Clarence Thomas as nothing more than a sophisticated panhandler, a gift acceptor from the extremely monied of The Social Contract even as his court writings has shown animus for such social relations. The political narrative supporting the Clarence Thomas contradiction would have us accept him as paragon of the American ethos in opposition to the recalcitrant existence of The Drug Dealer, whom as the narrative declares exemplifies the organic dysfunction of the drug dealer's environment due to governmental policies, identical to and imitative of the panhandler or, specifically "welfare".No, stay with me, don't pick your mouth of the floor yet, because that's just a fraction of the irony. Clarence Thomas who we're told is paragon of masculinity is extolled as a wholesome contrast to the deviance and criminality of the drug dealer, despite the fact that he's relatively a dependent of the Texas billionaire Harlan Crow, who supports his, familial manly responsibilities and not to ignore the spectacle of a grown man accepting gifts from another man, an occurrence even the most green and naive prisoner understands to reject, because just as the road to hell is paved with good intentions, gifts come with strings. Okay so I've contrasted, the behavior of the acceptor of gifts and sophisticated panhandler, Clarence Thomas with the most green and naive generic American prisoner, because as associate justice of The Supreme Court of The United States, Clarence Thomas has been on an idealistic and inane crusade against the American prisoner, deploying the most absurd of reasoning in his proclamations on prison and prisoner related cases and issues and if his most reviled, the American prisoner, understands the inherent corruption of accepting gifts, then on what standing and judgement is Clarence Thomas exercising with his industrial like singularity of gift acceptance?. Conservatism as thought and world view is idealistic. Its premise is simple it defends a or the status quo, as such its operative is hypocrisy, inconsistency, impunity and dictatorial, above the law presumptions, in one word conservatism corrupts. Contrasting the behavior of the street level drug dealer with the behavior of a Clarence Thomas, which means a rejection and repudiation of the ludicrous narrative that the behavior of a grown man Clarence Thomas existing, living and subsisting on the handouts of a Texas billionaire Harlan Crow is socially superior to the underground entrepreneurial labors of the street level drug dealer, exposes the conservative inconsistency and it allows us to encounter its corruption comprehensively. If fundamentally, the purpose and function of conservatism and its thought is to maintain the status quo, then it isn't paradoxical that we find Clarence Thomas a la Jabba The Hut, affirming it. Despite the anticipation of our genus, Homo sapiens, we don't know it all, nor does potential mean access. As such the elevation of those who lead us, those who exercise police powers over us, those who dictate and impose perspective on us, must be and has to be within the accountability of affirmative practicality. A fact of our humanness and condition that hasn't been distorted and victimized by the controlling mechanism of confusing us with the perpetual ploy of rediscovering the wheel, is the acceptance as fact, that we are social beings and this is borne out by our primary interaction of trade or buying and selling. So with this as the affirmative of socialization and evidenced as corporations being legally described as persons by Clarence Thomas and his conservative stooges. The act of buying and selling as expression of human value then reveals the corruption of the gift acceptor.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit
No comments :
Post a Comment