By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
Criminal Justice Reform, Law, Virginia Commonwealth State, Prison Reform, Prison Advocacy blog
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
If we understand the insidiousness of the 13th Amendment to The United States Constitution, which is, prior to the Civil War, enslavement of Black People was limited to certain States and acceptance of newly minted States into the Union was contingent on positions on slavery, and if the Civil War was an effort at abolishing the enslavement of Black People as political-economy fact and a way of life, requiring the death of over 700,000 Black, White, Native Americans and others, then what the 13th amend. achieved (which was also a craven betrayal of the War intended to cauterize the gangrene of slavery), is the Nationalization of slavery, with its..."except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction", qualification or as I've indicated a nullification of the amendment itself. What this, "except as punishment..." with a wink and a nod, permitted was the continuation of slavery under other euphemisms i.e convict leasing, prison labor (which a recent article in The Texas Standard underscored by revealing a Texas prison official saying and I paraphrase that the difference between the slavery practiced on the plantations which are now converted into Texas prison units, talk about irony, is Texas prisoners who are now slaves use tractors). I've developed this to say, the primary objective of The Nations justice infrastructure post-Civil War is to keep Black people in particular as close to conditions of enslavement as possible, as such every aspect and facet of Society and the political-economy are deployed and work in concert towards it. Our human condition and ensuing societies are constructs of language, concepts and definitions. Here is a quick example, a prison official assaults, beats the crap out of a prisoner who by the way is handcuffed, violates the prisoner. Now if your local or National corporate media speaks on it, the prison official's assaultive behavior is described as "abuse" or prison guard "brutality".Now were a prisoner to assault and beat the crap out of the prison official, media would report on the behavior as prisoner assaulting prison official. The instances of this sort of editorializing, description manipulation, event sanitizing go hand in hand with status quo supremacy and rule. In other words, words are either in support of or anti something. So when we now see that those who have historically been subjected to and in many cases destroyed by the weaponization of the word as descriptive label, FELON, applying it mightily and consistently at the former President Donald Trump, it serves a primary purpose, which contrary to the idealistic intellectualism in its purported analysis by the folks at CODE SWITCH, that forever its subjects and their organic base have clearly understood that the label "FELON" has a malevolent utility that has nothing to do with any speculations on "justice" and by saturating its smear over Donald Trump, its users are compelling the American establishment in whose services its historical deployment has benefited, that you either treat Donald Trump as you historically have us, if its usage against us has the same meaning and purpose. Now because the label felon, is exposed not just for its subjects to bemoan but for those neo-enslavers and neo-feudalist, a la Project 2025 in whose employ the label felon has labored to face up to the fact that the jig is up, we now interrogate The American Justice Infrastructure on equal footing without any sanctimony.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
Recently Governor Glenn Youngkin signed EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 36 and I responded with its a gambit. Look people there are a lot of misconceptions and misapprehension about criminal justice because there hasn't been a serious interrogation of what it means. So what has happened is The Virginia Prison scheme and its base Justice Infrastructure has simply been allowed to operate without any scrutiny or rather made to comprehensively defend and explain the "why's" and "what" of its actions. Society has always struggled with how to respond to those it accuses of violating its criminal codes because any close examination and, again interrogation is like that proverbial tugging on a loose sleeve thread resulting in the entire sleeve falling off. In other words any honest examination of the justice infrastructure will present society with realities of itself that it doesn't want to know about itself and confront. As presently structured Virginia Code 53.1 has general parameters governing Virginia's prison scheme including parole, but what it doesn't affirmatively deal with is The Commonwealth's responsibilities and obligations to the released prisoner (which is the most important part of the entire imprisonment scheme) yet Virginia's Government hasn't acted as such, yet Youngkin's EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 36 is confession that the question of the released prisoner from Virginia prisons is a responsibility of Virginia's Government, because first of all the authority to issue executive orders is a governmental function from powers the people of Virginia have seen fit to give the Governor or Executive of Virginia. Secondly, public safety which the justice infrastructure and the prison system are components is a primary function and responsibility of the Governor or Executive who currently is Glenn Youngkin. Thirdly and most important, there are reasons why certain functions and services are prohibitively reserved for Government and Public Safety and the Justice Infrastructure are some. Now historically Virginia hasn't recognized and accepted that it has a primary responsibility and obligation to provide the released prisoner with functional necessities. This work isn't focusing on the reasons but what I stress is this, all governments are of the people and eliciting function and service depends on and demands a literacy of this fact, unless access is denied by laws, for example during "jim crow", Black People were denied access and participation in Virginia's governance by laws, that relatively mirror the Virginia prisoner circumstance. So the fact Governor Youngkin wants to play footsie with the Commonwealth's responsibility to the released prisoner with his EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 36 as gambits to nonprofits, exploiting the charity gimmick only speaks to, as a people our illiteracy and ignorance or insidiousness by playing along as if the condition and circumstance of the released Virginia prisoner is an after thought that is shunted to the off track of suppositions and speculations of unaccountable and unelected Virginians. Look people Virginia's government is incapable for a number of reasons of thoroughly examining and comprehensively interrogating its justice infrastructure and prison system, as such we need another mechanism for that, what I, as a prisoner under its jurisdiction supports is a peoples assembly made up of people, selected from all regions of the State, including most importantly victims of crime and families of prisoners.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
Law as fact of a Justice Infrastructure is always two-faced or Dialectical, experienced on the terms of interaction. Even when the terms are corrupted. As currently revealed by the spectacle of the sex assault adjudged and 34 felony count convicted former President Donald Trump. What I want to focus on is the fact that the two-faced nature of law, is also intrinsically permissive as a couple of antagonistic incidentals relative to the Virginia prison circumstance will allow me to show and before I get all into it, let me clearly and unequivocally state that indictment of the corruption is squarely with the cravenness and complicity of established Virginia society. Solitary Confinement as type and form of imprisonment, has since its emergence been criticized and indicted by humanities Jekyll and Hyde nature, specifically that, singularly it is savage and barbaric and in the aggregate existentially anti-social. The Virginia Department of Corrections has forever deployed its use against Prisoners. Enlightened and progressive members of Virginia society allied with the instructive experiences of the Virginia prisoner have stridently and consistently criticized its use by the Virginia prison official. Numerous legal actions by the Virginia prisoner against its use have also been waged in courtrooms across the Commonwealth. Nonetheless, the political narrative on the use of solitary confinement has been usurped by reactionary voices, meaning it is distortive and hypocritical and as such is the case, dumbed down to its most delusional terms, where only shells exploding in the proverbial fox hole and trenches will compel a reorientation to the commonsense and progressiveness of the criticism of its use and it just so happened that the 2020 global pandemic of Covid-19 and society's lockdown, (which weirdly but apt is a prison term) presented that proverbial shell in fox hole moment, by the relative sequestration of people to their homes and the subsequent limited mimicry of aspects of solitary confinement thereby causing vociferous protestations, ironically using the same fundamental arguments, critics have been using against it in the prison context. What is noteworthy and revealing about the parameters of the anti-Covid-19 lockdown protest is how those reactionaries who have forever "extolled" the positivism of and defended the use of solitary confinement against, in this instance the Virginia prisoner quickly realized its existential anti-sociableness and barbarity, when opposing it's imposition on society writ large. My emphasis with this work isn't on the existing compromising dissonance between supposed justice and its crass revenge or arbitrary vindictiveness which we know is it's true nature advanced by the reactionary mind that has been revealed by their cries of foul, due to their Covid-19 lockdown experiences .Because, if the Covid-19 lockdown was gratuitously cruel and existentially anti-social as critiqued by its detractors, thereby causing a gamut of social ills from suicides to all sorts of substance abuses, then it is clear that it is an "unusual" punishment, to subject a prisoner to, as such there isn't any debate to be held, there isn't any jurisprudential gymnastics be performed in determining that as a fact of The Commonwealth of Virginia's conditions of confinement, it has no place.
Governor Glenn Youngkin signed EXECUTIVE ORDER #36 dealing with Virginia Prisoners and the only correct and accurate thing I can, straight faced say about it without becoming derisive is its a gambit. A gambit has a host of synonyms and what I will for now say is, Executive Order #36 is a diversion still it reveals a fundamental truth about Virginia's and to wit The Nations Justice Infrastructure, which is, it supposes "control" or subordination as euphemism for "justice". Because even if we are daft as daft can be, Governor Glenn Youngkin's cavorting with the sex assault adjudged, 34 felony count convicted, former President Donald Trump, The Nations notorious felon has unambiguously and unequivocally declared, (what some of us already knew) that the talk of justice, is just that a convenience. So in Youngkin's Executive Order #36 he calls for Virginians to step up as volunteers to (and I'm paraphrasing) shepherd the reentry of released Virginia prisoners into society. Now facially it seems like a commonsense and reasonable proposition right? But you're wrong. Let's say a prisoner was confined for multiple decades with The Commonwealth of Virginia spending hundreds of thousands of dollars for it. So now some of the people of Virginia are being asked to do what? Volunteer mentorship of the released Virginian? When the defacto responsibility for the prisoner was ALL of the people of Virginia and their exercised prerogative of sanctioning alleged behavior by the imprisonment and shouldn't the period have equipped the imprisoned Virginian with functional necessities anticipating release and reentry into society? But thats the problem, Virginia's along with the Nations imprisonment scheme was never intended to repair anything other than scapegoat prisoners as a diversion for the fraud within the social contract and what Governor Youngkin has done with his Executive Order #36 is compound the sham thats the criminal justice system, but what his order also does is reveal or rather confirm the infirmity of his judgement of cavorting and endorsing the felon, Donald Trump. Should I give The Governor the benefit of the doubt that, his Executive Order #36 is a result of progressive thought? I can but it would be an idealistic indulgence because the conditions of confinement created by The Virginia Department of Corrections, extra judicially imposed on the Virginia prisoner and enabled by his approval due to his installment of its Director harms the imprisoned Virginian. Which is what before there is any discussion of window dressing gambits has to be tackled and resolved. Governor Glenn Youngkin can access the true nature of imprisonment administered by his Virginia Department of Corrections. The abject dehumanization, deprivation of meals and even when provided, substandard and malnutritional, the abuse and assaults, the framing, fabrication of infractions purposefully intended to extend the imprisonment, health degradation, mentally and physically, the practice of shipping prisoners off to other States prison systems, thousands of miles away from family, to name some of the conditions. This is what for whatever reason Governor Youngkin is ignoring with his support for Donald Trump. Youngkin's reasons could very well be based on the certainty that the people of New York got it wrong by convicting Trump. Well there are thousands of Virginians who also feel the same about their loved ones and friends convicted by Virginia's justice system who feel the system got it wrong and was corrupt, but don't have Youngkin's megaphone. There are also sex assault victims, victims of fraud who find it reprehensible that their Governor is betraying them by supporting Trump and his crimes.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982.
The Vicious Cycle of Incarceration: How Low-Level Offenders Become Long-Term Prisoners in a Profit-Driven System
In the United States, millions of individuals find themselves incarcerated each year, often for low-level, nonviolent offenses. Crimes such as shoplifting, minor drug possession, or technical violations of parole—actions that reflect underlying social and economic issues rather than inherent criminality—routinely lead to prison sentences. For many, this initial entry into the criminal justice system becomes the beginning of a much longer and more dangerous journey. The prison environment, which should ideally focus on rehabilitation and reintegration, often becomes a breeding ground for violence and criminal behavior. This environment traps inmates in a cycle of escalating violence and extended incarceration, ultimately benefiting a prison system that profits from keeping people locked up for as long as possible.
The Path from Low-Level Crimes to Prolonged Incarceration
The journey to prison for many individuals begins with what are often considered minor infractions: shoplifting, possession of small amounts of illegal substances, or violating parole conditions that have little to do with public safety. These low-level offenses are frequently tied to broader societal issues such as poverty, lack of education, mental health struggles, and substance abuse. Instead of addressing these root causes through social services, education, or treatment programs, the criminal justice system too often responds with incarceration—a response that places individuals in an environment that is inherently punitive and often hostile.
Once inside the prison system, the reality of incarceration is stark and brutal. U.S. prisons are frequently overcrowded, underfunded, and plagued by violence. Inmates, particularly those who enter the system for nonviolent offenses, are thrust into a world where survival depends on adopting the very behaviors that the prison system is supposed to discourage. Violence, intimidation, and aggression become necessary tools for self-preservation in an environment where physical and psychological safety are constantly under threat.
In this hostile setting, nonviolent offenders are often forced to align with gangs or other violent groups as a means of protection. What began as a low-level offense quickly escalates as inmates engage in violent behavior to protect themselves or to navigate the complex social dynamics within prison. These acts of violence, whether for self-defense or as a result of coercion, frequently lead to additional charges, lengthening sentences and entrenching individuals deeper within the prison system. Thus, what might have started as a short-term sentence for a minor crime can easily spiral into a prolonged incarceration.
The Role of the Profit Motive in Mass Incarceration
At the core of this issue lies the profit motive that drives much of the U.S. prison system. The rise of private prisons in the 1980s, coupled with policies that incentivize the incarceration of more individuals for longer periods, has created a system that is financially dependent on mass incarceration. Private prison companies, as well as state and federal facilities that contract with these companies, earn revenue based on the number of inmates they house. This financial model creates a perverse incentive to maintain high incarceration rates and extend sentences, even when doing so is not in the interest of public safety or justice.
This profit-driven approach to incarceration has profound consequences. It encourages the criminalization of behaviors that, in a different context, might be treated as minor infractions or even normal responses to the harsh conditions of prison life. For example, acts of self-defense or participation in prison violence—behavior that might be seen as necessary for survival in a brutal environment—are often met with additional charges. These charges lead to extended sentences, trapping inmates in a cycle of violence and incarceration that is difficult, if not impossible, to escape.
Moreover, the prison system's focus on profit over rehabilitation means that inmates often receive little to no support in addressing the issues that led to their incarceration in the first place. Programs that focus on education, vocational training, mental health care, and substance abuse treatment are underfunded and underutilized. Without access to these critical services, inmates are released back into society ill-equipped to reintegrate, increasing the likelihood of recidivism and ensuring a steady stream of individuals cycling in and out of the prison system. This cycle is not just a tragic consequence of a flawed system; it is a profitable enterprise for those who benefit from keeping prison beds full.
The Human Cost of a Broken System
The human cost of this profit-driven system is staggering. For the individuals caught in this cycle, the experience of incarceration is not just a temporary loss of freedom—it is a life-altering ordeal that often leaves them more damaged and more likely to reoffend. Instead of receiving the support and guidance needed to rehabilitate, inmates are often hardened by the violent and dehumanizing conditions of prison life. The psychological toll of living in constant fear, the physical injuries sustained in violent confrontations, and the social isolation from family and community all contribute to a downward spiral that is difficult to reverse.
Families and communities also bear the brunt of this broken system. The over-incarceration of individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities, destabilizes families, disrupts social networks, and perpetuates cycles of poverty and disenfranchisement. Children grow up without parents, communities lose members who might otherwise contribute positively, and the broader society bears the economic costs of maintaining an ever-growing prison population.
Furthermore, the prison system's impact is disproportionately felt by people of color, particularly Black and Latino individuals. These communities are overrepresented in the prison population, reflecting broader systemic inequalities in the criminal justice system. The targeting of these communities for low-level offenses, combined with the harsh sentences imposed for minor infractions, perpetuates a cycle of discrimination and disenfranchisement that extends far beyond the prison walls.
The Urgent Need for a Paradigm Shift
To break this cycle of violence, extended incarceration, and profit-driven punishment, there must be a fundamental shift in how society views and administers justice. The prison system should not be a for-profit enterprise but a public institution dedicated to the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals. Achieving this requires a complete overhaul of current policies and practices, focusing on human dignity, social justice, and the well-being of communities.
Decriminalization and Alternative Sentencing: One of the first steps in this transformation is the decriminalization of low-level, nonviolent offenses, particularly those related to drug possession, technical parole violations, and minor property crimes. Instead of incarcerating individuals for these offenses, society should focus on alternative solutions such as community service, restorative justice programs, and access to education and treatment services. These alternatives not only address the underlying causes of criminal behavior but also reduce the burden on the prison system and help individuals avoid the traumatic and often dangerous experience of incarceration.
Rehabilitation-Focused Prison Environments: For those who do enter the prison system, the environment must be transformed from one of punishment and violence to one of rehabilitation and support. This requires significant investment in education, vocational training, mental health services, and substance abuse treatment within prisons. By providing inmates with the tools they need to succeed outside of prison, the system can reduce recidivism rates and help individuals reintegrate into society as productive, law-abiding citizens.
In addition, prison staff must be trained in conflict resolution, trauma-informed care, and rehabilitation practices, rather than relying on punitive measures and the use of force. This shift would create a prison environment that prioritizes the well-being of inmates and staff alike, reducing violence and promoting positive outcomes.
Eliminating the Profit Motive: Perhaps most importantly, the profit motive must be removed from the prison system. This can be achieved by eliminating private prisons and restructuring state and federal facilities to prioritize rehabilitation over incarceration. Funding should be redirected towards programs that help inmates successfully reintegrate into society, rather than towards maintaining high incarceration rates.
Moreover, policymakers must ensure that the prison system is transparent and accountable to the public. This includes implementing oversight mechanisms to prevent the abuse of inmates, ensuring that sentencing policies are fair and just, and creating opportunities for inmates to have their sentences reviewed and potentially reduced if they demonstrate rehabilitation.
Conclusion: Reclaiming Justice and Human Dignity
The current prison system in the United States is a deeply flawed institution that perpetuates violence, extends incarceration, and profits from human suffering. It is a system that fails to uphold the principles of justice and rehabilitation, instead creating a cycle of criminalization and incarceration that traps individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities, in a life of hardship and despair.
Reforming this system is not just a matter of policy but of morality. The United States must shift its focus from punishment to rehabilitation, from profit to people. This transformation will require bold leadership, public awareness, and a commitment to social justice. However, the rewards—a more just and equitable society, safer communities, and the restoration of human dignity—are well worth the effort.
As a society, we must recognize that every individual has the potential for change, and that our justice system should be a vehicle for that transformation, not an obstacle to it. Only by breaking the cycle of violence and profit-driven incarceration can we begin to build a criminal justice system that truly serves the needs of all people.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Zittlow