Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only
There is a branch of Law, defined as EQUITY. It represents the, after all the shenanigans of the other branches of law have failed for whatever reason, let's acknowledge that we are Humans and deal with each other fairly, on the what's right terms. This recognition of "the what's right terms", is the glue of humanness, which is what remains, even during the most dehumanizing and barbaric mete. Then the nemesis of that glue is its fear. Which we experience in all sorts of forms, that can be summarized, simply as, ignorance. I have started like this, to establish the simple proposition that, no matter what, we are and remain human. Even in the honesty of War, combatants respect and recognize their humanness, because the failure to do such is the folly of underestimation. The existence and acceptance of the legal principle or Law of Equity, isn't a formulation of some sort of higher aspiration besides the simple visceral recognition that, even in the process of braining each other we have to catch our breath, which then allows that, why are we even doing this, which is when we then start to respect, the condition and circumstance of, Peace. Now with all due respect to Clausewitz and his insight that "war is politics by other means", not everyone is honest, meaning smart enough to give both euphemisms their due respect. So we have Officers of War who underestimate their opponents, likewise Politicians who underestimate their polity with the virtual and consequential undermining of the Social Contract with the disrespect of exploitive and manipulative calculations of what schemes will ensure the materialization of that other insight, the Machiavellian " ends justifies the means ", of their acquisitioned self-interest and of the Virginia Politicians' many means ,that of exploiting the victim of crime, is pretty much unassailable and irreproachable, due to fear. Because who amongst the People will dare challenge the idea that speaking up for the concerns of the victims of crime isn't equitable and just?. Which brings me to that fly in the ointment of understanding and knowing. If we accept the fact of the Law of Equity, then it also goes to say we accept the preeminence of Natural Law, or that relationship that doesn't require or is at the behest of Social Contract. In other words it is the existence without political-economy, if we accept that political-economy is the economic activity of a multiplicity of relationships, interactions and intersections and we do. So the victim of crime existing in a social contract under terms of its political-economy surrenders their Natural Law claim to that of the other types of Law, which exist as a surrogate Natural Law. What I'm saying is when a person suffers harm, under natural law or in the absence of a social contract, the repair of the harm rest or relies on and upon the victim or family's ability. But as soon as a Social Contract emerges the responsibility and obligation of repairing the harm is then assumed by the collective viz The Commonwealth of Virginia or The People. The process and law is automatically exacted in the interest of the harmed or victim of the deed and the Virginia politician understands this, because this is Social Contract 101.Yet what we see is a type of Virginia politician lying about this and deceiving the harmed
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
No comments :
Post a Comment