There is only one acknowledgement to be realized: Which is the Virginia Prison Official's subordination to the Peoples intention of the Accountability-Function of governance. I BEGIN: I will spare us the enterprise of critiquing the sham Speech, meaning the activity of Virginia's Social Contract prior to the emergence of RUFFIN v. COMMONWEALTH 62 VA.790 and simply stipulate, that the fatuous work of those 1871 Virginia Supreme Court Jurist examination of Virginia's Bill of Rights in RUFFIN clearly orients the corrupt inherency of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, which the Virginia prison official continues its embodiment. Whether or not I'm correct in characterizing the 1871 work of Virginia's Supreme Court in RUFFIN as fatuous isn't up to any honest debate and here is the basic fact, can a human or socio-person step outside of history? Of course not and simply having to state it shows how low it's bar of reason. Well that is exactly what those Virginia Jurist in 1871 ask us to accept, with their Bill of Rights excluding the Virginia prisoner jurisprudence and it's with that work does the inherent corruption of Virginia's imprisonment scheme stand pathetically laid bare and naked. Because you cannot say that human/socio-person's behavior is a construct of "law", then turn right around and "simply" proclaim that that creation of a construct of law, is all of a sudden outside of law and then introduce an arbiter, a summary dispensation of, to quote RUFFIN....."[S]such as the law in its benignity accords to them." This people is sophistry, a revelation of what law meant to and was understood by the Virginia Jurist of 1871, who naturally were either full members of the Commonwealth's elite or its support functionaries. Of course none of this Bi-Polarism of THOUGHT is novel, we encounter it over and over, time and time again. From the Virginia prison official's professional instinct of dehumanizing the Virginia prisoner, meaning seeing the prisoner as less than, while still expecting that the Virginia prisoner exhibit that most quintessential of humanness, which is the ability to comprehend, by exercising ability and capacity to understand, which in the context of the imprisonment scheme is prison rules, procedures, programs e.t.c, meaning the prisoner isn't less than, after all. To that other classic example of theorizing on Man's Liberty even as the practice of subjugation was reaching new dimensions with the creation of HOMO CHATTEL. Our human condition is replete with example after example of that inherent corruption as dialectical nemesis, when we are intent on holding it accountable. But when we are not we experience it as Southern enslavers accusing and "blaming" Northern Abolitionists for "instigating" ideas of freedom in the heads of the enslaved or the Virginia prison official having no refuge for the corrupt professional behavior of above-the-lawism, grasping the strawman logic that the People's intention and will of subordination to the accountability-function of governance is delegitimizing's delegitmization of the Virginia prison official is a fait accompli, revealed to the Virginia prisoner with every interaction with the Virginia prison official. All one has to do is peruse the chronicles upon chronicles of Court claims stating the sort of quite frankly disqualifying Virginia prison official behavior which Virginia law at Virginia code 19.2-83.6 and Virginia code 15.2-1707 are intended to respond to. When the prison official lies, contrives an infraction on a prisoner, denies a duty it's delegitimizing.
By William Thorpe
William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982 .
No comments :
Post a Comment