Virginia Prisons Accountability Committee

Sunday, February 27, 2022

Advocacy Groups Need To Stop Sending Form Letters

Here is an example of a form letter that is a slap in the face and dash of cold water in the face of a prisoner. What we ask advocacy groups do is humanize and personalize the responses. The injustices of the American system is mechanical bureaucracy we don't need advocacy groups mimicking and imitating the bureaucracy.



vapac

Tuesday, February 8, 2022

The American Prisoner Is A Slave By William Thorpe

 

United States Constitution Amendment 13

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

The  American Prisoner Is A Slave

The 13th Amendment of The United States Constitution is a wink and nod to the continuation of that most evil of human relations, slavery. The American prisoner is a slave and this backdrop of slavery presents us with a paradox. Books and purported services intended to assist the American prisoner priced beyond the means of the enslaved prisoner.

No one begrudges compensation for authors and writers of books intended to assist prisoners. But we have to point out that the American prisoner as slave cannot be, nor expected to pay prices and cost for services, supposedly by allies in the fight against the injustices of the American justice system and the reform of it's prison experiment, as if the enslaved American prisoner is a normal wage earner.

Priced Beyond Reach Of The Enslaved American Prisoner

  1. Prison Education Guide by C. Zoukis @ $49.95
  2. The Habeas Cite Book: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel by B. Sample @ $49.95
  3. The Criminal Law Handbook: Know Your Rights, Survive the System By Bergman and S.J. Berman-Barrett @$39.99
  4. Represent Yourself In Court: How To Prepare and Try A Winning Case by P. Bergman and S.J. Berman-Barrett @ $39.99
  5. Legal Research: How To Find Understand The Law by S. Elias and S. Levinkind @ $49.99
  6. Deposition Handbook by P. Bergman and A. Moore @ $34.99
  7. Criminal Law: A Desk Reference by P. Bergman @ $44.99
  8. Prisoners Self Help Litigation Manual by J. Boston and D. Manville @ $59.99
  9. How To Win Your Personal Injury Claim by J. Matthew @ $34.99
  10. Sue The Doctor and Win! Victims Guide To Secrets of Malpractice Lawsuits by L.Laska @ $34.95
  11. Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual by D. Manville @ $49.95
  12. The PLRA Handbook: Law and Practice Under The Prison Litigation Reform Act by J. Boston @ $84.95 and $224.95 [non-prisoner]
  13. Federal Prison Handbook by C. Zoukis @ $74.95
  14. The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct by A. Hull @ $59.95
  15. Encyclopedia of Everday Law by S. Irving @ $34.99
Is Also An Injustice

The above-listed 15 books are not the sum of the cottage industry work of profiting off the enslaved American prisoner but is an example of its tone-deafness. The outcome that I expect and anticipate as a result of this work is the realization and its subsequent reflection that pricing a book out of the means of its beneficiary is also an injustice.

I'm William Thorpe and I'm Detained in Solitary Confinement at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice



Monday, January 31, 2022

Docket William Thorpe v. Harold Clarke Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


Docket William Thorpe v. Harold Clarke
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Argued: January 25th, 2022
Duration: 48:49
Docket Number: 21-1714
Judges: Henry Franklin Floyd, Roger L. Gregory, Stephanie Dawn
Thacker
This item represents an oral argument audio file as scraped from a U.S. Government website by Free Law Project.

Friday, January 7, 2022

THORPE, ET AL. V. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

 Original Content created by ACLU of Virginia 

The ACLU of Virginia, [Follow link for complete up to date PDF files to follow this case] in collaboration with the law firm of White & Case LLP, filed a federal class-action lawsuit against the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) seeking to end the practice of solitary confinement in two of its most notorious prisons.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of people who have suffered in torturous conditions, some for decades, at Red Onion and Wallen's Ridge state prisons. It was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia in April of 2020. Both facilities are super maximum-security prisons located in the far southwest corner of the state that were designed to hold people in near-constant isolation and deprivation.

Solitary confinement, the practice of keeping someone alone in a small space for 22 hours or more per day with little to no stimulation or human contact, is known to cause mental and physical deterioration in as little as 10 days. The lengths of stay in solitary confinement of the 12 named plaintiffs in the case range from two to 24 years.

The lawsuit describes VDOC’s use of a complex, arbitrary system – known as the Step-Down Program – purportedly intended to help people work their way out of solitary. The lawsuit alleges that in practice, the Step-Down Program has kept hundreds of people in solitary confinement at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge. The lawsuit further alleges that officials administer the program in violation of the constitutional rights of those being held and with indifference to the suffering and harm being inflicted.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that VDOC built Red Onion and Wallens Ridge – and instituted the Step-Down Program – after settling a previous class-action lawsuit about solitary confinement at Mecklenburg Correctional Center, which closed in 2012. In the 1984 settlement agreement, VDOC promised never again to reinstate the type of program or conditions at Mecklenburg; yet it did so and continues to do so at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge without notifying the court or the plaintiffs in the previous case as was required.

The lawsuit alleges the current Step-Down Program is nearly identical to a “Phase Program” used at Mecklenburg, which an independent study commission formed by the state government determined VDOC was using to divert people from other state facilities and inappropriately keep them in solitary at Mecklenburg.

The lawsuit alleges under VDOC’s current Step-Down Program, people who are subjectively classified by correctional officers as being a security risk based on vague criteria and without due process may be placed in solitary confinement. Once there, it is nearly impossible for many to navigate the labyrinth of requirements to be released into general population.

Some are kept in solitary for infractions as minimal as not shaving their beard, using disrespectful language, or refusing to stand for count, while others are placed and kept in solitary because they cannot meet the program’s journaling requirements, according to the lawsuit. Still others are in solitary because of behaviors related to mental illness even though solitary confinement itself exacerbates and even causes mental illness.

The lawsuit seeks to end the Step-Down Program, close the solitary confinement units at Red Onion and Wallens Ridge, and appoint a special master to bring VDOC’s prisons into compliance. It also seeks to award the plaintiffs compensatory damages for these violations.

 ATTORNEY(S)

Vishal Agraharkar and Eden Heilman, ACLU of Virginia

PRO BONO LAW FIRM(S)

White and Case

 

DATE FILED

MAY 6, 2019

COURT

Western District of Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division

JUDGE

James P. Jones

STATUS

Filed

CASE NUMBER


We at vapac thank ACLU  & White and Case for all they do. gratitude.....