YOU DON'T HAVE TO CARE ABOUT PRISONERS AND VIRGINIA'S IMPRISONMENT SCHEME. BUT IF YOU HAVE EXPECTATIONS OF A "PROCESS", WHICH IS, RULE OF LAW, THEN YOU SHOULD CARE THAT THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL VIOLATES IT MATTER OF FACTLY, SHAMELESSLY By William Thorpe

Pictures are taken from the internet and are used for illustrative purposes only

In April 2025 I shed light on an incident, which a part of the title was, THE EGREGIOUS CASE OF BURKE v. STANLEY YOUNG 2024 VA. App. LEXIS 550. A Virginia State case, presented by Mr. Conrad Burke, then a Prisoner held at Virginia's Pocahontas State Correctional Center. Look People these examples of incidents would be meaningless, if the State of Virginia wasn't accusing, charging, convicting and imprisoning People for violating Laws, which the State then turns right around and violates those same Laws, in worst ways during its scheme of the imprisonment and imprisoning People. Then to compound it or clothe it in aggravating circumstances. We The People, (including Prisoners, especially Prisoners) in whose name every single construct and term of Virginia's Social Contract, is contextually formulated on are hectored at and lectured to, explicitly and implicitly by every last one of Virginia's Social Contractual Institutions, who exist in abject betrayal of advancing that one and only function, that of developing the business of human existence, by compromising it on a smorgasbord of cravenness. From elected Politicians as Legislators, to embody Virginia governance, to its Religious, Academia, Labor-Business antagonism, through its Media, Arts and Entertainment Speech, with the inanity of "don't do the crime, if you can't do the time" as response to the basic and fundamental ask of holding the Virginia Prison Official Accountable for crimes done as "professional" behavior. Before I continue, I have to point this out, the Commonwealth of Virginia for better or worse, lays claim, to a specific political speech, which is constituted as a Commonwealth or Popular Sovereignty, meaning the People are the Supreme Power. When we say "the People", this isn't the sort of politics where the very next question is who and what are the People as in the subset this or subset that sophistry, of the reactionary Antonin Scalia, presenting itself as materialist jurisprudence, when we clearly see it's Crow feet of supremacist presumptions with its decaying hang nails and bunions. The People, despite and besides, that due to systemic ignorance's isn't grasped as such, is there full of the energy of limitless potential, which we perceive not in its legatee affirmative but in every single last gimmick and gambit unleashed by the Organized-Violence of reaction towards its subjugation and suppression. So we encounter it as the above-the-lawism of the Virginia prison official, when under law is what permits and allows the prison official's presumptions, that professional existence is carte blanche to violate. Its under the declared Constituted aspirations of the Commonwealth and its process that we experience the depths of its violation in its scapegoating of the Virginia Prisoner, where we see it again as antagonism of, if soil or the Earth was "blessed" to have been shaped, formed, manipulated and breathed into to "be" Man, yet it is subsequently cursed and without cause, because of a series of events, which if we are to accept the narrative, absolutely and unconditionally was preordained and foreseen. As in the Virginia Prisoner is defacto a creation of Virginia law, as such the most lawful of Virginia's Speech, yet it's also with the Prisoner we experience Virginia's Speech violative of its own law at its comprehensive worst. Which this example, clearly shows, HOLLEY v. COMBS 134 F 4th 142.

Holley v. Combs, isn't an outlier. As a matter of fact we won't even have a Holley v. Combs at 134 F4th 142, if three Judges of the Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, specifically, Judges GREGORY, WYNN and HEYTENS, hadn't applied the correct and appropriate jurisprudence, which Judge WYNN wrote the Opinion and stated, "These allegations [by Holley] paint a picture of deliberate retaliation against Holley for complaining about his conditions of confinement. Further, according to Holley, these punishments were not isolated occurrences. He alleges a pattern of retaliatory treatment against Prisoners deemed to be disruptive. Holley cites news reports that include claims that officers assaulted Prisoners...". Judge Wynn also cites, [Kevin Rashid] JOHNSON v. WARNER 200 F. App'x 270, 271 (4th Cir 2006) (Per curiam) (vacating denial of in Forma pauperis status where a prisoner alleged " a number of assaults by prison guards". I BEGIN: What Mr. Garfield William Holley, exposes and unequivocally challenges with his Holley v. Combs case against the depravity of Koncentration Kamp Wallens Ridge State Prison Officials, is, for example: this continuum of window dressing performative prison reform Speech, again presented in the notion by Governor Abigail Spanberger, that a simple advisory and suggestive entity as her recently created GOVERNOR'S COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL ON CORRECTIONS, can even dare speak to on its face, without any comprehensive scrutiny and interrogation of the Virginia prison official's mindset, the very operational philosophy of Virginia's Department of Corrections that can only come from the bully pulpit of a Virginia Governor, as actual Accountability-Function of governance. Mr. Holley's case not only indicts the petty-tyranny of the savagery and barbarism of the Virginia prison official, in his case at Koncentration Kamp Wallens Ridges. But it ensuingly exposes, the entire incident as a cultural habit, which I have been consistently and laboriously critiquing its systemic existence. Because, in order for Mr. Holley to proceed in any Court, whether Federal or State, he had to have went through the administrative process of satisfying the Federal and State of Virginia Grievance procedure, which is no small feat. After surmounting that hurdle and let's not lose sight of the horrendous acts he said that Wallens Ridge prison official subjected him to, which no one in the entire Virginia Department of Corrections saw fit according to their sworn oath to uphold Law, that these claims by a Prisoner must be investigated. Then, when Mr. Holley made it to U.S. Federal Courts, those initial Judges, again dismissed his claims on the typical moves by the Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, who defends Virginia prison officials accused of crimes, malfeasances and wrong doing, in the name of the People of Virginia who rarely are told by Virginia corporate media that their tax money is being spent defending Virginia prison officials who are accused of behaving as Mr. Holley claimed. Let's focus a bit on Virginia's corporate or mainstream media and the way it handles what it means to inform, educate and give insight to the Virginia socio-person for the purpose of determining whether its elected leaders are behaving appropriately according to the privilege, responsibility and obligation the electoral activity has accorded them. In one word Virginia mainstream media editorializes its function, when the issues receiving the coverage are of a specific formulation typifying a demographic existing under a particular sort of dynamic within Virginia's Social Contract. Issues of Virginia's Imprisonment scheme are the low hanging fruit of coverage. Which case as Mr. Holley's, attest to.

By William Thorpe 

 I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982