YES, Sec.1985 (3) OF 42 USC OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871, AKA THE KU KLUX KLAN ACT SHOULD BE USED TO HOLD THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL ACCOUNTABLE..... by William Thorpe

The majority of imprisoned Virginians will return to society and the treatment experienced under the imprisonment conditions created by the Virginia prison official will henceforth determine and dictate the subsequent realized all around development of their humanness. I'm not speaking of the typical gibberish pablum super long handled ladle fed us by the idealistically delusional and insidiously inclined, support functionary of the status quo narrative laboring to assembly line like provide occupants for Virginia's prison cages. But what I want to focus on is the contradiction of Virginia's imprisonment premise. What I'll use to get the point across are the pillars of the Nations' and The Commonwealth of Virginias' Social Contract. Because the manner in which the prison official violates every aspect of it's very basis that even allows proximity with the prisoner is the fundamental problem or antagonism. In other words the people of and the Virginia tax payer cannot surrogately, through the prison official behave just as deviantly as the "convicted" and imprisoned while expecting "what"? Of the imprisoned, because as I will show with a listing of law suits by Virginia prisoners. The Virginia prison officials 'behavior during the performance of their duties is vilely antebellum old and savage that it is haplessly in violation of laws borne of the Nations most destructive and bloodletting war, The Civil War. Now, section 1985 of UNITED STATES LAW 42 USC is Titled, CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS. Paragraph (3) of section 1985 states, DEPRIVING PERSONS OF RIGHTS OR PRIVILEGES. IF TWO OR MORE PERSONS IN ANY STATE OR TERRITORY CONSPIRE...and what the below listed cases will show is it's gratuitous violation by the Virginia prison official and I ask the reader to study the cases.

Vaughn v. Watts Dist. Lexis 51898. Tokley v.Ratliff 2007 U.S Dist. Lexis 24896. Davis v.Lester 156 F.Supp.2d 588. Barbee v. Anderson 2020 U.S Dist. Lexis 43133 Hessing v. Brunelle 2016 U.S Dist. Lexis 63026 Bennett v. Stirling 842 F.3d 319 Parker v. Proffit 1995 U.S Dist .Lexis 15941 Peyton v. Carico 2011 U.S Dist. Lexis 54243 Talbert v. Smith 2007 U.S Dist. Lexis 17108 Howard v. Stidham 2019 U.S Dist. Lexis 30704 Riddick v. Moore 2023 U.S Dist. Lexis 52822 Riddick v. Moore 2023 US Dist. Lexis 55162 Delk v. Moran 2018 U.S Dist. Lexis 50534 McCurdy v. Va.Dept.of Corr.2017 U.S Dist. Lexis 142788 Smith v. Ely 2015 U.S Dist .Lexis 175360 Farrakhan v. Johnson 2009 U.S Dist. Lexis 40342 Woodhouse v. Duncan 2018 U.S Dist. Lexis 53332 Woodhouse v. 2017U.S Dist. Lexis 211528 McCoy v. Young 2012 U.S Dist. Lexis 71547 The above are examples of the Virginia prison official's racist animus, using "nigger" while assaulting, threatening prisoners, which is element for a violation of 1985 (3) of 42 USC.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit