Look people, I'm a prisoner who has been and is under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Virginia pretty much all of my life, since the age of 20 and I'm now 65, my nickname is SPORTY BLACK.I have experienced and been subjected to Virginia's idea of imprisonment in all its forms, from what is termed General Population to Solitary Confinement to my current state of exile to the Texas prison system, where I'm still held in solitary confinement. As such all that I say about Virginia is based on the intimacy of my knowledge and in extension grasp of our human condition. So with this stated, let me get into it with this unequivocal declaration, which I've stated in previous works: The Virginia Department of Corrections is inherently corrupt and this doesn't necessarily mean that its human elements administering its existence are intrinsically corrupt but what I'm saying and by the way, (this isn't unique to The Department), is the existing and current terms of The Department's formulations or its idea and understanding of itself as "agency" is corrupt, because of the idealistic nature of its "accountability". I started with explaining, what is Chadwick Dotson in the role of Director of The Department and how Virginia legislators made legal that historically well understood corruption of absolute power corrupts by codifying the de jure Dictatorship of the Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections at Virginia Code Title 53.1 at 53.1-10 and regardless of reason have enabled in the continuation of the corrupting of The Department. The presumption of authority and power is it will be exercised, applied and utilized necessarily. Consequently the emergence and existence of power anticipates accountability, a process that is equal to its objective. So those Virginia politicians who made the Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections an absolute position should have understood the historical inherency of corruption and in particular the corruption of The Directorate of The Virginia Department of Corrections and what they had done and subsequently established equivalent process of accountability, but they didn't. Now let me say this, notwithstanding the responsibility of those Virginia politicians, primacy is with The People of Virginia to understand that whatever good intentions their politicians and legislators had, without equal measure of accountability, it was practically a transit to hell and perdition and here is also proof of point of the inherency of corruption. The exercise of the required process of accountability is also dependent on acceptance of its duty, which would then imply duty of citizenship or that colloquial and provincial, civic duty, which by the way is understood amorphously as such corruptly. So in the face of all of this confusion what The Social Contract is left with is a Chadwick Dotson to his own suppositions, biases and prejudices, to do as he considers fit and we see its expressions with, Chadwick Dotson telling us that, Virginia prisoners who are self-immolating, setting themselves on fire, isn't nothing because they weren't consumed in the flames, which is his response to the timid and feeble process of accountability that came his way. So we again see this idealistic exercise of judgement by the Directorate of The Virginia Department of Corrections over the practicality of allowing the Virginia prisoner access to phones on electronic Tablets which prison systems four fold, even five fold the size of Virginia's system, dealing with the same issues and concerns have seen fit to make accessible to their prisoner population, yet Chadwick Dotson hems and haws which leaves us with one conclusion, he values the mayhem.
By William Thorpe
I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982
No comments :
Post a Comment