THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS INFERIOR COURTS AND STATE COURTS MADE PRISON OFFICIALS, ABOVE THE LAW WITH ITS "QUALIFIED IMMUNITY" SUBORNATION, HERE IS AN IDEA TO RETURN THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL TO THE RIGHTFUL WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF VIRGINIA UNDER LAW By William Thorpe

Aubrey McKay, an imprisoned Virginian, wasn't sent to prison to die but died in the custody of Virginia Prison Officials at Koncentration Kamp Wallens Ridge State Prison, this past June 4th, 2025.His release was imminent in July 2025, his birth month. Instead, his Mother got his body. Under the governance of Governor Glenn Youngkin, his Republican cabal and allies, The Virginia Department of Corrections and its Prisons under the Administration of Director Chadwick Dotson has been one catastrophe after the other, of unimaginable horrors as prisoners protesting their deplorable conditions and circumstances set themselves on fire in a desperate speech of self-immolation, requiring the responsiveness of the Virginia Prison Official, were they responsible and accountable to their legal obligations, under law, to the will of the People of Virginia, but due to the malfeasant permissiveness and extremism of Governor Glenn Youngkin and Republicans and the monstrosity of the "Qualified Immunity" subornation, allowing the Virginia Prison official to thumb their nose at the People of Virginia and the Social Contract's "faith and trust" that no one is above the law, especially the Prison Official who has sworn and is Oath Bound to be under Law, shirked it. I BEGIN: Our Politicians, who are also our legislators, have shown themselves regardless of reason incapable, unwilling or both of holding accountable the Virginia Prison official to the will of the People, under Law. However, there are limitless reasoning premises of Virginia law, dealing with Virginia's imprisonment scheme, that not only indicates but supports and defends what I'm about to outline as a step towards holding the Virginia Prison official accountable. VIRGINIA CODE TITLE 53.1-25 DIRECTOR TO PRESCRIBE RULES RULES TO BE AVAILABLE TO PRISONERS. This law allows the Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections to make and make accessible such rules to those held imprisoned in his/her custody and care. The premise of this law is the simple common sense of everything human society (which prison is also) that any type of interaction or relationship regardless of terms, whether its enslaved and enslaver, prison official and prisoner, Government and the People, requires and is based on understanding and cooperation whether its coerced or voluntary. So Virginia law 53.1-25, requiring The head overseer of the Prison System to promulgate rules, policies or that basic understanding of terms of relationship between the imprisoned Virginian and the Prison official is premised on the agency of the prisoner to understand and cooperate and this has another name and classification, which is, a CONTRACT.BLACK'S LAW defines CONTRACT thus: "An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law". This definition fits the Operating Procedures, Policies and Rules of Virginia Prisons as such if Virginia's imprisonment scheme demands and requires the cognitive agency of the imprisoned then it follows that, the Virginia Prisoner must also have a claim on the performance of the Virginia Prison official functioning and operating within the Prison 

If there is any debate to be had on whether the Virginia Prisoner, for purposes of holding the Virginia Prison Official Accountable, has a claim, or to properly present the question, "has standing" to assert claim on the performance of the Virginia Prison Official's professional behavior, we leave its distinction and formulations of distinguishing it to the assumptions of it's Contra, while as we understand our relationship with The Commonwealth of Virginia as Virginia Prisoners, that yes we have and possess all that is required, which is no more no less than the fact that we are subject and the objective of why the People of Virginia are redistributing and transferring wealth as wages to the Virginia Prison official in exchange for the professional behavior and service of administering Virginia's scheme of imprisonment. Aubrey McKay didn't die in the custody of Virginia Prison officials, after its all said and done, for no other reason than non-responsiveness, unresponsiveness and a fundamental presumption that they, the Virginia Prison official, are above the law, the same law that created them and allows them to exist as prison officials in the first place. What I propose isn't novel within the prison context, even in the Virginia Prison and imprisonment terms, because during various tableau's of Virginia's imprisonment scheme, various Virginia Prison officials have exploited the basic idea, when it suited their fancy, especially when criticism and popular outrage of their savagery and barbarism were reaching an untenable critical mass, as a pacifying mode of communication, of what I see as a comprehensive mechanism of returning the Virginia Prison official back to being accountable to the People of Virginia. The idea is simple, Virginia Prisoners grade Wardens/Superintendents, not as some ad hoc public relations stunt to assuage and pacify popular outrage, but a grading scheme with real teeth, under the commission of Virginia law as an accountability mechanism that actually impacts the professional existence of Wardens, Superintendents. The grading MUST INCLUDE AND CONSIST OF ,Responsiveness of the specific prison administration under the Warden/Superintendent, extent to which the specific administration complies with Virginia Department of Corrections Food Service Mandates, the prison administration's willingness to discipline racist prison officials. The above are just a drop in the bucket of the requisite grading data points. But the general idea is Virginia prisoners grade the various Wardens/Superintendents biannually and the results of the grading are actual accountability measures that will result in retention or dismissal from the privilege of doing the Peoples work as a Virginia Prison official. Once again what I'm outlying is a general parameter of a practical manner of oversight that doesn't subject the People of the Commonwealth to the obscenity and insults to their intelligence of spectacles of the Virginia Prison official hectoring during pro forma "oversight hearings" why they can't comply with the law, why they shouldn't and why the Virginia prisoner should be seen as an insurgent and enemy combatant. Let me speak to the "Qualified Immunity" subornation foisted on The People along with an entire deconstructive scheme that, if once upon a time notwithstanding its serious inherent contradictions and antagonisms, The Constitution Of The United States declared aspirations that were institutionally radical, but has now become caked up and pathetically seamy as whatever metaphor you the reader can conjure up. Reform is a natural must as such any construct that purports, to exempt its scrutiny, which "Qualified Immunity" does is Anti.

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982