THE VIRGINIA PRISON OFFICIAL GETS HIS/HER CUE FROM THE PETTY-TYRANNICAL SOPHISTRY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: A CASE STUDY By William Thorpe

 

In a December 4, 2025 decision, the six reactionaries on the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, namely Chief Justice ROBERTS, THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH and BARRETT reminded us in a case ABBOTT v. LULAC 2025 U.S. LEXIS 4484, why "ideology" isn't fit as guide for stability in a Social Contract requiring the socialization and democratization of terms and divisions of labor for existence, along with the fact that the enforcers of such terms and divisions of labor, the organized violence of the state, specifically the Justice Infrastructure and the prison official, which the focus of this work identifies as The Virginia Prison Official, take their cue from the sophistry of reaction and its intellectual-liberalism, actualized and realized as petty-tyranny. I BEGIN: George Floyd a black Man was murdered on March 25, 2020 by a Minneapolis cop, Derek Chauvin. The killing and murder of George Floyd exposed and revealed why, as I initially posited that "ideology" isn't fit as guide for stability in a Social Contract requiring the socialization and democratization of terms and divisions of labor for existence, because in George Floyd we find and encounter the embodiment and entire universe of all that is ideologically contradictory and the inherent existence of antagonisms of the socialization and democratization of Social Contract terms and Labor divisions. Because the killing and murder of George Floyd wasn't mechanically due to the 9 minutes of dehumanization from the force and pressure of Derek Chauvin's knee on Mr. Floyd's neck, but it was the continuum of machinations of centuries upon centuries of ideological contradictions and the dehumanizing antagonisms of, again centuries upon centuries of the socialization and democratization of Social Contract terms and labor divisions, which ruptured into a National Speech of reckoning, a resolution following Mr. Floyd's death while concurrently also erupting in an International speech that saw Mr. Floyd's murder not as a specificity but a result of ideological contradictions and antagonisms of Social Contract terms and divisions of labor that also anticipated historical reckoning and resolution. The six named reactionaries on the Supreme Court Of The United States whose decision in ABBOTT v. LULAC reminds us of the folly of ideology and its intellectual-liberalism, have presented us with an example that doesn't require much by way of expounding to show the petty-tyranny of its sophistry save to add that it also reveals the wisdom of our ancestral admonishment against the intoxication of ideology and zealotry. ABBOTT v. LULAC is a case that is at odds with the Constitution of The United States, in other words it presents claims of acts violating Law, particularly "racial gerrymandering" by Texas Republicans at the behest of Donald Trump. Ideology emerges as the animating motive of the decision making of the six reactionaries on the Supreme Court, but the reason it presents a cue to for example the Virginia prison official as guide to the mechanics of, impunity is the sophistry employed and deployed by the reactionaries in question, when we are given this as basis of their decision. "TEXAS HAS ALSO MADE A STRONG SHOWING OF IRREPARABLE HARM AND THAT THE EQUITIES AND PUBLIC INTEREST FAVOR IT".Isn't the issue racial gerrymandering and since when is "harm" to a faction in an undemocratic and unlawful quest an "equities and public interest"?

By William Thorpe

I'm William Thorpe Virginia exiled me to the Texas prison system. I'm solitary confined at the Wainwright Unit and if you feel any kinda way about this work contact me by Securus email using the Texas prison number #2261982